Literature DB >> 31883056

A Multicenter, Retrospective Study (RE-ENACT 2) on the Use of Razumab™ (World's First Biosimilar Ranibizumab) in Wet Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

Shashikant Sharma1, Mujtaba Khan2, Alok Chaturvedi2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The REal life assessmENt of safety And effeCTiveness of Razumab (RE-ENACT) and long-term RE-ENACT 2 retrospective studies have evaluated the use of Razumab™ (world's first biosimilar ranibizumab) in retinal disorders in Indian patients. This report presents the subgroup analysis from the RE-ENACT 2 study in patients with wet age-related macular degeneration (wet AMD).
METHODS: Medical charts of patients administered biosimilar ranibizumab injections as PRN treatment regimen between September 2015 and June 2018, at 17 centers across India, were reviewed. Changes from baseline in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA, based on Snellen's or logMAR chart), central subfield thickness (CSFT), intraocular pressure (IOP), and proportions of patients having intraretinal fluid (IRF) and subretinal fluid (SRF) at weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 30, 36, and 48 were evaluated.
RESULTS: Of 103 patients with wet AMD, 62.1% were men and the majority (74.8%) were treatment naïve. The majority (57.9%) of the patients had received 3 (range 1-5) injections. Significant improvements were observed from baseline to all timepoints for BCVA (baseline, 0.92 ± 0.6 [n = 94]; week 48, 0.51 ± 0.4 [n = 14]; P = 0.0014) and CSFT (baseline, 430.83 ± 14.4 [n = 85]; week 48, 301.26 ± 11.6 [n = 15]; P < 0.0001). Changes in IOP from baseline to 48 weeks were minimal and not significant (14.92 ± 3.2 [n = 94] vs. 14.50 ± 2.1 [n = 18]; P = 0.9068). A decrease in proportions of patients having IRF (baseline, 63.6% [n = 99] vs. week 48, 15% [n = 20]) and SRF (baseline, 82.3% [n = 96] vs. week 48, 5% [n = 20]) were also observed. Similar results were observed for occult and classic subgroups. There were no new safety concerns.
CONCLUSION: Razumab (biosimilar ranibizumab) demonstrated improvements in visual acuity and disease outcomes in patients with wet age-related macular degeneration without new safety issues.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Age-related macular degeneration; Anti-VEGF; Biosimilar ranibizumab; Wet AMD

Year:  2019        PMID: 31883056      PMCID: PMC7054591          DOI: 10.1007/s40123-019-00228-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmol Ther


Key Summary Points

Introduction

The third most common cause of blindness (after cataract and glaucoma), age-related macular degeneration (AMD, 8.7% of all blindness), affects the macular region of elderly patients (over 60 years old) [1, 2]. Wet AMD is characterized by neovascularization spreading to the subretinal pigment epithelium or subretinal space, and increased presence of intraretinal fluid (IRF) or subretinal fluid (SRF) [3-6]. AMD is classified as “wet” and “dry” types [2]. Dry AMD precedes wet AMD (also known as neovascular AMD) through choroidal neovascularization (CNV), in which abnormal blood vessels from the choroid develop in or under the retina [7]. CNV and related exudation, bleeding, and disciform scarring are responsible for more than 80% of vision loss in AMD. Wet AMD can be further categorized into classic, occult, or mixed types [8]. Of all patients with AMD, 10–15% cases are wet AMD, which accounts for approximately 90% of blindness due to this disease [9]. In developing countries like India, a rapid increase in ageing population may be an indicator of emerging public health problems associated with old age such as AMD (prevalence 3.1–10.6%) [10]. Population-based surveys have revealed that AMD accounts for 1.7–3.3% of all blindness diagnosed in India [11]. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is an important cytokine in the pathogenesis of CNV. Anti-VEGF agents have shown favorable treatment outcomes, as compared with the previous treatment options like thermal laser photocoagulation and photodynamic therapy (PDT) with intravenous verteporfin, and have become the standard treatment for wet AMD [1, 12–14]. Ranibizumab is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicine Agency (EMEA) for the treatment of wet AMD. The efficacy and safety of ranibizumab in the treatment of several retinal disorders including wet AMD have been established in earlier prospective, randomized, double-masked clinical trials. The US FDA approval of ranibizumab for the treatment of visual impairment due to wet AMD was based on the results from the two pivotal phase 3 MARINA [15] and ANCHOR [16] studies. The world’s first biosimilar ranibizumab Razumab™ was developed by Intas Pharmaceuticals Ltd. to provide a cost-effective alternative which is accessible to patients with retinal disorders [17], and it was approved by the highest Indian regulatory body, the Drug Controller General of India, in 2015. A prospective study has demonstrated the efficacy and safety of biosimilar ranibizumab in Indian patients with chorioretinal vascular diseases including wet AMD [18]. A previous retrospective, multicenter, observational study, REal life assessmENt of safety And effeCTiveness of Razumab (RE-ENACT), established the use of biosimilar ranibizumab for the treatment of retinal disorders in a real-world clinical setting [19-21]. The RE-ENACT 2 study generated long-term data on the use of biosimilar ranibizumab. The current report presents the subgroup analysis of the RE-ENACT 2 study in Indian patients with wet AMD.

