Literature DB >> 31883091

Evaluation of MERS-CoV Neutralizing Antibodies in Sera Using Live Virus Microneutralization Assay.

Abdullah Algaissi1,2, Anwar M Hashem3,4.   

Abstract

The microneutralization (MN) assay is a standard and important technique in virology, immunology, and epidemiology. It is a highly specific and sensitive assay for evaluating virus-specific neutralizing antibodies (nAbs) in human and animal sera. It provides the most precise answer to whether or not an individual or animal has antibodies that can neutralize or inhibit the infectivity of a specific virus strain. However, using live virus-based MN assay might require working under high containment facilities especially when dealing with high-risk pathogens such as the Middle East respiratory syndrome-coronavirus (MERS-CoV). In this chapter, we describe the isolation, amplification, and titration of MERS-CoV, as well as detailed MN assay to measure nAb levels in sera from different mammalian species.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MERS-CoV; Microneutralization; Neutralizing antibodies

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31883091      PMCID: PMC7121888          DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-0211-9_9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Mol Biol        ISSN: 1064-3745


Introduction

The Middle East respiratory syndrome-coronavirus (MERS-CoV) is a novel zoonotic β-coronavirus that was first identified in Saudi Arabia in 2012 [1]. Epidemiological evidence suggests that dromedary camels are the main zoonotic source of MERS-CoV [2, 3]. MERS-CoV causes a wide range of manifestations ranging from asymptomatic infections to mild or severe respiratory disease. Detection of anti-MERS-CoV antibodies (Abs) in humans and/or animals represents a valuable tool in diagnostics as well as epidemiological, virological, and immunological studies including evaluation of vaccine immunogenicity [4-8]. Several serological assays have been developed and used for MERS-CoV, including ELISA-based assays, immunofluorescence assays, protein microarrays, and pseudovirus-based neutralization assays [9-17]. However, most of these assays pose several drawbacks and limitations such as low specificity and sensitivity, need for expensive and special equipment and reagents, and/or highly trained technical staff, which could limit their use. On the other hand, live virus-based microneutralization (MN) assay is a highly sensitive and specific technique used for the quantitation of virus-specific neutralizing antibodies (nAbs) to a given virus in mammalian sera as well as the evaluation of antiviral activities of small molecules and biologics. The assay has several advantages in detecting nAbs against MERS-CoV. It can precisely detect virus-specific nAbs in human and animal sera without the need for specific reagents or equipment, it can be carried out readily once the virus is isolated, and it can overcome strain-specific antigenic changes. The protocol presented in this chapter consists of four major steps, including MERS-CoV isolation, amplification, titration, and neutralization. The MN assay described here is suitable to quantitatively measure the titer of nAbs in sera from different mammalian species.

Materials

General Materials

Vero E6 cells. 37 °C water bath. Biosafety cabinet. 37 °C incubator with 5% CO2. Low-speed centrifuge. Inverted microscope. Cell counter or hemocytometer. M-10 media: Dulbecco’s modification of Eagle medium (DMEM), 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS), 1% l-glutamine, and 1% penicillin/streptomycin. M-2: Dulbecco’s modification of Eagle medium (DMEM), 2% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS), 1% l-glutamine, and 1% penicillin/streptomycin. 70% Ethanol for decontamination of laminar flow biosafety cabinet and objects brought into the hood. Sterile serological pipettes. Sterile DPBS without calcium or magnesium. Sterile 1× trypsin-EDTA in DPBS without calcium or magnesium. Sterile T25, T75, and T175 tissue culture flasks with vented caps. Sterile 15 mL falcon tubes. Sterile 1.5 mL tubes. 1 mL pipette. Multichannel pipette. Sterile disposable aerosol-resistant filtered tips. Sterile 0.22 μm, γ-irradiated syringe filters.

