| Literature DB >> 31886335 |
Johnny J Kenth1,2,3, Gabrielle Thompson3, Stuart Wilkinson4, Simon Jones2,5, I A Bruce2,3.
Abstract
Mucopolysaccharidoses type IVA (Morquio disease) is a rare, autosomal recessive lysosomal storage disease that causes both obstructive and restrictive airway pathology, with respiratory failure being the primary cause of death. This article provides original data on the longitudinal characterization of pulmonary function changes in children with Mucopolysaccharidoses (MPS) IVA by presenting the data and nuanced trends of changes from sequential spirometry and oximetry. The sample size included 16 subjects, 13 had undergone enzyme replacement therapy (ERT), three had not undergone ERT treatment. A total of 180 individual plots are presented for spirometry variables (FEV1, FEV1 [%Pred] FVC, FVC [%Pred] and FEV1/FVC), 6MWT and oximetry variables (median %Spo2, ODI 3%, mean nadir 3%, ODI 4%, mean nadir 4% and min dip SpO2 [%]); over a nine-year period at a single quaternary paediatric metabolic centre. This data has been made public and has utility to clinicians and researchers due to the following: [1,2] by providing the first comprehensive report of detailed changes in pulmonary function in children with MPS IVA, with and without ERT; [1-3] as well as changes in pulmonary function following the institution of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) and adenotonsillectomy. The data presented is related to the research article by Kenth et al. "The Characterization of Pulmonary Function in Patients with Mucopolysaccharidoses IVA: A Longitudinal Analysis". CrownEntities:
Keywords: Enzyme replacement therapy; MPS; Morquio syndrome; Mucopolysaccharidosis IVA; Respiratory changes; Sleep-disordered breathing
Year: 2019 PMID: 31886335 PMCID: PMC6920461 DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2019.104756
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Data Brief ISSN: 2352-3409
Baseline demographics.
| Patient | Presentation | Age at Diagnosis | Consanguinity | Sex | Genetics | Age ERT started | Age at 1st spirometry | Age at 1st oximetry | OSA | Adeno-tonsillectomy | BIPAP | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ERT treated subjects | |||||||||||||||||||
| A | Difficulty walking | 37 | No | F | Heterozygous p.(Gly155Arg) | 43 | 51 | 38 | No | No | No | ||||||||
| B | Gibbus | 27 | No | M | Homozygous p.(A291T) | 112 | 105 | 106 | Yes | Yes (72, 147) | Yes | ||||||||
| C | Gibbus | 22 | N/A | M | Not recognised gene | 39 | 71 | 39 | Yes | (41) | No | ||||||||
| D | Difficulty walking | 18 | No | M | Homogenous p.(w141×) | 78 | 91 | 88 | Yes | No | Yes | ||||||||
| E | Difficulty walking, scoliosis | 30 | N/A | F | N/A | 67 | 67 | 67 | No | No | No | ||||||||
| F | Chest deformity | 43 | No | F | Heterozygous p.(arg251Ter) | 69 | 124 | 74 | Yes | Yes (121) | No | ||||||||
| G | N/A | 132 | No | M | Homozygous p.(A291T) | 78 | 132 | 122 | Yes | Yes (70, 142) | Yes | ||||||||
| H | N/A | 35 | N/A | F | c.423-11_425del14/c.860C > T | 38 | 48 | Yes | Yes (32, 51, 89) | No | |||||||||
| I | Family history, chest deformity | 31 | No | M | Hetero/l113F, Y240C | 183 | 155 | 155 | Yes | Yes (36) | No | ||||||||
| J | Difficulty walking | 131 | Yes | F | Homozygous p. (His166Arg) | 175 | 141 | 133 | Yes | No | No | ||||||||
| K | Gibbus | 14 | No | M | Heterogenous p. (l113F) and p. (R386H) | 43 | 82 | 24 | Yes | Yes (35) | No | ||||||||
| L | Difficulty walking | 73 | No | F | Heterozygous p.(tyr254cys) and p. (Gln311Pro) | 108 | 118 | 105 | No | No | No | ||||||||
| M | Gibbus, stiff joints | 33 | Yes | F | Homozygous p.(A291T) | 129 | 101 | 100 | No | Yes (121) | No | ||||||||
| Non ERT treated subjects | |||||||||||||||||||
| N | Difficulty walking | 29 | No | M | Homogenous p.(Ser264Asn) | N/A | 102 | 31 | Yes | No | Yes | ||||||||
| O | Growth, skeletal dysplasia | 96 | N/A | F | Homogenous p. (Gly116Val) | N/A | 102 | 98 | Yes | Yes (134) | Yes | ||||||||
| P | Difficulty walking | 161 | N/A | F | Heterozygous p.901G > T (Gly301Cys) | N/A | 160 | N/A | No | No | No | ||||||||
Table 1 above illustrates the baseline demographics of the 16 subjects, including age at diagnosis, consanguinity, what the presenting symptom was, the genetic mutation identified, the date when ERT therapy commenced (if applicable), the age at first spirometry test and the age at first oximetry. We also record whether the child was diagnosed with obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA), if they had undergone an adenotonsillectomy and the whether the child had been instituted on non-invasive, bilevel ventilation (BIPAP).
