Furqan A Rajput1, Lianlian Du2, Michael Woods3, Kurt Jacobson4. 1. Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States of America. Electronic address: frajput@wisc.edu. 2. Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States of America. 3. Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States of America. 4. Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States of America.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Surgical embolectomy and thrombolytic therapy are two common approaches for the treatment of large intra-cardiac or intravascular thrombi to prevent new or worsening pulmonary embolism (PE). Considering high operative mortality with surgical embolectomy and high bleeding risk with thrombolytic therapy, patients who are poor candidates for these treatments may benefit from percutaneous aspiration thrombectomy/Vacuum-assisted thrombectomy (VAT). AngioVac aspiration system was granted 510(k) clearance by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in April 2009. We present a case series to describe its use and outcomes in evacuating large caval thrombi or intracardiac masses. METHODS: We did a retrospective analysis of AngioVac catheter based thrombectomy in 16 consecutive patients treated between January 2016 and January 2019 to report case characteristics and in-hospital clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Sixteen patients (mean age 48) underwent 16 AngioVac procedures over 48 months. Indications included intracardiac mass (68.8%), caval thrombus (56.3%), and catheter associated thrombus (43.8%). 7 (43.8%) patients had concurrent PE. Peri-procedure mortality was 0% and in-hospital mortality was 12.5% at a mean follow-up of 14 days. There were no pulmonary hemorrhages, strokes or myocardial infarctions. 62.5% had a significant drop in hemoglobin, which required a blood transfusion but there was no episode of overt bleeding. CONCLUSION: The AngioVac aspiration system has been shown to be effective at aspirating large volumes of intravascular and intracardiac thrombus. It is a reasonable alternative to surgical thrombectomy in patients with large central thrombi or masses in-transit who are at risk of complicated PE.
BACKGROUND: Surgical embolectomy and thrombolytic therapy are two common approaches for the treatment of large intra-cardiac or intravascular thrombi to prevent new or worsening pulmonary embolism (PE). Considering high operative mortality with surgical embolectomy and high bleeding risk with thrombolytic therapy, patients who are poor candidates for these treatments may benefit from percutaneous aspiration thrombectomy/Vacuum-assisted thrombectomy (VAT). AngioVac aspiration system was granted 510(k) clearance by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in April 2009. We present a case series to describe its use and outcomes in evacuating large caval thrombi or intracardiac masses. METHODS: We did a retrospective analysis of AngioVac catheter based thrombectomy in 16 consecutive patients treated between January 2016 and January 2019 to report case characteristics and in-hospital clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Sixteen patients (mean age 48) underwent 16 AngioVac procedures over 48 months. Indications included intracardiac mass (68.8%), caval thrombus (56.3%), and catheter associated thrombus (43.8%). 7 (43.8%) patients had concurrent PE. Peri-procedure mortality was 0% and in-hospital mortality was 12.5% at a mean follow-up of 14 days. There were no pulmonary hemorrhages, strokes or myocardial infarctions. 62.5% had a significant drop in hemoglobin, which required a blood transfusion but there was no episode of overt bleeding. CONCLUSION: The AngioVac aspiration system has been shown to be effective at aspirating large volumes of intravascular and intracardiac thrombus. It is a reasonable alternative to surgical thrombectomy in patients with large central thrombi or masses in-transit who are at risk of complicated PE.