MERS-CoV Isolation, Amplification, Titration, and Microneutralization

MERS-CoV is a biosafety level 3 (BSL3) pathogen. Thus, all work involving infectious MERS-CoV should be handled in a BSL3 facility following the institutional guidelines and regulations such as wearing the proper PPE and having the proper training to work at a BSL3 facility. Confluent Vero E6 cells cultured in M-10 in a T75 tissue culture flask. Sterile 96-well tissue culture plates. Sterile U-shaped 96-well plates. MERS-CoV-positive sample: filtered using Sterile 0.22 μm, γ-irradiated syringe filters (to be used for virus isolation). Isolated MERS-CoV (to be titrated or amplified). Titrated MERS-CoV (for microneutralization assay). Test serum samples.

Methods

Continuous Culture of Vero E6 Cells

Proper aseptic techniques should be used, and all equipment and solutions to be used with cells must be sterile. All cell culture incubations should be performed in a humidified 37 °C incubator with 5% CO2, and all solutions should be pre-warmed to room temperature or 37 °C before use with cells. Remove a cryovial of frozen Vero E6 cells from liquid nitrogen storage and quickly thaw the cells for <1 min by gently swirling in a 37 °C water bath until there is just a small bit of ice left in the vial (see Note 1). Transfer the vial into a laminar flow biosafety cabinet and quickly disinfect the outside of the vial with 70% ethanol. Open the vial and transfer all the volume to a sterile 15 mL falcon tube containing 10 mL of pre-warmed M-10 (see Note 2). Centrifuge the cell suspension at approximately 200–500 × g for 5 min at room temperature. Aseptically decant the supernatant without disturbing the cell pellet (see Note 3). Gently re-suspend the cells in 10 mL of pre-warmed M-10 (see Note 4). Transfer the cell suspension to T75 tissue culture flask using sterile 10 mL serological pipette. Incubate the flask in 37 °C incubator with 5% CO2. Monitor cells under an inverted microscope daily or every other day and change media every 3–4 days if necessary (see Note 5). When cells reach >90–95% confluency, passage cells into new tissue culture flasks at 1:5 to 1:10 split ratio (see Notes 6 and 7). Maintain cells in continuous culture and passage them as needed for at least 2–3 passages after removal from long-term storage and before use.

Isolation and Amplification of MERS-CoV

Harvest confluent Vero E6 cells from a T75 tissue culture flask using standard trypsinization procedure (see Note 7). Count cells using cell counter or hemocytometer and prepare a cell suspension of 5 × 105 cells/mL in pre-warmed M-10. Seed 5 mL (~2.5 × 106 cells) or 20 mL (~1 × 107 cells) of the cell suspension into a T25 or T175 tissue culture flask, respectively, so that they are 90–95% confluent the next day (see Note 8). Incubate the flasks in 37 °C incubator with 5% CO2 for overnight. Next day, change the media by removing old media and add 2 mL or 5 mL of fresh pre-warmed M-2 into a T25 or T175 tissue culture flask, respectively. If using positive MERS-CoV sample, filter sterilize samples using Sterile 0.22 μm γ-irradiated syringe filters before inoculation onto Vero E6 cells (see Note 9). Add 0.5–1 mL of isolated MERS-CoV or filtered positive sample to the cells (see Note 10). Distribute the virus evenly over the cells and incubate for 1 h in 37 °C incubator with 5% CO2. Make up the final volume of media to 5 mL or 20 mL in T25 or T175 tissue culture flasks, respectively. Incubate the flask in 37 °C incubator with 5% CO2 for 2–3 days or until significant cytopathic effect (CPE) is observed (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1

Example of cytopathic effect (CPE) observed in Vero E6 cells infected with MERS-CoV 3 days after inoculation

Check the flask daily post-infection (see Note 11). When CPE is >50%, collect supernatant from the flask and centrifuge at 500 × g for 5 min to remove cellular debris (Fig. 1). Aliquot collected clarified supernatant in 100 μL or 1 mL aliquots in sterile 1.5 mL tubes and store at −80 °C (see Note 12). Example of cytopathic effect (CPE) observed in Vero E6 cells infected with MERS-CoV 3 days after inoculation

Titration of MERS-CoV by Tissue Culture Infective Dose 50 (TCID50)