Methods

Data of patients with wet AMD of either sex, aged at least 18 years old, who received biosimilar ranibizumab injections (0.5 mg or 0.05 mL as PRN regimen) for the treatment of wet AMD between September 2015 and June 2018 at 17 centers across India were retrospectively analyzed. Wet AMD was defined and clinically diagnosed by the presence of choroidal neovascular membrane along with its sequelae, such as focal areas of retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) loss, subretinal or sub-RPE hemorrhage or serous fluid, and subretinal fibrosis. Both, treatment-naïve and patients previously treated with other anti-VEGF/steroids/laser treatment were included in this study. Patients in whom assessment of optical coherence tomography (OCT) results were not available (i.e., dense cataract) were excluded. Razumab (biosimilar ranibizumab) PRN treatment regimen was guided by disease activity criteria. Disease activity was defined as visual impairment attributable to increase in intraretinal or subretinal fluid, or active leakage from the CNV lesion as compared to the previous visit findings. Razumab treatment was discontinued if no disease activity was observed. The treatment was resumed if the disease activity criteria were fulfilled. Ethics committee approval was obtained to conduct this retrospective study (OM Ethics Committee, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India) and the study was performed in accordance with the ethical standards as laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The study endpoints included change from baseline to weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 30, 36, and 48 in the best corrected visual acuity (BCVA, measured by Snellen’s chart or the logMAR chart), central subfield thickness (CSFT, measured by spectral-domain OCT [SD-OCT]), and intraocular pressure (IOP). The decrease in the proportion of patients with IRF and SRF, measured by SD-OCT, from baseline to each timepoint was also evaluated. Two-tailed paired t test was used to analyze BCVA and CSFT, while χ2 test was used for IRF and SRF. All statistical analyses were done using SAS® 9.4.

Results

Patient Disposition and Demographics

A total of 103 patients with wet AMD were included in this subgroup analysis; 62.1% were men and the majority (74.8%) were treatment naïve. The majority of the patients had received 3 (range 1–5) biosimilar ranibizumab injections (73.8%) and the majority of the patients had hypertension (51.5%) and diabetes (22.3%). The most common wet AMD subtype was classic (n = 72, mean age 67.4 ± 8.4 years, men 62.5%) followed by occult (n = 13, mean age 63.6 ± 12.2 years, men 46.2%) and minimally classic (n = 8, mean age 65 ± 9.7 years, men 75%). The baseline BCVA values were available in 94 (classic 66, occult 13, minimally classic 4) patients and CSFT in 85 (classic 69, occult 13, minimally classic 3) patients, respectively. The treatment effects were observed up to 48 weeks. Table 1 represents the patient disposition and baseline characteristics.
Table 1

