| Literature DB >> 31885680 |
Chenfei Shi1, Yan Xue1, Chuan Jiang1, Hui Tian1, Bei Liu1.
Abstract
Endoscopic diagnosis is an important means for gastric polyp detection. In this paper, a panoramic image of gastroscopy is developed, which can display the inner surface of the stomach intuitively and comprehensively. Moreover, the proposed automatic detection solution can help doctors locate the polyps automatically and reduce missed diagnosis. The main contributions of this paper are firstly, a gastroscopic panorama reconstruction method is developed. The reconstruction does not require additional hardware devices and can solve the problem of texture dislocation and illumination imbalance properly; secondly, an end-to-end multiobject detection for gastroscopic panorama is trained based on a deep learning framework. Compared with traditional solutions, the automatic polyp detection system can locate all polyps in the inner wall of the stomach in real time and assist doctors to find the lesions. Thirdly, the system was evaluated in the Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University. The results show that the average error of the panorama is less than 2 mm, the accuracy of the polyp detection is 95%, and the recall rate is 99%. In addition, the research roadmap of this paper has guiding significance for endoscopy-assisted detection of other human soft cavities.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31885680 PMCID: PMC6925673 DOI: 10.1155/2019/4393124
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comput Math Methods Med ISSN: 1748-670X Impact factor: 2.238
Figure 1Polyps detection in traditional procedure. The lesions are determined by ink injection, but the ink may fade away before second examination. And reflective areas can be found on the captured images.
Figure 2The pipeline of our method. Original endoscopic images are used to generate panoramic result. Then, polyps are detected with our deep learning framework.
Figure 3(a) is originally captured by endoscope, and the chessboard is badly distorted (red line can be considered as reference). (b) is calibrated results.
Figure 4Five tested method registration results. From (a) to (f), the registration methods were applied to original gastroscopic and noise images (the Gaussian noise scalar varies from 0.01 to 0.5). For each registration method, the initial detected feature number was 200, thus the ideal matching features' number was also 200. In the figures, the color curves represent the number of the detected features whose FB error is smaller than the corresponding FB error threshold (unit: pixels). The figure is quoted from [15, 16]. (a) Original Image. (b) Gaussian's scalar = 0.01. (c) Gaussian's scalar = 0.05. (d) Gaussian's scalar = 0.1. (e) Gaussian's scalar = 0.2. (f) Gaussian's scalar = 0.5. (g) Legends of the curves.
Different deep learning framework for polyp detection.
| Accuracy | Recall | |
|---|---|---|
| Selective SSD | 95% | 100% |
| Original SSD | 84% | 75% |
| Faster RCNN | 81% | 84% |
| RCNN | 79% | 71% |
Volunteer information.
| Accuracy percent | |
|---|---|
| Average age (range) | 54 (40–64) |
| Male | 32 (75%) |
| Smoke | 27 (65%) |
| Alcohol | 39 (90%) |
| Intestinal metaplasia (mild/moderate/severe) | 0/12/31 |
Figure 5The experimental result.
Quantitative evaluation about panorama results (43 volunteers). We evaluate the error score between Liu's [18] method and our method. The overall texture error of ours is 0.33, which is much better than [18]. Moreover, we also evaluate the results on angularis, antrum, and stomach body, respectively, and our method is better.
| Texture metric error | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Angularis | Antrum | Stomach body | Overall | |
| Liu's method [ | 0.53 | 0.49 | 0.44 | 0.49 |
| Our method | 0.38 | 0.35 | 0.27 | 0.33 |
Polyp detection compared with clinical diagnosis. We evaluate the recall percentage and accuracy from different physiological location.
| Clinical diagnosis | Our method | Recall percentage | IOU >0.5 | IOU ≤0.5 | Accuracy | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Angularis | 58 | 58 | 100% | 2 | 56 | 96.5% |
| Antrum | 71 | 71 | 100% | 4 | 67 | 94.4% |
| Stomach body | 40 | 40 | 100% | 1 | 39 | 97.5% |