Harvest confluent Vero E6 cells from the T75 tissue culture flask using standard trypsinization procedure (see Note 7). Count the cells using cell counter or hemocytometer and prepare a cell suspension of 1 × 105 cells/mL in pre-warmed M-10. Re-suspend 1 × 106 cells in 10 mL per 96-well plate. Seed 1 × 104 Vero E6 cells (100 μL) per well into sterile 96-well tissue culture plate so that they are 90–95% confluent the next day (see Note 8). Incubate the plate in 37 °C incubator with 5% CO2 for overnight. Next day, in a new sterile U-shaped 96-well plate, add 135 μL pre-warmed M-2 to all wells (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2

Schematic representation of preparation of virus dilution for MERS-CoV titration by TCID50. The sequential steps of plate preparation are indicated by numbered boxes. After completion, transfer 100 μL from the 96-well U-bottom plate containing diluted MERS-CoV sample to the cells in each corresponding well in the 96-well tissue culture plate using a multichannel pipette. CC is cell control wells

Add 15 μL of MERS-CoV per well in all wells of column 1 to have 1:10 dilution (Fig. 2). Perform tenfold serial (log10) dilution by transferring 15 μL progressively from column to column (Fig. 2) using a multichannel pipette (see Note 13). During each dilution step, mix well by pipetting eight times up and down (see Note 14). Discard the final 15 μL after column 11 (i.e., wells in column 12 should not contain virus, cell control (CC)). Remove the 96-well tissue culture plate containing confluent Vero E6 cells and aspirate the media (see Note 15). Transfer 100 μL from the U-shaped 96-well plate containing diluted MERS-CoV sample to the cells in each corresponding well in the 96-well tissue culture plate using a multichannel pipette (see Note 14). Incubate the 96-well tissue culture plate in 37 °C incubator with 5% CO2 for 3 days (see Note 11). After incubation, observe plate under an inverted microscope and score wells as positive for MERS-CoV (i.e., CPE) or negative for MERS-CoV (i.e., cells are intact and no CPE) (see Note 16). Calculate TCID50 using Reed–Muench formula [18]. Schematic representation of preparation of virus dilution for MERS-CoV titration by TCID50. The sequential steps of plate preparation are indicated by numbered boxes. After completion, transfer 100 μL from the 96-well U-bottom plate containing diluted MERS-CoV sample to the cells in each corresponding well in the 96-well tissue culture plate using a multichannel pipette. CC is cell control wells

MERS-CoV Microneutralization Assay

Harvest confluent Vero E6 cells from the T75 tissue culture flask using standard trypsinization procedure (see Note 7). Count the cells using cell counter or hemocytometer and prepare a cell suspension of 1 × 105 cells/mL in pre-warmed M-10. Re-suspend 1 × 106 cells in 10 mL per 96-well plate. Seed 1 × 104 Vero E6 cells (100 μL) per well into sterile 96-well tissue culture plate so that they are 90–95% confluent the next day (see Note 8). Incubate the plate in 37 °C incubator with 5% CO2 overnight. Next day, heat-inactivate test sera to be used for virus microneutralization by incubation for 30 min at 56 °C. In a new sterile U-shaped 96-well plate, add 60 μL pre-warmed M-2 to all wells (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3

Plate preparation for MERS-CoV microneutralization assay. The preparation steps for MERS-CoV microneutralization assay plate are indicated by numbered boxes. After completion, incubate the serum-virus mixtures for 1 h in 37 °C incubator with 5% CO2. Then, transfer 100 μL from the U-shaped 96-well plate containing diluted MERS-CoV sample to the cells in each corresponding well in the 96-well tissue culture plate using a multichannel pipette. VC is virus control and CC is cell control wells