All ages are reported in months.
Summary of spirometry data.
| Subject | FEV1 [Litres] | FEV1 [%pred.] | FVC [Litres] | FVC [%pred.] | FEV1:FVC | 6MWT [Metres] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 0.60 [0.44–0.71] {↓} | 82 [61–83] | 0.71 [0.61–0.73] {↑} | 83 [82–96] | 0.82 [0.72–1.0] {↓} | 253 [204–294 {↓} |
| B | 0.76 [0.59–0.04] {↓} | 66 [22–97] | 1.04 [0.92–1.18] {↑} | 79 [29–96] | 0.72 [0.53–0.92] {↓} | 317 [0–452] |
| C | 0.48 [0.33–0.58] {↑} | 60 [41–64] | 0.52 [0.36–0.62]{↑} | 53 [38–59] | 0.94 [0.88–0.98] {→} | 180.5 [0–246] {↓} |
| D | 0.60 [0.41–0.67] {↓} | 75 [51–88] | 0.8 [0.59–0.85] {↑} | 83 [66–90] | 0.8 [0.4–0.97] | N/A |
| E | 0.46 [0.31–0.64] {→} | 71 [28–87] | 0.51 [0.39–0.57 {↑} | 72 [43–90] | 0.94 [0.61–0.98] {↓} | 223 [100–349] {↓} |
| F | 0.66 [0.64–0.67] {↓} | 63 [60–66] | 0.96 [0.94–0.98] {↓} | 85 [82–88] | 0.682 [0.68–0.684] {↓} | 283 [159–318] {→} |
| G | 0.72 [0.57–0.84] {→} | 79 [32–101] {↓} | 0.93 [0.8–1.01] {↑} | 91.5 [47–109] {↓} | 0.68 [0.63–0.86] {→} | 305 [0–395] |
| I | 1.32 [1.23–1.43]{↑} | 95 [65–101] | 1.51 [1.33–1.73] {↑} | 88 [79-93 | 0.91 [0.75–0.92] {↓} | 150 [0–300] |
| J | 2.07 [1.7–2.25] {↑} | 108 [96–122] {→} | 1.95 [1.31–2.56] {↑} | 102 [94–114] {→} | 0.91 [0.88–1.63] {→} | 241.5 [110–442] {↑} |
| K | 0.37 [0.2–0.4] {↑} | 44 [26–53] | 0.42 [0.26–0.47] {↑} | 46 [29–47] | 0.83 [0.75–0.95] {→} | 397 [346–437] {→} |
| M | 0.66 [0.62–0.72] {↓} | 83 [62–96] | 0.78 [0.7–0.96 {↑} | 89 [81–90] | 0.85 [0.65–0.96] {↑} | N/A |
| N | 0.27 [0.22–0.34] {↑} | 35 [29-44 | 0.31 [0.25–0.37] {↑} | 36 [28–45] | 0.88 [0.87–0.92] {↑} | N/A |
| O | 0.37 [0.2–0.42] {↓} | 49 [22–56] | 0.4 [0.31–0.48] {↓} | 49 [30–56] | 0.88 [0.65–0.95] {↓} | N/A |
Kenth et al. [1].
