Mike R Wilson1, Jeanne Holladay1, Ronald L Chandler1,2,3. 1. Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, Grand Rapids, MI 49503, USA. 2. Center for Epigenetics, Van Andel Research Institute, Grand Rapids, MI 49503, USA. 3. Department of Women's Health, Spectrum Health System, Grand Rapids, MI 49341, USA.
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION: Is it possible to establish a genetically engineered mouse model (GEMM) of endometriosis that mimics the natural spread of invasive endometrium? SUMMARY ANSWER: Endometriosis occurs in an ARID1A (AT-rich interactive domain-containing protein 1A) and PIK3CA (phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase, catalytic subunit alpha) mutant GEMM of endometrial dysfunction following salpingectomy. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Although mouse models of endometriosis have long been established, most models rely on intraperitoneal injection of uterine fragments, steroid hormone treatments or the use of immune-compromised mice. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Mice harboring the lactotransferrin-Cre (LtfCre0/+), Arid1afl, (Gt)R26Pik3ca*H1047R and (Gt)R26mTmG alleles were subject to unilateral salpingectomies at 6 weeks of age. Control (n = 9), LtfCre0/+; (Gt)R26Pik3ca*H1047R; Arid1afl/+ (n = 8) and LtfCre0/+; (Gt)R26Pik3ca*H1047R; Arid1afl/fl (n = 9) were used for the study. The (Gt)R26mTmG allele was used for the purpose of fluorescent lineage tracing of endometrial epithelium. LtfCre0/+; (Gt)R26mTmG (n = 3) and LtfCre0/+; (Gt)R26Pik3ca*H1047R/mTmG; Arid1afl/fl (n = 4) were used for this purpose. Mice were followed until the endpoint of vaginal bleeding at an average time of 17 weeks of age. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: At 6 weeks of age, mice were subjected to salpingectomy surgery. Mice were followed until the time point of vaginal bleeding (average 17 weeks), or aged for 1 year in the case of control mice. At time of sacrifice, endometriotic lesions, ovaries and uterus were collected for the purpose of histochemical and immunohistochemical analyses. Samples were analyzed for markers of the endometriotic tissue and other relevant biomarkers. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Following salpingectomy, LtfCre0/+; (Gt)R26Pik3ca*H1047R/mTmG; Arid1afl/fl mice developed endometriotic lesions, including lesions on the ovary, omentum and abdominal wall. Epithelial glands within lesions were negative for ARID1A and positive for phospho-S6 staining, indicating ARID1A-PIK3CA co-mutation status, and expressed EGFP (enhanced green fluorescent protein), indicating endometrial origins. LARGE-SCALE DATA: N/A. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: LtfCre0/+; (Gt)R26Pik3ca*H1047R; Arid1afl/fl mice develop vaginal bleeding as a result of endometrial dysfunction at an average age of 17 weeks and must be sacrificed. Furthermore, while this model mimics the natural spread of endometriotic tissue directly from the uterus to the peritoneum, the data presented do not reject current hypotheses on endometriosis pathogenesis. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: The idea that endometriosis is the result of abnormal endometrial tissue colonizing the peritoneum via retrograde menstruation has gained widespread support over the past century. However, most models of endometriosis take for granted this possibility, relying on the surgical removal of bulk uterine tissue and subsequent transplantation into the peritoneum. Growing evidence suggests that somatic mutations in ARID1A and PIK3CA are present in the endometrial epithelium. The establishment of a GEMM which mimics the natural spread of endometrium and subsequent lesion formation supports the hypothesis that endometriosis is derived from mutant endometrial epithelium with invasive properties. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This research was supported by the American Cancer Society PF-17-163-02-DDC (M.R.W.), the Mary Kay Foundation 026-16 (R.L.C.) and the Ovarian Cancer Research Fund Alliance 457446 (R.L.C.). The authors declare no competing interests.