Add an additional 48 μL pre-warmed M-2 to wells A1–A10 in row A (Fig. 3). Add 12 μL heat-inactivated serum per well in wells A1–A10 in row A to have 1:10 dilution (Fig. 3). Do not add serum to A11 and A12 (see Note 17). Perform twofold serial dilutions on added serum samples by transferring 60 μL progressively from row to row (i.e., A1 to B1; B1 to C1; etc. up to G1 to H1) using a multichannel pipette (Fig. 3). During each dilution step mix well by pipetting eight times up and down (see Note 14). Discard the final 60 μL after row H. Prepare virus suspension in pre-warmed M-2 so that 60 μL contains 120 TCID50 (i.e., 2 × 103 TCID50/mL). Approximately 6 mL/plate is needed (see Note 18). Add 60 μL diluted virus to all wells except wells in columns 12 (CC wells). Add 60 μL pre-warmed M-2 to all CC wells (i.e., columns 12). Incubate the serum-virus mixtures for 1 h in 37 °C incubator with 5% CO2. Remove the 96-well tissue culture plate containing confluent Vero E6 cells and aspirate the media (see Note 15). Transfer 100 μL from the U-shaped 96-well plate to the cells in each corresponding well in the 96-well tissue culture plate using a multichannel pipette (see Note 14). Incubate the 96-well tissue culture plate in 37 °C incubator with 5% CO2 for 3 days (see Note 11). Calculate MN50 or MN100 titers of each serum sample as the highest serum dilution that completely protect the cells from CPE in half or all wells, respectively. Plate preparation for MERS-CoV microneutralization assay. The preparation steps for MERS-CoV microneutralization assay plate are indicated by numbered boxes. After completion, incubate the serum-virus mixtures for 1 h in 37 °C incubator with 5% CO2. Then, transfer 100 μL from the U-shaped 96-well plate containing diluted MERS-CoV sample to the cells in each corresponding well in the 96-well tissue culture plate using a multichannel pipette. VC is virus control and CC is cell control wells

Notes

The water bath is a potential source of contamination. To reduce the risk of contamination, keep the O-ring and cap of the cryovial out of the water. Frozen cell stocks contain dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), which is harmful to the cells, and it should be diluted and removed after thawing the cells and before transferring the cells to tissue culture flasks. After centrifugation, check the clarity of the supernatant and visibility of a complete pellet. Different volumes and culture vessels could be used. It is better to initiate Vero E6 cells culture in a T25 tissue culture flask. If using a T25 tissue culture flask, re-suspend the cells in 5 mL media, and if using T75 tissue culture flask, re-suspend the cells in 10 mL media. Vero E6 cells recover slowly after freezing and may take more than a week before they are ready to be passaged. It may take 2–3 passages before the Vero E6 cells reach their normal growth rate. It is important to monitor Vero E6 cells and to subculture them once confluent. Depending on the number of seeded cells and the size of the used flask, Vero E6 cells usually need to be passaged 2–3 times per week. To harvest or maintain Vero E6 cells, remove media from the flask, wash the cell monolayer gently with 3–5 mL of sterile pre-warmed DPBS without calcium or magnesium, and discard the used washing solution. Add 2–5 mL pre-warmed 1× trypsin-EDTA in DPBS without calcium or magnesium to the cell monolayer and incubate for 5–10 min at 37 °C, 5% CO2 to detach cells (incubation may vary, so check the cells every 2–3 min). After cells are detached, add 5 mL pre-warmed M-10 to the flask to inactivate trypsin activity, and collect detached cells in 15 mL sterile falcon tube. Make sure to centrifuge the collected cells and discard the supernatant. Then, add new 1–2 mL pre-warmed M-10 and re-suspend the cells by pipetting up and down using 1 mL pipette to make a homogenous cell suspension. Change the seeding density of cells when cells are under or over confluent. Use, Sterile 0.22 μm, γ-irradiated syringe filters with small membrane diameter if sample volume is small for minimal sample loss. Multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 0.001–0.1 could be used if titer is known. It is suggested to use small culture vessels (T25 tissue culture flask) for virus isolation from positive samples and larger culture vessels (T175 tissue culture flask) for virus amplification. CPE could be strain specific, and it depends on the strain and starting titer of the seed virus. Each tube should be used once only to avoid freezing and thawing as this can significantly decrease the virus titer. Use 1 mL aliquots tubes for virus amplification. Other dilutions such as ½ log10 dilution could be used. Change pipette tips between wells. Avoid cell drying by minimizing the time between media aspiration and adding the virus inoculum or the serum-virus mixtures. Alternatively, remove media from cells and fix cells with 100 μL ice-cold 4% paraformaldehyde for 5 min at room temperature. Remove fixative and stain cells with 100 μL crystal violet (0.05% w/v) in 20% methanol for 30 min at room temperature, and wash cells in tap water. Score wells as positive for MERS-CoV (i.e., no crystal violet) or negative for MERS-CoV (i.e., cells are stained with crystal violet). For each serum sample, 12 μL are needed per single test; however, sera should be tested in at least duplicates, so more volume is needed. Different plates should be used when testing neutralization against different virus strains. Set up back virus titration to ensure working virus concentration is accurate. Starting with the working virus dilution (2 × 103 TCID50/mL), prepare twofold serial dilution in pre-warmed M-2 in a final volume of 60 μL (4 replicates per dilution). After dilution, add 60 μL of pre-warmed M-2 to each well for a final volume of 120 μL and incubate for 1 h in 37 °C incubator with 5% CO2. Then, transfer 100 μL to Vero E6 cells in 96-well tissue culture plate and incubate for 3 days in 37 °C incubator with 5% CO2. After incubation, examine the plate for CPE and calculate TCID50 using Reed–Muench formula.
  17 in total

