Literature DB >> 31886573

#recovery: Understanding recovery from the lens of recovery-focused blogs posted by individuals with lived experience.

Therese E Kenny1, Sarah L Boyle1, Stephen P Lewis1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Definitions of eating disorder (ED) recovery have primarily focused on symptom management (i.e., weight regain, reduced/absent ED behaviors, and normalized ED thoughts). Notwithstanding the importance of these approaches, there are arguably additional considerations in ED recovery. In order to get a more comprehensive understanding of recovery, it is necessary to turn to individuals with lived experience. Here, we examine how individuals with lived experience of an ED conceptualize and define recovery in narrative, recovery-focused blogs and consider how this understanding may contribute to definitions of recovery in the field.
METHOD: Inductive thematic analysis was used to examine 168 blogs posted by at least 120 unique authors (95% women; 36% reporting anorexia nervosa diagnosis) to 10 moderated, ED websites.
RESULTS: Results from the thematic analysis yielded seven themes: recovery as (1) existing in contrast to the ED, (2) existing in a broader context, (3) subjective, (4) a choice, (5) a complex, nonlinear process, (6) transformative, and (7) overcoming. DISCUSSION: The present findings are consistent with previous qualitative research, suggesting that recovery is multifaceted and encompasses more than just symptom management. Notably, bloggers highlighted that recovery may not be equally attainable for all individuals, citing numerous social justice issues in the conceptualization of recovery. This multifaceted and intersectional view of recovery is consistent with consumer models of recovery. We argue that a dimensional model of recovery may be a good starting framework for researchers and clinicians to develop a more comprehensive definition of recovery.
© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  blog; eating disorders; lived experience; online communication; recovery

Year:  2019        PMID: 31886573     DOI: 10.1002/eat.23221

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Eat Disord        ISSN: 0276-3478            Impact factor:   4.861


  6 in total

1.  Binge Eating Disorder Is a Social Justice Issue: A Cross-Sectional Mixed-Methods Study of Binge Eating Disorder Experts' Opinions.

Authors:  Brenna Bray; Chris Bray; Ryan Bradley; Heather Zwickey
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 4.614

Review 2.  A Retrospective Literature Review of Eating Disorder Research (1990-2021): Application of Bibliometrics and Topical Trends.

Authors:  Eunhye Park; Woo-Hyuk Kim
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 4.614

3.  What Topics Do Members of the Eating Disorder Online Community Discuss and Empathize with? An Application of Big Data Analytics.

Authors:  Eunhye Park; Woo-Hyuk Kim; Sung-Bum Kim
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-18

4.  Anorexia and Young Womens' Personal Networks: Size, Structure, and Kinship.

Authors:  Oxana Mikhaylova; Sofia Dokuka
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-04-19

5.  Lived experience perspectives on a definition of eating disorder recovery in a sample of predominantly white women: a mixed method study.

Authors:  Therese E Kenny; Kathryn Trottier; Stephen P Lewis
Journal:  J Eat Disord       Date:  2022-10-13

6.  Exploring Eating Disorder Topics on Twitter: Machine Learning Approach.

Authors:  Sicheng Zhou; Yunpeng Zhao; Jiang Bian; Ann F Haynos; Rui Zhang
Journal:  JMIR Med Inform       Date:  2020-10-30
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.