| Literature DB >> 31882378 |
Mario Chueire de Andrade Junior1, Renato Stefanini2, Juliana Maria Gazzola1, Fernanda Louise Martinho Haddad1, Fernando Freitas Ganança1.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: There is a lack of scientific studies on the assessment of patients with vestibular disorders associated with sleep quality disorders and its impact on the balance and overall quality of life.Entities:
Keywords: Postural balance; Quality of life; Sleep disorders; Vestibular disorders
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31882378 PMCID: PMC9422609 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2019.10.013
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Braz J Otorhinolaryngol ISSN: 1808-8686
Average, standard deviation and absolute frequency (n) for the demographic data of the individuals with vestibulopathies and healthy individuals.
| Groups | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| G1 (n = 14) | G2 (n = 38) | G3 (n = 32) | ||
| Age (average, SD) | 62.28 (6.59) | 59.28 (9.04) | 55.56 (13.44) | 0.118 |
| Weight (average, SD) | 72.62 (11.09) | 70.51 (14.76) | 66.22 (11.64) | 0.229 |
| Gender | ||||
| Female, n (%) | 11 (78.57) | 33 (86.84) | 20 (62.50) | |
| Male, n (%) | 3 (21.43) | 5 (13.16) | 12 (37.50) | |
Bonferroni Analysis of Variance to a single factor.
ANOVA.
Descriptive factors (average ± SD) and comparative analysis of the Fall Index (%) and the sensory conditions of the Tetrax Interactive Balance System (Tetrax®) For the 14 individuals with vestibulopathy and good quality of sleep (G1), 38 participants with poor quality of sleep (G2) and 32 healthy individuals in the control group (G3).
| Groups | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| G1 (n = 14) Average (SD) | G2 (n = 38) Average (SD) | G3 (n = 32) Average (SD) | ||
| Fall index | 29.71 (25.02) | 46.73 (34.07) | 21.31 (18.83) | 0.012 |
Significant difference when compared with group G3 (Kruskall-Wallis’s test, followed by Dunn’s test, p < 0.05).
Descriptive values and comparative analysis of the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) for the 14 individuals with vestibulopathy in the group with good quality of sleep (G1) and 38 in the group with poor quality of sleep (G2).
| DHI | Groups | Average | Standard deviation | Minimum value | Median | Maximum value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Functional | G1 | 11.00 | 6.74 | 2.00 | 9.00 | 26.00 | 0.326 |
| G2 | 13.32 | 7.71 | 0.00 | 12.00 | 32.00 | ||
| Physical | G1 | 14.29 | 5.54 | 4.00 | 15.00 | 26.00 | 0.018 |
| G2 | 18.68 | 5.85 | 0.00 | 19.00 | 26.00 | ||
| Emotional | G1 | 6.86 | 9.40 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 32.00 | 0.076 |
| G2 | 11.21 | 6.97 | 0.00 | 10.00 | 28.00 | ||
| Total | G1 | 32.14 | 19.46 | 16.00 | 26.00 | 84.00 | 0.045 |
| G2 | 43.21 | 16.30 | 8.00 | 43.00 | 80.00 |
DHI, Dizziness Handicap Inventory.
Student’s t-test.
Significant value p < 0.05.
Level of correlation amongst the global score on the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), the Fall Index, the total Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) score and separate functional, physical and emotional scores for the 52 individuals with vestibulopathy.
| Fall index | DHI functional | DHI physical | DHI emotional | DHI total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R | 0.35 | 0.17 | 0.34 | 0.26 | 0.30 |
| 0.010 | 0.221 | 0.013 | 0.056 | 0.026 |
DHI, Dizziness Handicap Inventory.
Pearson’s Correlation Coefficient.
Significant value p < 0.05.
Figure 1Linear regression model of the correlation between the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) global score and the Dizziness handicap Inventory (DHI).
Figure 2Linear regression model of the correlation between the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) global score and the Fall Index.