Patient disposition and baseline characteristics

ParametersBiosimilar ranibizumab (N = 103)
Age, years (mean ± SD)67.2 ± 9.02
Gender
  Men64 (62.1)
  Women39 (37.9)
Wet AMD subgroup, n (%)a
  Classic72 (69.9)
  Occult13 (12.6)
  Minimally classic8 (7.8)
Eye treated, n (%)
  Left50 (48.5)
  Right53 (51.5)
Phakic vs. pseudophakic eye, n (%)
  Phakic eye46 (44.7)
  Pseudophakic eye57 (55.3)
Treatment, n (%)a
  Treatment naïve77 (74.8)
  Previously treated18 (17.5)
Baseline BCVA score, logMAR, mean ± SDb0.92 ± 0.6
Baseline CSFT, µm, mean ± SDb430.83 ± 14.4
Baseline IOP, mmHg, mean ± SDb14.92 ± 3.2
Baseline SRFa
  Present, n (%)79 (82.3)
  Absent, n (%)17 (17.7)
Baseline IRFa
  Present, n (%)63 (63.6)
  Absent, n (%)36 (36.4)

AMD age-related macular degeneration, BCVA best corrected visual acuity, CSFT central subfield thickness, IRF intraretinal fluid, SD standard deviation, SRF subretinal fluid, VEGF vascular endothelial growth factor

aData not available for 10 patients in wet AMD subgroup, 8 patients for treatment-naïve vs. previously treated eye, 7 patients for baseline SRF, and 4 patients for baseline IRF

bBaseline scores for BCVA available in 94 patients, CSFT in 85 patients, and IOP in 94 patients

Patient disposition and baseline characteristics AMD age-related macular degeneration, BCVA best corrected visual acuity, CSFT central subfield thickness, IRF intraretinal fluid, SD standard deviation, SRF subretinal fluid, VEGF vascular endothelial growth factor aData not available for 10 patients in wet AMD subgroup, 8 patients for treatment-naïve vs. previously treated eye, 7 patients for baseline SRF, and 4 patients for baseline IRF bBaseline scores for BCVA available in 94 patients, CSFT in 85 patients, and IOP in 94 patients

Best Corrected Visual Acuity

The mean ± SE BCVA improved significantly (P < 0.05) from baseline to all timepoints (baseline, 0.92 ± 0.06; week 48, 0.51 ± 0.08) indicating improved visual acuity. A slight decrease in BCVA improvements were observed from weeks 20 to 30 compared to previous weeks, though these improvements were significant as compared with baseline; thereafter improvements were again observed till the last visit (Fig. 1). Figure 2 represents the mean change in BCVA from baseline at each timepoint. The majority (73.8%) of the patients had received three biosimilar ranibizumab injections with significant improvements (P < 0.05) seen in BCVA at all timepoints. A maximum of five injections were administered and the improvements were observed up to 48 weeks. The change in mean BCVA from baseline to all timepoints did not differ significantly when evaluated for treatment-naïve vs. previously treated patients (Online Resource 1), except at weeks 4 and 20, where the changes were significant in favor of treatment-naïve patients.
Fig. 1

Mean ± SE BCVA at baseline and at each timepoint after biosimilar ranibizumab administration. BCVA best corrected visual acuity

Fig. 2

Mean change in BCVA from baseline and at each timepoint after biosimilar ranibizumab administration. BCVA best corrected visual acuity

Mean ± SE BCVA at baseline and at each timepoint after biosimilar ranibizumab administration. BCVA best corrected visual acuity Mean change in BCVA from baseline and at each timepoint after biosimilar ranibizumab administration. BCVA best corrected visual acuity The improvements in the BCVA were significant (P < 0.05) from baseline to 48 weeks for classic (baseline, 0.98 ± 0.08; week 48, 0.50 ± 0.1) and occult (baseline, 0.69 ± 0.18; week 48, 0.54 ± 0.24) subgroups (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3

Mean BCVA at baseline and at each timepoint after biosimilar ranibizumab administration in classic and occult subgroups

Mean BCVA at baseline and at each timepoint after biosimilar ranibizumab administration in classic and occult subgroups

