| Literature DB >> 31885811 |
Graziamaria Corbi1, Valeria Conti2, Jacopo Troisi2,3,4, Angelo Colucci2,3, Valentina Manzo2, Paola Di Pietro2, Maria Consiglia Calabrese2, Albino Carrizzo5, Carmine Vecchione2,5, Nicola Ferrara6,7, Amelia Filippelli2.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Exercise training induces beneficial effects also by increasing levels of Sirtuin 1 (Sirt1) and β-hydroxybutyrate (βOHB). Up to date, no studies investigated the role of exercise training-based cardiac rehabilitation (ET-CR) programs on βOHB levels. Therefore, the present study is aimed at investigating whether a supervised 4-week ET-CR program was able to induce changes in Sirt1 activity and βOHB levels and to evaluate the possible relationship between such parameters, in Heart Failure with preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF) patients.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31885811 PMCID: PMC6900956 DOI: 10.1155/2019/7049237
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oxid Med Cell Longev ISSN: 1942-0994 Impact factor: 6.543
Main characteristics of total population and ET-CR group at baseline.
| Variables | Total population | Ctr | ET-CR |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years), mean ± SD | 69.5 ± 4.3 | 70.25 ± 4.7 | 69.20 ± 4.1 | 0.357 |
| BMI (kg/m2), mean ± SD | 27.6 ± 3.2 | 26.7 ± 3.3 | 27.9 ± 3.1 | 0.154 |
| SBP (mmHg), mean ± SD | 120.9 ± 11.0 | 119.3 ± 11.0 | 121.5 ± 11.0 | 0.443 |
| DBP (mmHg), mean ± SD | 71.7 ± 5.7 | 71.0 ± 5.3 | 72.0 ± 5.9 | 0.511 |
| EF (%), mean ± SD | 56.7 ± 4.0 | 57.9 ± 3.8 | 56.2 ± 4.0 | 0.117 |
| LVEDD (mm) | 52.27 ± 4.27 | 52.95 ± 4.19 | 52.00 ± 4.35 | 0.404 |
| CAD, | 14 (71.4) | 14 (70) | 36 (72) | 0.542 |
| PTCA, | 37 (52.9) | 11 (55) | 26 (52) | 0.516 |
| CABG, | 10 (14.3) | 3 (15) | 7 (14) | 0.59 |
| Previous IMA, | 47 (67.1) | 13 (65) | (68) | 0.51 |
| Valvular substitution, | 3 (4.3) | 1 (5) | 2 (4) | 0.642 |
| Smoking, | 37 (52.9) | 9 (45) | 28 (56) | 0.285 |
| Hypertension, | 30 (42.9) | 8 (40) | 22 (44) | 0.487 |
| Dislipidemia, | 31 (44.3) | 9 (45) | 22 (44) | 0.574 |
| Diabetes, | 14 (20) | 4 (20) | 10 (20) | 0.619 |
| COPD, | 13 (18.6) | 4 (20) | 9 (18) | 0.545 |
| Beta blockers | 64 (91.4) | 18 (90) | 46 (92) | 0.556 |
| ACE inhibitors | 32 (45.7) | 9 (45) | 23 (46) | 0.576 |
| ARBs | 9 (12.9) | 2 (10) | 7 (14) | 0.495 |
| Diuretics | 20 (28.6) | 5 (25) | 15 (30) | 0.458 |
| Ca2 antagonists | 7 (10) | 2 (10) | 5 (10) | 0.652 |
| Aspirin | 56 (80) | 15 (75) | 41 (82) | 0.361 |
| Anticoagulants | 33 (47.1) | 9 (45) | 24 (48) | 0.516 |
| Oral hypoglycemics | 11 (15.7) | 4 (20) | 7 (14) | 0.385 |
| Insulin | 5 (7.1) | 1 (5) | 4 (8) | 0.556 |
| Statin | 53 (75.7) | 15 (75) | 38 (76) | 0.578 |
Data are expressed as the mean ± SD or number of subjects (%). BMI: body mass index; SBP: systolic blood pressure; DPB: diastolic blood pressure; EF: ejection fraction; LVEDD: left end diastolic diameter; CAD: coronary artery disease; PTCA: percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty; CABG: coronary artery bypass graft; COPD: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; ARBs: angiotensin II receptor blockers.
