Literature DB >> 31887538

Genetic dissection of rod and cone pathways mediating light responses and receptive fields of ganglion cells in the mouse retina.

R L Seilheimer1, J Sabharwal1, S M Wu2.   

Abstract

Retinal ganglion cells (GCs) are important visual neurons which carry complex spatiotemporal information from the retina to higher visual centers in the brain. By taking advantage of pathway-specific knockout/mutant mice and multi-electrode array (MEA) recording techniques, we analyze contributions of rod and cone pathways to responsiveness, kinetics and receptive field profiles of GCs under scotopic and photopic conditions. Our data suggest: (1) Scotopic responses of some GCs require all three rod pathways, some require only the secondary and tertiary rod pathways, and others require only the tertiary rod pathway. (2) There are more responsive GCs in photopic conditions than responsive GCs in scotopic conditions. (3) Gap junctions slow down GCs' scotopic light responses and increase GCs' ratio of antagonistic to center inputs. (4) Cone pathways do not affect the kinetics but alter the ratio of antagonistic to center inputs of scotopic GC responses, and they speed up GCs photopic responses and alter the ratio of GCs' antagonistic to center synaptic inputs and receptive field profiles. (5) Rod bipolar cells shorten response latency of ON GCs and increase the ratio of GCs' antagonistic to center synaptic inputs. (6) Light adaptation speeds up GCs' temporal processing and tunes GC photopic responses to higher frequencies, and the tertiary rod pathway plays a significant role in adaptation-induced TTP changes in some GCs. (7) GC RF center sizes are partially mediated by AIIACs and GC-GC coupling. (8) Connexin36 gap junctions and cone pathways alter synaptic circuits underlying antagonistic surround inputs to GCs in photopic conditions.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AII amacrine cells; Light-evoked spike responses; Receptive field center; Receptive field surround; Retinal ganglion cells; Spike triggered average (STA)

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31887538      PMCID: PMC7264069          DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2019.12.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  36 in total

1.  Coupling from AII amacrine cells to ON cone bipolar cells is bidirectional.

Authors:  E B Trexler; W Li; S L Mills; S C Massey
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2001-09-03       Impact factor: 3.215

2.  Separate blue and green cone networks in the mammalian retina.

Authors:  Wei Li; Steven H DeVries
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2004-06-20       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Connexin 36 and rod bipolar cell independent rod pathways drive retinal ganglion cells and optokinetic reflexes.

Authors:  Cameron S Cowan; Muhammad Abd-El-Barr; Meike van der Heijden; Eric M Lo; David Paul; Debra E Bramblett; Janis Lem; David L Simons; Samuel M Wu
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Rod, M-cone and M/S-cone inputs to hyperpolarizing bipolar cells in the mouse retina.

Authors:  Ji-Jie Pang; Fan Gao; David L Paul; Samuel M Wu
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Rod and cone pathways in the inner plexiform layer of cat retina.

Authors:  H Kolb; E V Famiglietti
Journal:  Science       Date:  1974-10-04       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 6.  The architecture of functional neural circuits in the vertebrate retina. The Proctor Lecture.

Authors:  H Kolb
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Connexin36 is essential for transmission of rod-mediated visual signals in the mammalian retina.

Authors:  Michael R Deans; Bela Volgyi; Daniel A Goodenough; Stewart A Bloomfield; David L Paul
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2002-11-14       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  Dark-adapted response threshold of OFF ganglion cells is not set by OFF bipolar cells in the mouse retina.

Authors:  A Cyrus Arman; Alapakkam P Sampath
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Genetic dissection of rod and cone pathways in the dark-adapted mouse retina.

Authors:  Muhammad M Abd-El-Barr; Mark E Pennesi; Shannon M Saszik; Andrew J Barrow; Janis Lem; Debra E Bramblett; David L Paul; Laura J Frishman; Samuel M Wu
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-07-08       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  The ON Crossover Circuitry Shapes Spatiotemporal Profile in the Center and Surround of Mouse OFF Retinal Ganglion Cells.

Authors:  Jasdeep Sabharwal; Robert L Seilheimer; Cameron S Cowan; Samuel M Wu
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 3.492

View more
  5 in total

1.  Increased Reliability of Visually-Evoked Activity in Area V1 of the MECP2-Duplication Mouse Model of Autism.

Authors:  Ryan T Ash; Ganna Palagina; Jose A Fernandez-Leon; Jiyoung Park; Rob Seilheimer; Sangkyun Lee; Jasdeep Sabharwal; Fredy Reyes; Jing Wang; Dylan Lu; Muhammad Sarfraz; Emmanouil Froudarakis; Andreas S Tolias; Samuel M Wu; Stelios M Smirnakis
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 6.709

2.  Network Architecture of Gap Junctional Coupling among Parallel Processing Channels in the Mammalian Retina.

Authors:  Crystal L Sigulinsky; James R Anderson; Ethan Kerzner; Christopher N Rapp; Rebecca L Pfeiffer; Taryn M Rodman; Daniel P Emrich; Kevin D Rapp; Noah T Nelson; J Scott Lauritzen; Miriah Meyer; Robert E Marc; Bryan W Jones
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Intraocular Pressure Elevation Compromises Retinal Ganglion Cell Light Adaptation.

Authors:  Xiaofeng Tao; Jasdeep Sabharwal; Samuel M Wu; Benjamin J Frankfort
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  The mammalian rod synaptic ribbon is essential for Cav channel facilitation and ultrafast synaptic vesicle fusion.

Authors:  Chad Paul Grabner; Tobias Moser
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-10-07       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 5.  Interphotoreceptor coupling: an evolutionary perspective.

Authors:  Lorenzo Cangiano; Sabrina Asteriti
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 3.657

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.