The table above illustrates the values for the 5 variables measured during spirometry for each subject - FEV1, Forced Expiratory Volume in the first second (Litres); FVC, Forced Vital Capacity, (Litres); as well as the six-minute walking test (6MWT). Median values are displayed in bold, minimum and maximum range are in square brackets. Curly braces {} denote the overall trends of the variable throughout the study: ↑, trend increased; ↓ trend decreased; →, no change. Subjects A-M (highlighted in yellow) were the ERT treated subjects, whilst subjects N and O (highlighted in pink) were untreated.
Fig. 1Forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) changes.
The above graphs demonstrates each of the individual plots where constructed to ascertain the changes in pulmonary function over time for the given variable. The starting timepoint in the ERT group was shortly after ERT therapy had commenced. Data points are in blue and a line of best fit creating a regression line was created to ascertain the overall trend of whether there was a decline or improvement. For each of the regression curve the intercept and R2 value is sated under the curve. Note also, the solid red and orange bars, that mark when a therapeutic intervention was undertaken. The solid vertical, red line (−) indicates when adenotonsillectomy was undertaken and the orange line (−) illustrates when NIV was instituted. There was incomplete data for some individuals, as adenotonsillectomy was undertaken prior to formal diagnosis and thus full lung function tests would not of been undertaken at the time. Subjects A to M were ERT treated and data recorded was post commencing ERT therapy; subjects N and O were not ERT treated and data was recorded after diagnosis.
Fig. 2FEV1 as percentage of predicted, (FEV1 [%pred]).
Fig. 3Forced vital capacity (FVC).
Fig. 4FVC [% predicted].
Fig. 5FEV1/FVC ratio.
Fig. 6Six minute walk test (6MWT).
The above graphs demonstrates each of the individual plots where constructed to ascertain the changes in pulmonary function over time for the given variable. Data points are in blue and a line of best fit creating a regression line was created to ascertain the overall trend of whether there was a decline or improvement. Note also, the solid red and orange bars, that mark when a therapeutic intervention was undertaken. The solid red line (−) indicates when adenotonsillectomy was undertaken and the orange line (−) illustrates when NIV was instituted.
Summary of oximetry results.
| Subject | Oximetry Variable | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Median %Spo2 | ODI 3% | Mean Nadir 3% | ODI 4% | Mean Nadir 4% | Min dip. SpO2 (%) | |
| A | 97 [95.1–98] {→} | 3.5 [2–21.5] {→} | 91.9 [87.3–93.6] {↓} | 2.2 [1–13.9] {→} | 90.9 [86.2–92.4] {↓} | 83.6 [62–90.9] {→} |
| B | 95 [93–97] | 13.6 [2–51.2] {→} | 87.8 [85.6–93.5] {↑} | 7.5 [0.9–45.4] {→} | 87.8 [80–92.8] {↑} | 71 [52.5–87] |
| C | 94.9 [93.6–97.5] {→} | 8.3 [0.4–24.6] {↓} | 88.8 [84.5–90.4] {↓} | 6.5 [2.6–16.7] {→} | 87.9 [84.5–89.6] {↓} | 78 [61.4–87.9] {↓} |