1.  Recovery from the Middle East respiratory syndrome is associated with antibody and T-cell responses.

Authors:  Jingxian Zhao; Abeer N Alshukairi; Salim A Baharoon; Waleed A Ahmed; Ahmad A Bokhari; Atef M Nehdi; Laila A Layqah; Mohammed G Alghamdi; Manal M Al Gethamy; Ashraf M Dada; Imran Khalid; Mohamad Boujelal; Sameera M Al Johani; Leatrice Vogel; Kanta Subbarao; Ashutosh Mangalam; Chaorong Wu; Patrick Ten Eyck; Stanley Perlman; Jincun Zhao
Journal:  Sci Immunol       Date:  2017-08-04

2.  Seroepidemiology of Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) coronavirus in Saudi Arabia (1993) and Australia (2014) and characterisation of assay specificity.

Authors:  M G Hemida; R A Perera; R A Al Jassim; G Kayali; L Y Siu; P Wang; K W Chu; S Perlman; M A Ali; A Alnaeem; Y Guan; L L Poon; L Saif; M Peiris
Journal:  Euro Surveill       Date:  2014-06-12

3.  Isolation of a novel coronavirus from a man with pneumonia in Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Ali M Zaki; Sander van Boheemen; Theo M Bestebroer; Albert D M E Osterhaus; Ron A M Fouchier
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Comparison of serological assays in human Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS)-coronavirus infection.

Authors:  Sang Won Park; Ranawaka A P M Perera; Pyoeng Gyun Choe; Eric H Y Lau; Seong Jin Choi; June Young Chun; Hong Sang Oh; Kyoung-Ho Song; Ji Hwan Bang; Eu Suk Kim; Hong Bin Kim; Wan Beom Park; Nam Joong Kim; Leo Lit Man Poon; Malik Peiris; Myoung Don Oh
Journal:  Euro Surveill       Date:  2015

5.  Inability of rat DPP4 to allow MERS-CoV infection revealed by using a VSV pseudotype bearing truncated MERS-CoV spike protein.

Authors:  Aiko Fukuma; Hideki Tani; Satoshi Taniguchi; Masayuki Shimojima; Masayuki Saijo; Shuetsu Fukushi
Journal:  Arch Virol       Date:  2015-07-04       Impact factor: 2.574

6.  Presence of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus antibodies in Saudi Arabia: a nationwide, cross-sectional, serological study.

