Literature DB >> 31887115

Plant-mediated community structure of spring-fed, coastal rivers.

Matthew V Lauretta1, William E Pine2, Carl J Walters3, Thomas K Frazer4.   

Abstract

Quantifying ecosystem-level processes that drive community structure and function is key to the development of effective environmental restoration and management programs. To assess the effects of large-scale aquatic vegetation loss on fish and invertebrate communities in Florida estuaries, we quantified and compared the food webs of two adjacent spring-fed rivers that flow into the Gulf of Mexico. We constructed a food web model using field-based estimates of community absolute biomass and trophic interactions of a highly productive vegetated river, and modeled long-term simulations of vascular plant decline coupled with seasonal production of filamentous macroalgae. We then compared ecosystem model predictions to observed community structure of the second river that has undergone extensive vegetative habitat loss, including extirpation of several vascular plant species. Alternative models incorporating bottom-up regulation (decreased primary production resulting from plant loss) versus coupled top-down effects (compensatory predator search efficiency) were ranked by total absolute error of model predictions compared to the empirical community observations. Our best model for predicting community responses to vascular plant loss incorporated coupled effects of decreased primary production (bottom-up), increased prey search efficiency of large-bodied fishes at low vascular plant density (top-down), and decreased prey search efficiency of small-bodied fishes with increased biomass of filamentous macroalgae (bottom-up). The results of this study indicate that the loss of vascular plants from the coastal river ecosystem may alter the food web structure and result in a net decline in the biomass of fishes. These results are highly relevant to ongoing landscape-level restoration programs intended to improve aesthetics and ecosystem function of coastal spring-fed rivers by highlighting how the structure of these communities can be regulated both by resource availability and consumption. Restoration programs will need to acknowledge and incorporate both to be successful.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31887115      PMCID: PMC6936880          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219236

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  6 in total

1.  Habitat loss, trophic collapse, and the decline of ecosystem services.

Authors:  Andrew Dobson; David Lodge; Jackie Alder; Graeme S Cumming; Juan Keymer; Jacquie McGlade; Hal Mooney; James A Rusak; Osvaldo Sala; Volkmar Wolters; Diana Wall; Rachel Winfree; Marguerite A Xenopoulos
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 5.499

2.  The relationship between annual production: Biomass ratios and lifespans for marine macrobenthos.

Authors:  Alistar I Robertson
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Algal blooms and the nitrogen-enrichment hypothesis in Florida springs: evidence, alternatives, and adaptive management.

Authors:  James B Heffernan; Dina M Liebowitz; Thomas K Frazer; Jason M Evans; Matthew J Cohen
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.657

Review 4.  Herbivore regulation of plant abundance in aquatic ecosystems.

Authors:  Kevin A Wood; Matthew T O'Hare; Claire McDonald; Kate R Searle; Francis Daunt; Richard A Stillman
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2016-04-08

5.  Accelerating loss of seagrasses across the globe threatens coastal ecosystems.

Authors:  Michelle Waycott; Carlos M Duarte; Tim J B Carruthers; Robert J Orth; William C Dennison; Suzanne Olyarnik; Ainsley Calladine; James W Fourqurean; Kenneth L Heck; A Randall Hughes; Gary A Kendrick; W Judson Kenworthy; Frederick T Short; Susan L Williams
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-07-08       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Food-web structure of seagrass communities across different spatial scales and human impacts.

Authors:  Marta Coll; Allison Schmidt; Tamara Romanuk; Heike K Lotze
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-07-21       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.