Central Subfield Thickness

A significant (P < 0.05) decrease in the CSFT scores indicating improved disease condition was observed from baseline (430.83 ± 14.4) to 48 weeks (301.26 ± 11.6) (Fig. 4). Figure 5 represents the mean change in CSFT from baseline at each timepoint. Improvements in CSFT were continuous till the 20th week (5th injection), after which a slight decrease in the improvement was observed compared to previous weeks. There were significant improvements (P < 0.05) in CSFT from baseline to all timepoints in patients who received three biosimilar ranibizumab injections. The change in mean CSFT from baseline to all timepoints did not differ significantly when evaluated for treatment-naïve vs. previously treated patients (Online Resource 2), except at weeks 8 to 20, where the changes were significant in favor of treatment-naïve patients.
Fig. 4

Mean ± SE CSFT (µm) at baseline and at each timepoint after biosimilar ranibizumab administration. CSFT central subfield thickness

Fig. 5

Mean change in CSFT (µm) from baseline at each timepoint after biosimilar ranibizumab administration. CSFT central subfield thickness

Mean ± SE CSFT (µm) at baseline and at each timepoint after biosimilar ranibizumab administration. CSFT central subfield thickness Mean change in CSFT (µm) from baseline at each timepoint after biosimilar ranibizumab administration. CSFT central subfield thickness The decrease in CSFT was significant (P < 0.05) from baseline to 48 weeks when analyzed for classic (449.67 ± 18.26 vs. 306.40 ± 12.46) and occult subgroups (375.08 ± 20.63 vs. 275.00 ± 42.45) (Fig. 6).
Fig. 6

Mean ± SE CSFT at baseline and at each timepoint after biosimilar ranibizumab administration in classic and occult subgroups. CSFT central subfield thickness

Mean ± SE CSFT at baseline and at each timepoint after biosimilar ranibizumab administration in classic and occult subgroups. CSFT central subfield thickness

Intraretinal Fluid and Subretinal Fluid

A significant (P < 0.05) reduction in the proportion of patients having IRF or SRF from baseline to all timepoints was observed, indicating improved disease condition. The proportions of patients having IRF at baseline and at weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 30, 36, and 48 were 63.6%, 46.3%, 39.5%, 33.8%, 19%, 12.5%, 15%, 3.8%, 9.5%, and 15%, respectively. Similarly, the proportions of patients having SRF at baseline and at weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 30, 36 and 48 were 82.3%, 69.2%, 44.7%, 28.8%, 6.9%, 10.4%, 12.5%, 11.5%, 4.8%, and 5%, respectively. The proportions of patients with IRF and SRF present or absent at each follow-up are presented in Online Resource 3.

Intraocular Pressure

The changes in mean IOP scores observed from baseline (14.92 ± 3.2 [n = 94]) to 48 weeks (14.50 ± 2.1 [n = 18]) were ± 1 mmHg at most of the timepoints, which were not significant. Similarly, the changes were not significant from baseline to all timepoints in patients who received three biosimilar ranibizumab injections. When evaluated for treatment-naïve vs. previously treated patients, changes in mean IOP from baseline to all timepoints did not differ significantly. The changes in IOP from baseline were minimal, and not significant, when analyzed for classic and occult subgroups.

