Literature DB >> 31883103

The role of genetic constraints and social environment in explaining female extra-pair mating.

Daiping Wang1, Wolfgang Forstmeier1, Katrin Martin1, Alastair Wilson2, Bart Kempenaers1.   

Abstract

Why do females of socially monogamous species engage in extra-pair copulations? This long-standing question remains a puzzle, because the benefits of female promiscuous behavior often do not seem to outweigh the costs. Genetic constraint models offer an answer by proposing that female promiscuity emerges through selection favoring alleles that are either beneficial for male reproductive success (intersexual pleiotropy hypothesis) or beneficial for female fecundity (intrasexual pleiotropy hypothesis). A previous quantitative genetic study on captive zebra finches, Taeniopygia guttata, reported support for the first, but not for the second hypothesis. Here, we re-examine both hypotheses based on data from lines selected for high and low male courtship rate. In contrast to previous conclusions, our new analyses clearly reject the hypothesis that male and female promiscuity are genetically homologous traits. We find some support for a positive genetic correlation between female promiscuity and fecundity. This study also shows that the behavioral outcome of extra-pair courtships primarily depends on individual-specific female preferences and not on the "attractiveness" of the social mate. In contrast, patterns of paternity are strongly influenced by the social partner and the pair bond, presumably reflecting variation in copulation behavior, fertility, or sperm competitiveness.
© 2019 The Authors. Evolution © 2019 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fecundity; female EPP; promiscuity; quantitative genetics; selection lines

Year:  2020        PMID: 31883103     DOI: 10.1111/evo.13905

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  3 in total

Review 1.  No evidence of immediate fitness benefits of within-season divorce in monogamous birds.

Authors:  Antica Culina; Lyanne Brouwer
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 3.812

2.  Fitness costs of female choosiness are low in a socially monogamous songbird.

Authors:  Wolfgang Forstmeier; Daiping Wang; Katrin Martin; Bart Kempenaers
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2021-11-04       Impact factor: 8.029

3.  Machine learning reveals cryptic dialects that explain mate choice in a songbird.

Authors:  Daiping Wang; Wolfgang Forstmeier; Damien R Farine; Adriana A Maldonado-Chaparro; Katrin Martin; Yifan Pei; Gustavo Alarcón-Nieto; James A Klarevas-Irby; Shouwen Ma; Lucy M Aplin; Bart Kempenaers
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 14.919

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.