G Pugnet1, M Mounié2, M Lapeyre-Mestre3, G Moulis4, L Sailler5. 1. Université de Toulouse III, 31062 Toulouse, France; Inserm, UMR1027, 31000 Toulouse, France; Service de médecine interne, CHU de Toulouse, 1, place Baylac, 31059 Toulouse cedex 09, France; Centre d'investigation clinique 1436, CHU de Toulouse, 31059 Toulouse, France. Electronic address: pugnet.g@chu-toulouse.fr. 2. Université de Toulouse III, 31062 Toulouse, France; Inserm, UMR1027, 31000 Toulouse, France. 3. Université de Toulouse III, 31062 Toulouse, France; Inserm, UMR1027, 31000 Toulouse, France; Centre d'investigation clinique 1436, CHU de Toulouse, 31059 Toulouse, France; Laboratoire de pharmacologie médicale et clinique, faculté de médecine, université de Toulouse III, 31000 Toulouse, France; Service de pharmacologie clinique, CIC 1436, CHU de Toulouse, 31000 Toulouse, France. 4. Université de Toulouse III, 31062 Toulouse, France; Inserm, UMR1027, 31000 Toulouse, France; Service de médecine interne, CHU de Toulouse, 1, place Baylac, 31059 Toulouse cedex 09, France; Centre d'investigation clinique 1436, CHU de Toulouse, 31059 Toulouse, France. 5. Université de Toulouse III, 31062 Toulouse, France; Inserm, UMR1027, 31000 Toulouse, France; Service de médecine interne, CHU de Toulouse, 1, place Baylac, 31059 Toulouse cedex 09, France.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the rate of seasonal influenza vaccination coverage (IVC) in incident giant cell arteritis (GCA) patients compared with controls. METHODS: The vaccination rate was estimated from vaccine dispensation. IVC was compared between GCA and their controls using longitudinal multivariate Poisson regression. RESULTS: During the influenza campaigns from 2005-2006 to 2010-2011, the IVC rates in the GCA group and the control group ranged from 60.8 to 74.7% vs. 56.6 to 70.4%, respectively. Incident GCA influenza vaccination rate was 20% higher than controls (RR=1.20 ; IC 1.09 to 1.32, P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Although suboptimal, IVC in incident GCA was statistically better than controls.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the rate of seasonal influenza vaccination coverage (IVC) in incident giant cell arteritis (GCA) patients compared with controls. METHODS: The vaccination rate was estimated from vaccine dispensation. IVC was compared between GCA and their controls using longitudinal multivariate Poisson regression. RESULTS: During the influenza campaigns from 2005-2006 to 2010-2011, the IVC rates in the GCA group and the control group ranged from 60.8 to 74.7% vs. 56.6 to 70.4%, respectively. Incident GCA influenza vaccination rate was 20% higher than controls (RR=1.20 ; IC 1.09 to 1.32, P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Although suboptimal, IVC in incident GCA was statistically better than controls.
Authors: Cyril Dumain; Jonathan Broner; Erik Arnaud; Emmanuel Dewavrin; Jan Holubar; Myriam Fantone; Benoit de Wazières; Simon Parreau; Pierre Fesler; Philippe Guilpain; Camille Roubille; Radjiv Goulabchand Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-05-31 Impact factor: 4.964