STUDY QUESTION: Is it possible to establish a genetically engineered mouse model (GEMM) of endometriosis that mimics the natural spread of invasive endometrium? SUMMARY ANSWER: Endometriosis occurs in an ARID1A (AT-rich interactive domain-containing protein 1A) and PIK3CA (phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase, catalytic subunit alpha) mutant GEMM of endometrial dysfunction following salpingectomy. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Although mouse models of endometriosis have long been established, most models rely on intraperitoneal injection of uterine fragments, steroid hormone treatments or the use of immune-compromised mice. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Mice harboring the lactotransferrin-Cre (LtfCre0/+), Arid1afl, (Gt)R26Pik3ca*H1047R and (Gt)R26mTmG alleles were subject to unilateral salpingectomies at 6 weeks of age. Control (n = 9), LtfCre0/+; (Gt)R26Pik3ca*H1047R; Arid1afl/+ (n = 8) and LtfCre0/+; (Gt)R26Pik3ca*H1047R; Arid1afl/fl (n = 9) were used for the study. The (Gt)R26mTmG allele was used for the purpose of fluorescent lineage tracing of endometrial epithelium. LtfCre0/+; (Gt)R26mTmG (n = 3) and LtfCre0/+; (Gt)R26Pik3ca*H1047R/mTmG; Arid1afl/fl (n = 4) were used for this purpose. Mice were followed until the endpoint of vaginal bleeding at an average time of 17 weeks of age. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: At 6 weeks of age, mice were subjected to salpingectomy surgery. Mice were followed until the time point of vaginal bleeding (average 17 weeks), or aged for 1 year in the case of control mice. At time of sacrifice, endometriotic lesions, ovaries and uterus were collected for the purpose of histochemical and immunohistochemical analyses. Samples were analyzed for markers of the endometriotic tissue and other relevant biomarkers. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Following salpingectomy, LtfCre0/+; (Gt)R26Pik3ca*H1047R/mTmG; Arid1afl/fl mice developed endometriotic lesions, including lesions on the ovary, omentum and abdominal wall. Epithelial glands within lesions were negative for ARID1A and positive for phospho-S6 staining, indicating ARID1A-PIK3CA co-mutation status, and expressed EGFP (enhanced green fluorescent protein), indicating endometrial origins. LARGE-SCALE DATA: N/A. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: LtfCre0/+; (Gt)R26Pik3ca*H1047R; Arid1afl/fl mice develop vaginal bleeding as a result of endometrial dysfunction at an average age of 17 weeks and must be sacrificed. Furthermore, while this model mimics the natural spread of endometriotic tissue directly from the uterus to the peritoneum, the data presented do not reject current hypotheses on endometriosis pathogenesis. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: The idea that endometriosis is the result of abnormal endometrial tissue colonizing the peritoneum via retrograde menstruation has gained widespread support over the past century. However, most models of endometriosis take for granted this possibility, relying on the surgical removal of bulk uterine tissue and subsequent transplantation into the peritoneum. Growing evidence suggests that somatic mutations in ARID1A and PIK3CA are present in the endometrial epithelium. The establishment of a GEMM which mimics the natural spread of endometrium and subsequent lesion formation supports the hypothesis that endometriosis is derived from mutant endometrial epithelium with invasive properties. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This research was supported by the American Cancer Society PF-17-163-02-DDC (M.R.W.), the Mary Kay Foundation 026-16 (R.L.C.) and the Ovarian Cancer Research Fund Alliance 457446 (R.L.C.). The authors declare no competing interests.
Authors: Daniela M Dinulescu; Tan A Ince; Bradley J Quade; Sarah A Shafer; Denise Crowley; Tyler Jacks Journal: Nat Med Date: 2004-12-26 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Ching-wen Cheng; Diana Licence; Emma Cook; Feijun Luo; Mark J Arends; Stephen K Smith; Cristin G Print; D Stephen Charnock-Jones Journal: J Pathol Date: 2011-04-11 Impact factor: 7.996
Authors: Elizabeth M Poole; Wayne T Lin; Marina Kvaskoff; Immaculata De Vivo; Kathryn L Terry; Stacey A Missmer Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2017-03-15 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: G Rossi; E Somigliana; M Moschetta; R Santorsola; S Cozzolino; P Filardo; A Salmaso; B Zingrillo Journal: Arch Gynecol Obstet Date: 2000-02 Impact factor: 2.344
Authors: Tae Hoon Kim; Jung-Yoon Yoo; Zhong Wang; John P Lydon; Shikha Khatri; Shannon M Hawkins; Richard E Leach; Asgerally T Fazleabas; Steven L Young; Bruce A Lessey; Bon Jeong Ku; Jae-Wook Jeong Journal: PLoS Genet Date: 2015-09-17 Impact factor: 5.917
Authors: Mike R Wilson; Jake J Reske; Jeanne Holladay; Genna E Wilber; Mary Rhodes; Julie Koeman; Marie Adams; Ben Johnson; Ren-Wei Su; Niraj R Joshi; Amanda L Patterson; Hui Shen; Richard E Leach; Jose M Teixeira; Asgerally T Fazleabas; Ronald L Chandler Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2019-08-07 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Jake J Reske; Mike R Wilson; Jeanne Holladay; Marc Wegener; Marie Adams; Ronald L Chandler Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 2020-12-18 Impact factor: 6.150
Authors: Valentino Clemente; Asumi Hoshino; Mihir Shetty; Andrew Nelson; Britt K Erickson; Ruth Baker; Nathan Rubin; Mahmoud Khalifa; S John Weroha; Emil Lou; Martina Bazzaro Journal: Cancer Res Commun Date: 2022-08-10
Authors: Xiyin Wang; Mariana S L Praça; Jillian R H Wendel; Robert E Emerson; Francesco J DeMayo; John P Lydon; Shannon M Hawkins Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 2021-04-18 Impact factor: 5.770
Authors: Eleftherios P Samartzis; S Intidhar Labidi-Galy; Michele Moschetta; Mario Uccello; Dimitrios R Kalaitzopoulos; J Alejandro Perez-Fidalgo; Stergios Boussios Journal: Ann Transl Med Date: 2020-12
Authors: Mike R Wilson; Jake J Reske; Jeanne Holladay; Subechhya Neupane; Julie Ngo; Nina Cuthrell; Marc Wegener; Mary Rhodes; Marie Adams; Rachael Sheridan; Galen Hostetter; Fahad T Alotaibi; Paul J Yong; Michael S Anglesio; Bruce A Lessey; Richard E Leach; Jose M Teixeira; Stacey A Missmer; Asgerally T Fazleabas; Ronald L Chandler Journal: Cell Rep Date: 2020-11-10 Impact factor: 9.423