| D | 95 [93.8–97] {↑} | 10 [4.6–25.7] {↑} | 89.1 [85.4–90.7] {→} | 6.6 [2.7–17.2] {↑} | 87.8 [84.6–89.8] {↑} | 71.3 [37.1–89.6] {↓} |
| E | 95.3 [95–96.5] {↑} | 2.5 [1.5–3.8] {↓} | 90.8 [89.5–94.3] {↑} | 1.6 [0.4–3.3] {↓} | 89.6 [87.6–90.3] {↑} | 85.5 [76.6–90.8] {→} |
| F | 95.3 [94.6–95.4] {→} | 9.2 [6.7–10.9] {↑} | 89.3 [89.2–90.8] {↓} | 6.8 [4–8] | 88.6 [87.9–89.6] {↓} | 83.9 [78.2–87.9] {↑} |
| G | 95.3 [94.1–97.3] {↑} | 10.5 [8–17.8] {↓} | 90.3 [88.2–91.6] {↑} | 7.8 [5–13.5] {→} | 89.1 [87.6–90.2] {↑} | 77.8 [82.9–90.2] {↑} |
| H | 97.4 [88.6–99] {↓} | 11.9 [5.7–21.8] {↑} | 87.5 [83.9–94.5] {→} | 6.9 [4.3–17] {↑} | 86.6 [83.1–92.6] {→} | 64 [49.9–86] |
| I | 95.1 [94.6–97] {→} | 8.4 [8.3–9.8] {↓} | 89.8 [89.2–92] {↑} | 5.6 [4.6–6.6] {→} | 88.5 [88.1–90.4] {→} | 79 [62.5–79.5] {→} |
| J | 97.3 [95.8–99] {↑} | 2 [0.9–16.4] {↓} | 90.1 [89.2–94.6] {→} | 1.5 [0.4–9.3] {↓} | 90.4 [89.1–94.3] {→} | 84.6 [76–93.6] {↑} |
| K | 96.1 [95.1–97.1] {↓} | 4 [1.7–4.9] | 91.2 [89.9–92.5] {↓} | 2.2 [0.8–2.6] {→} | 90.7 [88.2–91.8] {↓} | 87.8 [73.2–89.1] {→} |
| M | 95.9 [94.3–97] {→} | 8.8 [7.2–12.9] {→} | 89.3 [88–93.2] {↑} | 6.4 [4.4–8.4] {→} | 88.3 [87–92.1] {↑} | 78 [72.8–92.1] {↑} |
| N | 98.6 [96–100] {→} | 3.5 [0.2–10.8] {↓} | 90.4 [82.3–91.9] {↓} | 2.7 [0–7.9] | 89.1 [87.6–91] {↓} | 84.1 [73–91] |
| O | 94.6 [86–98.9] {↓} | 9.9 [2–80.5] {↓} | 89.3 [88–94.4] {→} | 5.8 [0.8–89.6] {↓} | 88.1 [6.58–93.4] {↑} | 83.5 [66–89.2] {→} |
Kenth et al. [1].
The table above illustrates the values for the 6 variables measured during oximetry testing for each subject. Median values are displayed in bold, minimum and maximum range are in square brackets. Curly braces {} denote the overall trends of the variable throughout the study: ↑, trend increased; ↓ trend decreased; →, no change in trend. ODI 3%, ≥3% arterial oxygen desaturations/hour; ODI 4%, ≥4% arterial oxygen desaturations/hour; min dip SpO2, minimum dips in oxygen saturations. Subjects A-M (highlighted in yellow) were the ERT treated subjects, whilst subjects N and O (highlighted in pink) were untreated.
Fig. 7Median Spo2%.
Fig. 8Oxygen desaturation index (ODI) 3% from baseline.
Fig. 9Mean nadir 3%.
Fig. 10Odi 4%.
Fig. 11Mean nadir 4%.
Fig. 12Minimum dips in % SpO2.
Specifications Table
| Subject area | |
| More specific subject area | |
| Type of data | |
| How data was acquired | |
| Data format | |
| Experimental factors | |
| Experimental features | |
| Data source location | |
| Data accessibility | |
| Related research article |
The data presented are the first comparison of enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) and non-ERT treated, in terms of the long-term decline in pulmonary function. The data is grounded from longitudinal, standardized, repeated measurements taken from spirometry and oximetry studies. The data is the first to report on the long-term changes in pulmonary function after an intervention such as non-invasive ventilation (NIV) and adenotonsillectomy. These data are useful to clinicians and researchers evaluating the safety and efficacy of ERT on children with MPS IVA, especially within the context of evaluating airway respiratory changes. |