Changes in some hemodynamic variables in HFpEF controls and HFpEF patients who underwent ET-CR.
| Variables | Ctr |
| ET-CR |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | After 4 weeks | Baseline | After 4 weeks | |||
| SBP (mmHg), mean ± SD | 119.3 ± 11.0 | 119.75 ± 10.6 | 0.163 | 121.5 ± 11.0 | 120.26 ± 8.8 |
|
| DBP (mmHg), mean ± SD | 71.0 ± 5.3 | 71.5 ± 5.2 | 0.163 | 72.0 ± 5.9 | 71.8 ± 5.3 | 0.159 |
| EF (%), mean ± SD | 57.9 ± 3.8 | 57.6 ± 3.5 | 0.110 | 56.2 ± 4.0 | 57.22 ± 3.19 |
|
| LVEDD (mm) | 52.95 ± 4.19 | 53.15 ± 4.23 | 0.428 | 52.0 ± 4.35 | 51.86 ± 3.96 | 0.442 |
SBP: systolic blood pressure; DPB: diastolic blood pressure; EF: ejection fraction; LVEDD: left end diastolic diameter.
Changes in oxidant/antioxidant parameters in HFpEF controls and HFpEF patients who underwent ET-CR.
| Variables | Ctr |
| ET-CR |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | After 4 weeks | Baseline | After 4 weeks | |||
| SIRT1 activity (AU) | 1941.80 ± 149.35 | 1942.16 ± 149.67 | 0.560 | 1953.14 ± 125.06 | 2082.44 ± 108.68∗ | <0.0001 |
|
| 47.96 ± 4.84 | 49.35 ± 5.21 | 0.280 | 48.76 ± 3.27 | 61.58 ± 6.91∗ | <0.0001 |
| Ox-LDL (pg/mL) | 3227.62 ± 281.13 | 3255.33 ± 388.57 | 0.492 | 3286.49 ± 527.08 | 2380.47 ± 608.30∗ | <0.0001 |
| TEAC (mmol Trolox Equiv/L) | 0.295 ± 0.084 | 0.286 ± 0.722 | 0.075 | 0.290 ± 0.723 | 0.425 ± 0.061∗ | <0.0001 |
| NAD+ | 19.74 ± 2.03 | 18.41 ± 2.49 | 0.136 | 19.50 ± 1.48 | 21.64 ± 1.27∗ | <0.0001 |
| NADH | 12.26 ± 1.43 | 13.25 ± 1.67 | 0.090 | 12.16 ± 0.97 | 11.15 ± 1.09∗ | <0.001 |
| NAD+/NADH | 1.64 ± 0.32 | 1.44 ± 0.40 | 0.115 | 1.62 ± 0.24 | 1.96 ± 0.28∗ | <0.0001 |
ET-CR: exercise training-based cardiac rehabilitation; βOHB: β-hydroxybutyrate; Ox-LDL: Oxidized Low-Density Lipoprotein. ∗CR vs. Ctr after 4 weeks, p < 0.0001.
Figure 1Changes in control and ET-CR groups of Sirt1 activity, β-hydroxybutyrate, Ox-LDL levels, and TEAC from baseline to 4 weeks after the study start. The ET-CR was able to induce a significant increase in Sirt1 activity (a) and β-hydroxybutyrate (βOHB) (b) (both, p < 0.0001); a reduction in Ox-LDL (c) (p < 0.001) and increased levels of antioxidant response measured by TEAC assay (d) (p < 0.0001), as showed by the difference between the levels after 4 weeks minus the levels at baseline.
Figure 2Changes in the control and ET-CR groups of Sirt1 activity, NAD+, NADH levels, and NAD+/NADH ratio from baseline to 4 weeks after the study start. The ET-CR was able to induce a significant increase in NAD+ (a), Sirt1 activity (b), and NAD+/NADH ratio (c) (all p < 0.0001), associated with a reduction in NADH levels (d) (p < 0.001), expressed as the difference between the levels after 4 weeks minus the levels at baseline.
Figure 3Linear regression correlation among delta Sirt1 activity and delta oxidants and antioxidants. (a) Linear regression correlation between TEAC and delta Sirt1 activity. (b) Linear regression correlation between delta TEAC and delta βOHB levels. (c) Linear regression correlation between delta Ox-LDL and delta Sirt1 activity. (d) Linear regression correlation between delta NAD+ and delta Sirt1 activity. (e) Linear regression correlation between delta βOHB levels and delta Sirt1 activity.