Literature DB >> 31883073

A blessing for the Yangtze River: optimization of Chinese regional policy planning for water yield and purification in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area.

Qinli Xiong1, Yang Xiao2, Marwa Waseem A Halmy3, Kaiwen Pan1, Mohammed A Dakhil1,4,5, Lin Zhang1, Ting Li1, Pinghan Liang6.   

Abstract

Land use/land cover (LULC) changes impact the structure and functioning of ecosystems, which consequently influences the provisioning of a range of ecosystem services (ES). There is a growing consensus regarding the merit of integrating the evaluation of ES into regional policy planning. The Yangtze River is the world's third longest and supports more than 6% of its population. However, assessing the potential impacts of different resource management policies upon ES is complicated in the Yangtze basin. To remedy this, here we designed a scenario analysis-based approach that used remotely sensed data and GIS (geographic information system) to analyze the relationships between ES (i.e., water flow regulation, water purification) and policies envisioned to improve human welfare in the Chongqing municipality, in the upper reaches of the Three Gorges Reservoir Area (TGRA) in the Yangtze basin. This watershed area has high population density and suffers from severe flood hazard and critical pollution issues. The GEOMOD modeling technique was used to predict LULC changes according to policy planning alternatives, producing scenarios by 2050 for the TGRA watershed. The GIS-based ES model (InVEST model) was developed as a tool to inform the decision-making process with the intention of aligning conservation measures with economic development. We examine policy effectiveness by comparing three scenarios for 2050: scenario-1 maintains the current policy, with no considerations of ES; scenario-2 integrates ES into policy planning; and scenario-3 integrates ES into policy planning considering the needs of local people. Our scenario-based LULC change analysis showed that the land with large increases in water flow regulation (i.e., values ≤-3000 × 103 m3 km-2) were scattered over the entire study area, while phosphorus reduction (i.e., values ≤ -30 kg km-2) were located mainly along rivers in all scenarios. Scenario-2 and scenario-3 are based on policies aiming at enhancing ES provisioning; for these, the projected ecological risks of water pollution are significantly reduced (39.97% and 37.58%, respectively). Total net changes of the investigated ES under scenario-2 or scenario-3 were almost double that occurring under scenario-1. Although scenario-2 and scenario-3 showed a near-equal total net change, water purification under scenario-2 was the greatest relative to forest expansion. However, scenario-3 offered the best future environmental development scenario, as it accounted for the demand and supply characteristics of water yield and purification in different regions. The water purification service made the greatest contribution to positive and negative effects (26%-47% and -7%, respectively) on ES provisioning. Linking water purification service to policy planning would effectively improve the overall ES. These scenario forecasting results will help the Three Gorges Dam to gain more ecological benefits via improvements to water flow regulation and the effective alleviation of degraded water quality in heavily populated regions in the Yangtze basin.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ecological policy; Ecosystem service models; Human welfare; Scenario analysis; Water purification

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31883073     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-019-07178-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  14 in total

1.  Conserving biodiversity and ecosystem services.

Authors:  P Balvanera; G C Daily; P R Ehrlich; T H Ricketts; S A Bailey; C Kark; H Pereira
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-03-16       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Mapping socio-economic scenarios of land cover change: a GIS method to enable ecosystem service modelling.

Authors:  R D Swetnam; B Fisher; B P Mbilinyi; P K T Munishi; S Willcock; T Ricketts; S Mwakalila; A Balmford; N D Burgess; A R Marshall; S L Lewis
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 6.789

3.  Modeling the water-satisfied degree for production of the main food crops in China.

Authors:  Guangming Yu; Yumeng Yang; Zhenfa Tu; Yi Jie; Qiwu Yu; Xiaoyan Hu; Hailong Yu; Ruirui Zhou; Xiaoxu Chen; Hongzhi Wang
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 7.963

Review 4.  Mapping and valuing ecosystem services as an approach for conservation and natural-resource management.

Authors:  Heather Tallis; Stephen Polasky
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 5.691

5.  Meeting China's water shortage crisis: current practices and challenges.

Authors:  Hefa Cheng; Yuanan Hu; Jianfu Zhao
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 6.  Ecological and socioeconomic effects of China's policies for ecosystem services.

Authors:  Jianguo Liu; Shuxin Li; Zhiyun Ouyang; Christine Tam; Xiaodong Chen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-07-09       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Assessing changes in water flow regulation in Chongqing region, China.

Authors:  Yang Xiao; Qiang Xiao; Zhiyun Ouyang; Qin Maomao
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2015-05-17       Impact factor: 2.513

8.  Simulation of spatial and temporal distributions of non-point source pollution load in the Three Gorges Reservoir Region.

Authors:  Zhenyao Shen; Jiali Qiu; Qian Hong; Lei Chen
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2014-06-16       Impact factor: 7.963

9.  Challenges arising from China's two-child policy.

Authors:  Wenjie Gong; Dong Roman Xu; Eric D Caine
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2016-03-26       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Identifying key areas of ecosystem services potential to improve ecological management in Chongqing City, southwest China.

Authors:  Yang Xiao; Qiang Xiao
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 2.513

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.