Literature DB >> 31885414

Investigating the US biomedical workforce: Gender, field of training, and retention.

Anne E Winkler1, Sharon G Levin1, Michael T Allison1.   

Abstract

The biomedical research workforce plays a crucial role in fostering economic growth and improving public health through discoveries and innovations. This study fills a knowledge gap by providing a comprehensive portrait of this workforce and retention within it. A distinguishing feature is that we use an occupation-based definition which allows us to look 'backward' to field of training and assess the extent to which it has grown more interdisciplinary, and how this differs by gender. The analysis is conducted using restricted-use SESTAT data, the most comprehensive dataset on the scientific workforce in the USA, for the years 1993, 2003, and 2010. Among the findings, we identify differences in interdisciplinarity in training by gender, and these differences have widened. In the retention analysis, which focuses on the 7-year period, 2003-10, we find that retention is negatively and significantly associated with interdisciplinary training for women, but not for men.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biomedical workforce; gender; stem workforce

Year:  2019        PMID: 31885414      PMCID: PMC6922008          DOI: 10.1093/scipol/scz039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Public Policy        ISSN: 0302-3427


  9 in total

1.  A generation at risk: young investigators and the future of the biomedical workforce.

Authors:  Ronald J Daniels
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-01-05       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The impact of postdoctoral training on early careers in biomedicine.

Authors:  Shulamit Kahn; Donna K Ginther
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 54.908

3.  Why the US science and engineering workforce is aging rapidly.

Authors:  David M Blau; Bruce A Weinberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  The new face of US science.

Authors:  Misty L Heggeness; Kearney T W Gunsalus; José Pacas; Gary McDowell
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Rescuing US biomedical research from its systemic flaws.

Authors:  Bruce Alberts; Marc W Kirschner; Shirley Tilghman; Harold Varmus
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Labor and skills gap analysis of the biomedical research workforce.

Authors:  Julie L Mason; Elizabeth Johnston; Sam Berndt; Katie Segal; Ming Lei; Jonathan S Wiest
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Interdisciplinarity and impact: distinct effects of variety, balance, and disparity.

Authors:  Jian Wang; Bart Thijs; Wolfgang Glänzel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Are recent cohorts of women with engineering bachelors less likely to stay in engineering?

Authors:  Shulamit Kahn; Donna K Ginther
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-08-19

9.  Biomedical Science Ph.D. Career Interest Patterns by Race/Ethnicity and Gender.

Authors:  Kenneth D Gibbs; John McGready; Jessica C Bennett; Kimberly Griffin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.