Literature DB >> 31883270

Operating characteristics of the rank-based inverse normal transformation for quantitative trait analysis in genome-wide association studies.

Zachary R McCaw1, Jacqueline M Lane2, Richa Saxena2, Susan Redline3, Xihong Lin1,4.   

Abstract

Quantitative traits analyzed in Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS) are often nonnormally distributed. For such traits, association tests based on standard linear regression are subject to reduced power and inflated type I error in finite samples. Applying the rank-based inverse normal transformation (INT) to nonnormally distributed traits has become common practice in GWAS. However, the different variations on INT-based association testing have not been formally defined, and guidance is lacking on when to use which approach. In this paper, we formally define and systematically compare the direct (D-INT) and indirect (I-INT) INT-based association tests. We discuss their assumptions, underlying generative models, and connections. We demonstrate that the relative powers of D-INT and I-INT depend on the underlying data generating process. Since neither approach is uniformly most powerful, we combine them into an adaptive omnibus test (O-INT). O-INT is robust to model misspecification, protects the type I error, and is well powered against a wide range of nonnormally distributed traits. Extensive simulations were conducted to examine the finite sample operating characteristics of these tests. Our results demonstrate that, for nonnormally distributed traits, INT-based tests outperform the standard untransformed association test, both in terms of power and type I error rate control. We apply the proposed methods to GWAS of spirometry traits in the UK Biobank. O-INT has been implemented in the R package RNOmni, which is available on CRAN.
© 2019 The International Biometric Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  direct and indirect rank-based inverse normal transformation; nonnormality; omnibus test; quantitative traits; transformation; type I error rate

Year:  2020        PMID: 31883270     DOI: 10.1111/biom.13214

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  20 in total

1.  BEXCIS: Bayesian methods for estimating the degree of the skewness of X chromosome inactivation.

Authors:  Wen-Yi Yu; Yu Zhang; Meng-Kai Li; Zi-Ying Yang; Wing Kam Fung; Pei-Zhen Zhao; Ji-Yuan Zhou
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 3.307

2.  People with HIV have higher percentages of circulating CCR5+ CD8+ T cells and lower percentages of CCR5+ regulatory T cells.

Authors:  Louise E van Eekeren; Vasiliki Matzaraki; Zhenhua Zhang; Lisa van de Wijer; Marc J T Blaauw; Marien I de Jonge; Linos Vandekerckhove; Wim Trypsteen; Leo A B Joosten; Mihai G Netea; Quirijn de Mast; Hans J P M Koenen; Yang Li; André J A M van der Ven
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  Power loss due to testing association between covariate-adjusted traits and genetic variants.

Authors:  Pranav Yajnik; Michael Boehnke
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 2.135

4.  Association of Genetic Variation With Cirrhosis: A Multi-Trait Genome-Wide Association and Gene-Environment Interaction Study.

Authors:  Connor A Emdin; Mary Haas; Veeral Ajmera; Tracey G Simon; Julian Homburger; Cynthia Neben; Lan Jiang; Wei-Qi Wei; Qiping Feng; Alicia Zhou; Joshua Denny; Kathleen Corey; Rohit Loomba; Sekar Kathiresan; Amit V Khera
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 22.682

5.  Rare coding variants in DNA damage repair genes associated with timing of natural menopause.

Authors:  Lucas D Ward; Margaret M Parker; Aimee M Deaton; Ho-Chou Tu; Alexander O Flynn-Carroll; Gregory Hinkle; Paul Nioi
Journal:  HGG Adv       Date:  2021-12-22

6.  Detection of Parent-of-Origin Effects for the Variants Associated With Behavioral Disinhibition in the MCTFR Data.

Authors:  Yi-Fan Kong; Meng-Kai Li; Yu-Xin Yuan; Zi-Ying Yang; Wen-Yi Yu; Pei-Zhen Zhao; Ji-Yuan Zhou
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 4.772

7.  Clinical laboratory test-wide association scan of polygenic scores identifies biomarkers of complex disease.

Authors:  Jessica K Dennis; Julia M Sealock; Peter Straub; Younga H Lee; Donald Hucks; Ky'Era Actkins; Annika Faucon; Yen-Chen Anne Feng; Tian Ge; Slavina B Goleva; Maria Niarchou; Kritika Singh; Theodore Morley; Jordan W Smoller; Douglas M Ruderfer; Jonathan D Mosley; Guanhua Chen; Lea K Davis
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 11.117

8.  Robustification of GWAS to explore effective SNPs addressing the challenges of hidden population stratification and polygenic effects.

Authors:  Zobaer Akond; Md Asif Ahsan; Munirul Alam; Md Nurul Haque Mollah
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Large-scale machine-learning-based phenotyping significantly improves genomic discovery for optic nerve head morphology.

Authors:  Babak Alipanahi; Farhad Hormozdiari; Babak Behsaz; Justin Cosentino; Zachary R McCaw; Emanuel Schorsch; D Sculley; Elizabeth H Dorfman; Paul J Foster; Lily H Peng; Sonia Phene; Naama Hammel; Andrew Carroll; Anthony P Khawaja; Cory Y McLean
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 11.025

10.  GWAS of serum ALT and AST reveals an association of SLC30A10 Thr95Ile with hypermanganesemia symptoms.

Authors:  Lucas D Ward; Ho-Chou Tu; Chelsea B Quenneville; Shira Tsour; Alexander O Flynn-Carroll; Margaret M Parker; Aimee M Deaton; Patrick A J Haslett; Luca A Lotta; Niek Verweij; Manuel A R Ferreira; Aris Baras; Gregory Hinkle; Paul Nioi
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-07-27       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.