Discussion

Wet AMD is a chronic, progressive disease of the central retina and a major cause of irreversible vision loss worldwide [22]. In wet AMD, overexpression of VEGF is known to be associated with neoangiogenesis, which is related to the pathogenesis of wet AMD [22, 23]. Ranibizumab, a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody fragment (Fab), can inhibit the growth of blood vessels by binding to all isoforms of VEGFA [23]. Improvements in visual acuity have been reported with ranibizumab to a greater extent than standard treatments such as laser and photodynamic therapy with verteporfin [24]. Ranibizumab was associated with significant improvements in visual acuity and was well tolerated in the treatment of wet AMD in two pivotal phase 3 MARINA [15] and ANCHOR studies [16]. The regulatory approval of ranibizumab for wet AMD was based on these studies, which showed improvement in visual acuity over 12 months with monthly dosing. Razumab, the world’s first biosimilar ranibizumab, has shown effectiveness for various vitreoretinal disorders in both prospective [18] and retrospective real-world studies [19]. The RE-ENACT (n = 561) study, a multicenter, retrospective study, strengthened the effectiveness of biosimilar ranibizumab in vitreoretinal disorders in Indian patients in routine clinical settings. Significant improvements were seen with various visual parameters including BCVA, central macular thickness, IRF, and SRF with biosimilar ranibizumab injections (three injections) for 3 months. The RE-ENACT study had a short-term (12 weeks) treatment duration and evaluated the use (effectiveness measured by improvements in BCVA, CMT, IRF, and SRF) of biosimilar ranibizumab in wet AMD, diabetic macular edema (DME), and retinal vein occlusion (RVO) in routine clinical settings. The RE-ENACT 2 (n = 341) study was conducted to evaluate the use (effectiveness measured by improvements in BCVA, CSFT, IRF, and SRF) of biosimilar ranibizumab for a longer term (48 weeks) in patients with wet AMD, DME, RVO and patients with myopic choroidal neovascularization (CNV), who were not evaluated in the previous RE-ENACT study. Additionally, the RE-ENACT 2 study evaluated the patients who had received up to five biosimilar ranibizumab injections, whereas the previous RE-ENACT study evaluated the patients who had received three biosimilar ranibizumab injections. The current report presents the subgroup analysis of the RE-ENACT 2 study in patients with wet AMD, which demonstrated significant improvements in visual acuity and disease outcomes with biosimilar ranibizumab. In this study, significant improvements in the logMAR BCVA scores after biosimilar ranibizumab treatment from baseline to 48 weeks were observed, consistent with the subgroup analysis of the RE-ENACT study in patients with wet AMD, which showed significant improvements in BCVA from baseline to 12 weeks [21]. The subgroup analysis in the current report demonstrated significant improvements in BCVA values in both classic and occult patients. The long-term sustained benefits of ranibizumab in the treatment of wet AMD were reported in the MARINA and ANCHOR studies. Improvements in visual acuity with ranibizumab treatment was reported at 12 months to 24 months in the randomized, double-blind MARINA trial (n = 716) [15], and at 12 months in the randomized, double-blind ANCHOR trial (n = 423) [16]. A single-center, retrospective, observational study (n = 121) showed significant improvements (P < 0.001) in mean BCVA from baseline to 12 months (43.2 ± 19.3 vs. 51.7 ± 20.1) in patients with wet AMD [25]. Significant improvement in logMar BCVA with ranibizumab treatment was reported by Figurska and Stankiewicz from baseline (0.73 ± 0.27) to 12 months (0.58 ± 0.26) in 25 patients with exudative AMD, where only three injections of ranibizumab were administered [26]. Another retrospective study showed a significant increase in the mean BCVA scores from baseline to 12 months (0.78 ± 0.33 vs. 0.61 ± 0.39, P < 0.001) in patients with exudative AMD (n = 79) [27]. These results are similar to those observed in our study where the majority of the patients received three biosimilar ranibizumab injections and the improvements in BCVA were observed up to 48 weeks. Ranibizumab treatment is associated with improvement of vision accompanied by a stabilization or reduction in CSFT [28]. The subgroup analysis in both classic and occult patients demonstrated similar results in this study with a significant reduction in the CSFT values. Significant reductions in CSFT with biosimilar ranibizumab were observed in this study at all timepoints starting at 4 weeks to 48 weeks. The mean change from baseline to 48 weeks in CSFT was − 129.57 µm, whereas the TREND study showed a mean change of − 173.3 μm in CSFT with monthly ranibizumab treatment (n = 287). The improvements in CSFT were reported throughout the 12-month follow-up period [29], similar to that observed in our study. The phase 3, double-masked MINERVA study showed a comparable mean change of − 102.7 µm in CSFT at 12 months with ranibizumab treatment (n = 119) [28]. An increase in IOP is reported after ranibizumab injection in patients with wet AMD [30]. Freund and colleagues reported less than 1 mmHg change in the IOP from baseline to 48 weeks, which lasted up to 96 weeks of follow-up, in the VEGF Trap-Eye: Investigation of Efficacy and Safety in Wet AMD (VIEW) 1 and 2 studies, which were randomized, active-controlled phase 3 trials (n = 2457) [31]. Similar results with minimal change in IOP (± 1 mmHg at most timepoints) were observed in our study. According to the Comparison of Age-related Macular Degeneration Treatments Trials Research Group, ranibizumab treatment effectively reduced the proportion of patients with IRF and SRF starting at 4 weeks, which was maintained up to 2 years of follow-up [32]. A multicenter, randomized, 24-month, phase 4, single-masked, non-inferiority clinical trial by FLUID investigators demonstrated a decline in the IRF and SRF with ranibizumab treatment throughout the study period of 2, 12, and 24 months [33], similar to the results obtained in the current report with decrease in the proportion of patients with IRF and SRF throughout the study. Overall, there were no significant differences in BCVA, CSFT, IOP, IRF, and SRF when evaluated for treatment-naïve vs. previously treated patients. Overall, this subgroup analysis demonstrated no new safety concerns with biosimilar ranibizumab in patients with wet AMD than those reported with innovator ranibizumab. The major limitation of this study included its retrospective nature because of which complete information pertaining to previous treatments, ischemia, bilaterality and severity of the disease, and adverse events could not be presented as they were not captured in the medical records. Also, the data on effectiveness parameters were not available for all patients at all timepoints, and the number of patients at each timepoint is mentioned in the respective figures. Overall, no new safety concerns compared to the innovator ranibizumab were observed. The visual acuity was measured with logMAR/Snellen’s charts in this study, which is considered inferior to the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) charts, used commonly in controlled clinical studies [34].

