| Literature DB >> 31888586 |
Yang Xue1, Zhen Zhang2, Chu-Qiao Sheng2, Yu-Mei Li2, Fei-Yong Jia3.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Multiple studies have shown that diaphragmatic ultrasound can better predict the outcome of weaning in adults. However, there are few studies focusing on children, leading to a lack of sufficient clinical evidence for the application of diaphragmatic ultrasound in children. The purpose of this study was to investigate the predictive value of diaphragm ultrasound for weaning outcomes in critically ill children.Entities:
Keywords: Diaphragm; Mechanical ventilation; Paediatric; Pimax; Ultrasound; Weaning
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31888586 PMCID: PMC6937936 DOI: 10.1186/s12890-019-1034-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Pulm Med ISSN: 1471-2466 Impact factor: 3.317
Fig. 1Ultrasound B-mode using a 10 MHz probe in the zone of apposition
Fig. 2Ultrasound M-mode using a 10 MHz probe in the zone of apposition
Fig. 3Ultrasound assessment of diaphragm diaphragmatic excursion in M-mode
Fig. 4Flow chart of this study
Sample Characteristics
| Characteristics | Weaning success Group( | Weaning failure Group( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, months, median (IQR) | 36.00(15.00–84.00) | 42.00 (10.00–158.00) | 0.55 |
| Male sex (%) | 66.67 (26/39) | 72.73 (8/11) | 0.70 |
| Weight, kg, median (IQR) | 15.00 (10.00–28.00) | 14.00 (8.00–35.00) | 0.94 |
| Height, cm (mean ± SD) | 103.87 ± 32.77 | 107.86 ± 33.99 | 0.73 |
| Cause of respiratory failure, n (%) | |||
| Respiratory dysfunction | 59 (23/39) | 36 (4/11) | |
| Cardiovascular dysfunction | 5 (2/39) | ||
| Other organ dysfunction | 10 (4/39) | 64 (7/11) | |
| Sepsis | 8 (3/39) | ||
| Postoperative | 18 (7/39) | ||
| PCIS (mean ± SD) | 82.18 ± 7.86 | 83.27 ± 5.82 | 0.67 |
| Laboratory findings (mean ± SD) | |||
| pH | 7.46 ± 0.04 | 7.44 ± 0.06 | 0.17 |
| PaO2, mmHg | 99.31 ± 29.81 | 86.78 ± 15.38 | 0.19 |
| PaCO2, mmHg | 36.84 ± 12.10 | 37.45 ± 6.78 | 0.87 |
| P/F | 315.11 ± 102.25 | 301.09 ± 68.93 | 0.61 |
| Ventilatory treatment time, d, median (IQR) | 5.00 (4.00–7.00) | 15.00 (7.00–22.00) | 0.002 |
| Length of PICU stay, d, median (IQR) | 12.00 (10.00–20.00) | 28.00(15.00–30.00) | 0.013 |
| In hospital mortality(%) | 27.27 (3/11) | ||
| Ventilation setting | |||
| Mode | SIMV+PSV | SIMV+PSV | |
| VT, ml/kg of ideal body weight (IQR) | 6.40 (5.76–8.00) | 6.40 (5.00–6.78) | 0.33 |
| PEEP, cmH2O | 5 | 5 | |
PCIS Pediatric Critical Illness Score, IQR Interquartile range; SD Standard Deviation, VT Tidal volume
Weaning indexs of all patients
| Weaning indexs | Weaning success Group(n = 39) | Weaning failure Group(n = 11) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| DTF%(mean ± SD) | 30.93 ± 11.23 | 15.98 ± 6.65 | |
| DE, mm/kg (mean ± SD) | 0.74 ± 0.75 | 0.45 ± 0.32 | 0.23 |
| Tdi at end inspiration, mm/kg (mean ± SD) | 1.07 ± 0.88 | 1.08 ± 0.62 | 0.97 |
| Tdi at end expiration, mm/kg (mean ± SD) | 0.79 ± 0.61 | 0.91 ± 0.49 | 0.59 |
| PImax, cmH2O/kg (mean ± SD) | 0.91 ± 0.56 | 0.56 ± 0.49 | 0.07 |
DTF Diaphragmatic thickening fraction, DE Diaphragmatic excursion, Tdi Diaphragm thickness
PImax Maximum inspiratory pressure
DTF and PImax
| Parameters | Sensitivity(%) | Specificity(%) | PPV(%) | NPV(%) | AUC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DTF ≥ 21% | 82 | 81 | 94 | 56 | 0.89 |
| PImax≥0.86cmH2O/kg | 51 | 82 | 91 | 32 | 0.70 |
PPV Positive predictive value, NPV Negative predictive value, AUC Area under curve