Literature DB >> 31884467

A Latent Transition Analysis Model to Assess Change in Cognitive States over Three Occasions: Results from the Rush Memory and Aging Project.

Andrea R Zammit1, David A Bennett2, Charles B Hall1, Richard B Lipton1, Mindy J Katz1, Graciela Muniz-Terrera3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Conceptualizing cognitive aging as a step-sequential process is useful in identifying particular stages of cognitive function and impairment.
OBJECTIVE: We applied latent transition analysis (LTA) to determine 1) whether the underlying structure of cognitive profiles found at every measurement occasion are uniform across three waves of assessment, 2) whether class-instability is predictive of distal outcomes, and 3) whether class-reversions from impaired to non-impaired using latent modelling is lower than when using clinical criteria of mild cognitive impairment (MCI).
METHODS: A mover-stayer LTA model with dementia as a distal outcome was specified to model transitions of ten neuropsychological measures over three annual waves in the Rush Memory and Aging Project (n = 1,661). The predictive validity of the mover-stayer status for incident Alzheimer's disease (AD) was then assessed.
RESULTS: We identified a five-class model across the three time-points: Mixed-Domain Impairment, Memory-Specific Impairment, Frontal Impairment, Average, and Superior Cognition. None of the individuals in the Impairment classes reverted to the Average or Superior classes. Conventional MCI classification identified 26.4% and 14.1% at Times 1 and 2 as false-positive cases. "Movers" had 87% increased risk of developing dementia compared to those classified as "Stayers".
CONCLUSION: Our findings support the use of latent variable modelling that incorporates comprehensive neuropsychological assessment to identify and classify cognitive impairment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alzheimer’s disease; cognitive heterogeneity; cognitive profiles; cognitive status; dementia; individual differences; latent transition analysis; neuropsychological zzm321990profiles

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31884467      PMCID: PMC7034515          DOI: 10.3233/JAD-190778

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis        ISSN: 1387-2877            Impact factor:   4.472


  34 in total

1.  Clinical versus mechanical prediction: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  W M Grove; D H Zald; B S Lebow; B E Snitz; C Nelson
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2000-03

2.  MMSE cross-domain variability predicts cognitive decline in centenarians.

Authors:  Matthias Kliegel; Martin Sliwinski
Journal:  Gerontology       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.140

Review 3.  Neuropsychological contributions to the early identification of Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Mark W Bondi; Amy J Jak; Lisa Delano-Wood; Mark W Jacobson; Dean C Delis; David P Salmon
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 7.444

Review 4.  Neuropsychological assessment of dementia.

Authors:  David P Salmon; Mark W Bondi
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 24.137

5.  Neuropsychological latent classes at enrollment and postmortem neuropathology.

Authors:  Andrea R Zammit; Charles B Hall; David A Bennett; Ali Ezzati; Mindy J Katz; Graciela Muniz-Terrera; Richard B Lipton
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 21.566

6.  Overview and findings from the rush Memory and Aging Project.

Authors:  David A Bennett; Julie A Schneider; Aron S Buchman; Lisa L Barnes; Patricia A Boyle; Robert S Wilson
Journal:  Curr Alzheimer Res       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.498

7.  The Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease (CERAD). Part V. A normative study of the neuropsychological battery.

Authors:  K A Welsh; N Butters; R C Mohs; D Beekly; S Edland; G Fillenbaum; A Heyman
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 9.910

8.  Change in cognitive function in older persons from a community population: relation to age and Alzheimer disease.

Authors:  R S Wilson; L A Beckett; D A Bennett; M S Albert; D A Evans
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  1999-10

9.  Integrative data analysis through coordination of measurement and analysis protocol across independent longitudinal studies.

Authors:  Scott M Hofer; Andrea M Piccinin
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2009-06

Review 10.  Religious Orders Study and Rush Memory and Aging Project.

Authors:  David A Bennett; Aron S Buchman; Patricia A Boyle; Lisa L Barnes; Robert S Wilson; Julie A Schneider
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 4.472

View more
  2 in total

1.  Using Mixture Modeling to Construct Subgroups of Cognitive Aging in the Wisconsin Longitudinal Study.

Authors:  Sara M Moorman; Emily A Greenfield; Kyle Carr
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2021-09-13       Impact factor: 4.077

2.  Heterogeneity in Longitudinal Healthcare Utilisation by Older Adults: A Latent Transition Analysis of the Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing.

Authors:  Ann S Doherty; Ruth Miller; John Mallett; Gary Adamson
Journal:  J Aging Health       Date:  2021-09-01
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.