Authors:  Marcel A Müller; Benjamin Meyer; Victor M Corman; Malak Al-Masri; Abdulhafeez Turkestani; Daniel Ritz; Andrea Sieberg; Souhaib Aldabbagh; Berend-J Bosch; Erik Lattwein; Raafat F Alhakeem; Abdullah M Assiri; Ali M Albarrak; Ali M Al-Shangiti; Jaffar A Al-Tawfiq; Paul Wikramaratna; Abdullah A Alrabeeah; Christian Drosten; Ziad A Memish
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 25.071

7.  Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus infection in dromedary camels in Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Abdulaziz N Alagaili; Thomas Briese; Nischay Mishra; Vishal Kapoor; Stephen C Sameroff; Peter D Burbelo; Emmie de Wit; Vincent J Munster; Lisa E Hensley; Iyad S Zalmout; Amit Kapoor; Jonathan H Epstein; William B Karesh; Peter Daszak; Osama B Mohammed; W Ian Lipkin
Journal:  mBio       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 7.867

8.  Hospital-associated outbreak of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus: a serologic, epidemiologic, and clinical description.

Authors:  Mohammad Mousa Al-Abdallat; Daniel C Payne; Sultan Alqasrawi; Brian Rha; Rania A Tohme; Glen R Abedi; Mohannad Al Nsour; Ibrahim Iblan; Najwa Jarour; Noha H Farag; Aktham Haddadin; Tarek Al-Sanouri; Azaibi Tamin; Jennifer L Harcourt; David T Kuhar; David L Swerdlow; Dean D Erdman; Mark A Pallansch; Lia M Haynes; Susan I Gerber
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 9.079

9.  Characterization of novel monoclonal antibodies against the MERS-coronavirus spike protein and their application in species-independent antibody detection by competitive ELISA.

Authors:  Shuetsu Fukushi; Aiko Fukuma; Takeshi Kurosu; Shumpei Watanabe; Masayuki Shimojima; Kazuya Shirato; Naoko Iwata-Yoshikawa; Noriyo Nagata; Kazuo Ohnishi; Manabu Ato; Simenew Keskes Melaku; Hiroshi Sentsui; Masayuki Saijo
Journal:  J Virol Methods       Date:  2017-10-06       Impact factor: 2.014

10.  Viral Shedding and Antibody Response in 37 Patients With Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Infection.

Authors:  Victor M Corman; Ali M Albarrak; Ali Senosi Omrani; Mohammed M Albarrak; Mohamed Elamin Farah; Malak Almasri; Doreen Muth; Andrea Sieberg; Benjamin Meyer; Abdullah M Assiri; Tabea Binger; Katja Steinhagen; Erik Lattwein; Jaffar Al-Tawfiq; Marcel A Müller; Christian Drosten; Ziad A Memish
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 9.079

View more
  18 in total

1.  Immunogenicity, Effectiveness, and Safety of Inactivated Virus (CoronaVac) Vaccine in a Two-Dose Primary Protocol and BNT162b2 Heterologous Booster in Brazil (Immunita-001): A One Year Period Follow Up Phase 4 Study.

Authors:  Rafaella F Q Grenfell; Nathalie B F Almeida; Priscilla S Filgueiras; Camila A Corsini; Sarah V C Gomes; Daniel A P de Miranda; Adelina J Lourenço; Olindo A Martins-Filho; Jaquelline G de Oliveira; Andrea Teixeira-Carvalho; Guilherme R F Campos; Mauricio L Nogueira; Pedro Augusto Alves; Gabriel R Fernandes; Leda R Castilho; Tulio M Lima; Daniel P B de Abreu; Renata G F Alvim; Thaís Bárbara de S Silva; Wander de J Jeremias; Dayane A Otta; Ana Carolina Campi-Azevedo
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 8.786

2.  Dynamics of antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 in convalescent plasma donors.

Authors:  Maurice Steenhuis; Gerard van Mierlo; Ninotska Il Derksen; Pleuni Ooijevaar-de Heer; Simone Kruithof; Floris L Loeff; Lea C Berkhout; Federica Linty; Chantal Reusken; Johan Reimerink; Boris Hogema; Hans Zaaijer; Leo van de Watering; Francis Swaneveld; Marit J van Gils; Berend Jan Bosch; S Marieke van Ham; Anja Ten Brinke; Gestur Vidarsson; Ellen C van der Schoot; Theo Rispens
Journal:  Clin Transl Immunology       Date:  2021-05-16

Review 3.  Drug targets for COVID-19 therapeutics: Ongoing global efforts.

