Literature DB >> 31887361

Noise-induced Cochlear Synaptopathy with and Without Sensory Cell Loss.

Katharine A Fernandez1, Dan Guo1, Steven Micucci2, Victor De Gruttola3, M Charles Liberman1, Sharon G Kujawa4.   

Abstract

Prior work has provided extensive documentation of threshold sensitivity and sensory hair cell losses after noise exposure. It is now clear, however, that cochlear synaptic loss precedes such losses, at least at low-moderate noise doses, silencing affected neurons. To address questions of whether, and how, cochlear synaptopathy and underlying mechanisms change as noise dose is varied, we assessed cochlear physiologic and histologic consequences of a range of exposures varied in duration from 15 min to 8 h and in level from 85 to 112 dB SPL. Exposures delivered to adult CBA/CaJ mice produced acute elevations in hair cell- and neural-based response thresholds ranging from trivial (∼5 dB) to large (∼50 dB), followed by varying degrees of recovery. Males appeared more noise vulnerable for some conditions of exposure. There was little to no inner hair cell (IHC) loss, but outer hair cell (OHC) loss could be substantial at highest frequencies for highest noise doses. Synapse loss was an early manifestation of noise injury and did not scale directly with either temporary or permanent threshold shift. With increasing noise dose, synapse loss grew to ∼50%, then declined for exposures yielding permanent hair cell injury/loss. All synaptopathic, but no non-synaptopathic exposures produced persistent neural response amplitude declines; those additionally yielding permanent OHC injury/loss also produced persistent reductions in OHC-based responses and exaggerated neural amplitude declines. Findings show that widespread cochlear synaptopathy can be present with and without noise-induced sensory cell loss and that differing patterns of cellular injury influence synaptopathic outcomes.
Copyright © 2019 IBRO. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cochlear deafferentation; cochlear synaptopathy; hair cell; noise-induced hearing loss; sensorineural hearing loss

Year:  2019        PMID: 31887361      PMCID: PMC7450393          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2019.11.051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroscience        ISSN: 0306-4522            Impact factor:   3.590


  49 in total

1.  Differential vulnerability of basal and apical hair cells is based on intrinsic susceptibility to free radicals.

Authors:  S H Sha; R Taylor; A Forge; J Schacht
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 2.  Responses to sound of the basilar membrane of the mammalian cochlea.

Authors:  M A Ruggero
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 6.627

3.  Estradiol treatment and hormonal fluctuations during the estrous cycle modulate the expression of estrogen receptors in the auditory system and the prepulse inhibition of acoustic startle response.

Authors:  Konstantina Charitidi; Inna Meltser; Barbara Canlon
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 4.736

4.  Cochlear neuropathy in human presbycusis: Confocal analysis of hidden hearing loss in post-mortem tissue.

Authors:  Lucas M Viana; Jennifer T O'Malley; Barbara J Burgess; Dianne D Jones; Carlos A C P Oliveira; Felipe Santos; Saumil N Merchant; Leslie D Liberman; M Charles Liberman
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Aging after noise exposure: acceleration of cochlear synaptopathy in "recovered" ears.

Authors:  Katharine A Fernandez; Penelope W C Jeffers; Kumud Lall; M Charles Liberman; Sharon G Kujawa
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Functional significance of dendritic swelling after loud sounds in the guinea pig cochlea.

Authors:  D Robertson
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Threshold shifts in chinchillas exposed to octave bands of noise centered at 63 and 1000 Hz for three days(a).

Authors:  C K Burdick; J H Patterson; B T Mozo; R T Camp
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1978-08       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Acoustic injury in mice: 129/SvEv is exceptionally resistant to noise-induced hearing loss.

Authors:  N Yoshida; S J Hequembourg; C A Atencio; J J Rosowski; M C Liberman
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  TrkB-mediated protection against circadian sensitivity to noise trauma in the murine cochlea.

Authors:  Inna Meltser; Christopher R Cederroth; Vasiliki Basinou; Sergey Savelyev; Gabriella S Lundkvist; Barbara Canlon
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  Adding insult to injury: cochlear nerve degeneration after "temporary" noise-induced hearing loss.

Authors:  Sharon G Kujawa; M Charles Liberman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  29 in total

1.  Optimizing non-invasive functional markers for cochlear deafferentation based on electrocochleography and auditory brainstem responses.

Authors:  Kelly C Harris; Jianxin Bao
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-04       Impact factor: 2.482

2.  Effects of Combined Gentamicin and Furosemide Treatment on Cochlear Macrophages.

Authors:  Liana Sargsyan; Austin R Swisher; Alisa P Hetrick; Hongzhe Li
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 6.208

3.  Evidence for Loss of Activity in Low-Spontaneous-Rate Auditory Nerve Fibers of Older Adults.

Authors:  Carolyn M McClaskey; James W Dias; Richard A Schmiedt; Judy R Dubno; Kelly C Harris
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-01-12

4.  Distorted Tonotopy Severely Degrades Neural Representations of Connected Speech in Noise following Acoustic Trauma.

Authors:  Satyabrata Parida; Michael G Heinz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 6.709

5.  Noise-Induced Hearing Loss and its Prevention: Current Issues in Mammalian Hearing.

Authors:  Colleen G Le Prell; Troy A Hackett; Ramnarayan Ramachandran
Journal:  Curr Opin Physiol       Date:  2020-07-12

6.  Circadian vulnerability of cisplatin-induced ototoxicity in the cochlea.

Authors:  Evangelia Tserga; Rocio Moreno-Paublete; Heela Sarlus; Erik Björn; Eduardo Guimaraes; Christian Göritz; Christopher R Cederroth; Barbara Canlon
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Predicting synapse counts in living humans by combining computational models with auditory physiology.

Authors:  Brad N Buran; Garnett P McMillan; Sarineh Keshishzadeh; Sarah Verhulst; Naomi F Bramhall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 2.482

8.  Reducing Auditory Nerve Excitability by Acute Antagonism of Ca2+-Permeable AMPA Receptors.

Authors:  Amit Walia; Choongheon Lee; Jared Hartsock; Shawn S Goodman; Roland Dolle; Alec N Salt; Jeffery T Lichtenhan; Mark A Rutherford
Journal:  Front Synaptic Neurosci       Date:  2021-07-05

9.  Dose-Dependent Pattern of Cochlear Synaptic Degeneration in C57BL/6J Mice Induced by Repeated Noise Exposure.

Authors:  Minfei Qian; Qixuan Wang; Zhongying Wang; Qingping Ma; Xueling Wang; Kun Han; Hao Wu; Zhiwu Huang
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 3.599

10.  Y-27632, a ROCK inhibitor, improved laser-induced shock wave (LISW)-induced cochlear synaptopathy in mice.

Authors:  Yutaka Koizumi; Kunio Mizutari; Satoko Kawauchi; Shunichi Sato; Akihiro Shiotani; Seiji Kakehata
Journal:  Mol Brain       Date:  2021-07-03       Impact factor: 4.041

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.