Conclusions

The current subgroup analysis of patients with wet AMD from the RE-ENACT 2 study showed improvements in all parameters including best corrected visual acuity, central subfield thickness, and intraretinal and subretinal fluids. Even with intravitreal injections of biosimilar ranibizumab, there was no clinically significant increase in intraocular pressure. Though the majority of the patients received only three injections of biosimilar ranibizumab, the improvements lasted up to almost a year, which reinforces Razumab, the world’s first biosimilar of ranibizumab, as an effective treatment option in managing wet age-related macular degeneration. Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material. Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 16 kb)
AMD accounts for 1.7–3.3% of all blindness diagnosed in India.
Ranibizumab is an agent approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicine Agency (EMEA) for the treatment of wet AMD.
Biosimilar ranibizumab, Razumab™, approved by the Drug Controller General of India (DCGI) in 2015, provides a cost-effective alternative, which is accessible to Indian patients.
This report presents the effectiveness of Razumab in patients with wet AMD treated in a real-world setting.
Razumab (biosimilar ranibizumab) demonstrated improvements in visual acuity and disease outcomes in patients with wet AMD without new safety issues.
  29 in total

Review 1.  Age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  Tariq Ayoub; Nishal Patel
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 2.  The epidemiology of age-related macular degeneration in the Indian subcontinent.

Authors:  Jyh Haur Woo; Srinivasan Sanjay; Kah-Guan Au Eong
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-11-12       Impact factor: 3.761

Review 3.  Clinical efficacy and safety of ranibizumab in the treatment of wet age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  Lorenzo Ferro Desideri; Fabio Barra; Simone Ferrero; Carlo Enrico Traverso; Massimo Nicolò
Journal:  Expert Opin Biol Ther       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 4.388

4.  Prevalence of age-related macular degeneration in the United States.

Authors:  David S Friedman; Benita J O'Colmain; Beatriz Muñoz; Sandra C Tomany; Cathy McCarty; Paulus T V M de Jong; Barbara Nemesure; Paul Mitchell; John Kempen
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-04

5.  What is new in the management of wet age-related macular degeneration?

Authors:  Sobha Sivaprasad; Philip Hykin
Journal:  Br Med Bull       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 4.291

6.  Effectiveness of ranibizumab intravitreal injections for exudative age-related macular degeneration treatment: 12-month outcomes.

Authors:  Figurska Małgorzata; Andrzej Stankiewicz
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2011-09

7.  Evaluation of Aflibercept Treatment Responses in Eyes with Bevacizumab/Ranibizumab-resistant Wet Age-related Macular Degeneration.