Authors:  Ambrish Saxena
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 1.826

4.  Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 IgG Antibodies in Corsica (France), April and June 2020.

Authors:  Lisandru Capai; Nazli Ayhan; Shirley Masse; Jean Canarelli; Stéphane Priet; Marie-Hélène Simeoni; Remi Charrel; Xavier de Lamballerie; Alessandra Falchi
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 4.241

5.  Recombinant SARS-CoV-2 RBD with a built in T helper epitope induces strong neutralization antibody response.

Authors:  Qiu-Dong Su; Ye-Ning Zou; Yao Yi; Li-Ping Shen; Xiang-Zhong Ye; Yang Zhang; Hui Wang; Hong Ke; Jing-Dong Song; Ke-Ping Hu; Bo-Lin Cheng; Feng Qiu; Peng-Cheng Yu; Wen-Ting Zhou; Ran Zhao; Lei Cao; Gao-Feng Dong; Sheng-Li Bi; Gui-Zhen Wu; George Fu Gao; Jerry Zheng
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 3.641

6.  Ad26.COV2.S protects Syrian hamsters against G614 spike variant SARS-CoV-2 and does not enhance respiratory disease.

Authors:  Joan E M van der Lubbe; Sietske K Rosendahl Huber; Aneesh Vijayan; Liesbeth Dekking; Ella van Huizen; Jessica Vreugdenhil; Ying Choi; Miranda R M Baert; Karin Feddes-de Boer; Ana Izquierdo Gil; Marjolein van Heerden; Tim J Dalebout; Sebenzile K Myeni; Marjolein Kikkert; Eric J Snijder; Leon de Waal; Koert J Stittelaar; Jeroen T B M Tolboom; Jan Serroyen; Leacky Muchene; Leslie van der Fits; Lucy Rutten; Johannes P M Langedijk; Dan H Barouch; Hanneke Schuitemaker; Roland C Zahn; Frank Wegmann
Journal:  NPJ Vaccines       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 7.344

7.  Investigation of SARS-CoV-2 infection in dogs and cats of humans diagnosed with COVID-19 in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Authors:  Guilherme Amaral Calvet; Sandro Antonio Pereira; Maria Ogrzewalska; Alex Pauvolid-Corrêa; Paola Cristina Resende; Wagner de Souza Tassinari; Anielle de Pina Costa; Lucas Oliveira Keidel; Alice Sampaio Barreto da Rocha; Michele Fernanda Borges da Silva; Shanna Araujo Dos Santos; Ana Beatriz Machado Lima; Isabella Campos Vargas de Moraes; Artur Augusto Velho Mendes Junior; Thiago das Chagas Souza; Ezequias Batista Martins; Renato Orsini Ornellas; Maria Lopes Corrêa; Isabela Maria da Silva Antonio; Lusiele Guaraldo; Fernando do Couto Motta; Patrícia Brasil; Marilda Mendonça Siqueira; Isabella Dib Ferreira Gremião; Rodrigo Caldas Menezes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Neutralizing antibodies for SARS-CoV-2 in stray animals from Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Authors:  Helver Gonçalves Dias; Maria Eduarda Barreto Resck; Gabriela Cardoso Caldas; Alessandro Fioretti Resck; Natália Valente da Silva; Aline Marcele Vieira Dos Santos; Thiago das Chagas Sousa; Maria Halina Ogrzewalska; Marilda Mendonça Siqueira; Alex Pauvolid-Corrêa; Flavia Barreto Dos Santos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies using a CPE-based colorimetric live virus micro-neutralization assay in human serum samples.

Authors:  Alessandro Manenti; Marta Maggetti; Elisa Casa; Donata Martinuzzi; Alessandro Torelli; Claudia M Trombetta; Serena Marchi; Emanuele Montomoli
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  2020-05-17       Impact factor: 20.693

Review 10.  Point-of-Care Diagnostics of COVID-19: From Current Work to Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Heba A Hussein; Rabeay Y A Hassan; Marco Chino; Ferdinando Febbraio
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 3.576

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.