| Literature DB >> 31887118 |
Dan Liu1, Songjing Guo2, Mingjun Zou1, Cong Chen1, Fei Deng3, Zhong Xie2,4, Sheng Hu2, Liang Wu2,4.
Abstract
With the acceleration of global urbanization and climate change, dengue fever is spreading worldwide. Different levels of dengue fever have also occurred in China, especially in southern China, causing enormous economic losses. Unfortunately, there is no effective treatment for dengue, and the most popular dengue vaccine does not exhibit good curative effects. Therefore, we developed a Generalized Additive Mixed Model (GAMM) that gathered climate factors (mean temperature, relative humidity and precipitation) and Baidu search data during 2011-2015 in Guangzhou city to improve the accuracy of dengue fever prediction. Firstly, the time series dengue fever data were decomposed into seasonal, trend and remainder components by the seasonal-trend decomposition procedure based on loess (STL). Secondly, the time lag of variables was determined in cross-correlation analysis and the order of autocorrelation was estimated using autocorrelation (ACF) and partial autocorrelation functions (PACF). Finally, the GAMM was built and evaluated by comparing it with Generalized Additive Mode (GAM). Experimental results indicated that the GAMM (R2: 0.95 and RMSE: 34.1) has a superior prediction capability than GAM (R2: 0.86 and RMSE: 121.9). The study could help the government agencies and hospitals respond early to dengue fever outbreak.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31887118 PMCID: PMC6936853 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226841
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Annual dengue incidence in China, Guangdong, and Guangzhou from 2011 to 2015 respectively.
Fig 2Temporal distribution of dengue fever cases in Guangzhou, 2011–2015.
Fig 3The decomposition plot of local dengue cases in the study areas from January 2011 to December 2015.
Fig 4Auto-correlation and partial auto-correlation plots of dengue cases, 2011–2015.
Cross-correlation analysis between dengue cases and average temperature, relative humidity, precipitation, DBSI.
| Temperature | Humidity | Precipitation | DBSI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| -0.073 | 0.055 | |||
| 0.143 | 0.238 | |||
| 0.270 | ||||
| 0.022 | 0.318 | 0.135 | ||
| -0.361 | 0.225 | -0.022 | 0.024 |
Notes: Each positive answer equals 1 point,
*p<0.05.
Fig 5Monthly observed DF cases and fitted local DF cases using two different models from January 2011 to June 2015.
Fig 6Auto-correlation and partial auto-correlation of residuals.
(a) ACF/PACF plot of the Pearson residual of the GAM. (b) ACF/PACF plot of the Pearson residual of the GAMM.
Fig 7Scatter plot of residuals for predicted values using two different models and dates.
(a) Scatter plot of residual for predicted values and dates in the GAM. (b) Scatter plot of residual for predicted values and dates in the GAMM.
Fig 8Observations and model predictions of DF case using two different models from July 2015 to December 2015.