Authors:  Tuncay Topal; Taner Kar; Yıldıray Yıldırım; Sercan Koray Sağdıç; Cihan Büyükavşar; Abdullah Kaya; Ali Ayata; Murat Sönmez; Melih Hamdi Ünal
Journal:  Turk J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-06-01

8.  EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF RANIBIZUMAB FOR THE TREATMENT OF CHOROIDAL NEOVASCULARIZATION DUE TO UNCOMMON CAUSE: Twelve-Month Results of the MINERVA Study.

Authors:  Timothy Y Y Lai; Giovanni Staurenghi; Paolo Lanzetta; Frank G Holz; Shiao Hui Melissa Liew; Sabine Desset-Brethes; Harry Staines; Philip G Hykin
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 4.256

Review 9.  Wet age related macular degeneration management and follow-up.

Authors:  Malciolu Radu Alexandru; Nica Maria Alexandra
Journal:  Rom J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar

10.  Prevalence of and risk factors for age-related macular degeneration in Nepal: the Bhaktapur Retina Study.

Authors:  Raba Thapa; Sanyam Bajimaya; Govinda Paudyal; Shankar Khanal; Stevie Tan; Suman S Thapa; Ger van Rens
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-05-22
View more
  10 in total

1.  Innovator Versus Biosimilar Ranibizumab in Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy: Real-World Evidence.

Authors:  Manoj Soman; Indu Nair; Jay U Sheth; Unnikrishnan Nair
Journal:  Ophthalmol Ther       Date:  2022-04-12

2.  A Multicenter, Retrospective Study (RE-ENACT 2) on Razumab™ (World's First Biosimilar Ranibizumab) in Retinal Vein Occlusion.

Authors:  Shashikant Sharma; Mujtaba Khan; Alok Chaturvedi
Journal:  Ophthalmol Ther       Date:  2020-07-02

3.  Clinical efficacy and safety of Razumab® (CESAR) study: Our experience with the world's first biosimilar Ranibizumab.

Authors:  Lalit Verma; Mithun Thulasidas; Ajay Purohit; Avnindra Gupta; Ritesh Narula; Dinesh Talwar
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 1.848

4.  Commentary: Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapies in vitreo-retina practice: Biosimilars versus biologics.

Authors:  Giridhar Anantharaman
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 1.848

5.  Real-World Safety Outcomes of Intravitreal Ranibizumab Biosimilar (Razumab) Therapy for Chorioretinal Diseases.

Authors:  Debdulal Chakraborty; Michael W Stewart; Jay U Sheth; Tushar K Sinha; Subhendu Boral; Arnab Das; Soumen Mondal; Angshuman Mukherjee
Journal:  Ophthalmol Ther       Date:  2021-04-17

6.  Changing trends in the use of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) biosimilars: Insights from the Vitreoretinal Society of India Biosimilars of Anti-VEGF Survey.

Authors:  Jay U Sheth; Michael W Stewart; Manoj Khatri; Shashank R Gupta; Shobhit Chawla; Anand Rajendran; Raja Narayanan
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 1.848

Review 7.  Future of anti-VEGF: biosimilars and biobetters.

Authors:  Monika Kapur; Suvansh Nirula; Mayuresh P Naik
Journal:  Int J Retina Vitreous       Date:  2022-01-04

8.  Ranizurel safety evaluation in real-world -(RaSER) study.

Authors:  Ashish Sharma; Jayshree Arunaprakash; Atheeshwar Das; Ashraya Nayaka; Nilesh Kumar; Nikulaa Parachuri; Baruch D Kuppermann
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep       Date:  2022-02-02

Review 9.  Treatment Landscape of Macular Disorders in Indian Patients with the Advent of Razumab™ (World's First Biosimilar Ranibizumab): A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  Shashikant Sharma; Tanishq Sharma; Somdutt Prasad; Mahesh Gopalakrishnan; Alok Chaturvedi
Journal:  Ophthalmol Ther       Date:  2021-06-21

10.  Ranibizumab Biosimilar (Razumab) vs Innovator Ranibizumab (Lucentis) in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (n-AMD)- efficacy and safety (BIRA study).

Authors:  Ashish Sharma; Nilesh Kumar; Nikulaa Parachuri; Francesco Bandello; Baruch D Kuppermann; Anat Loewenstein
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 4.456

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.