Richard Goodall1, Benjamin Langridge2, Sarah Onida2, Mary Ellis2, Tristan Lane2, Alun Huw Davies2. 1. Academic Section of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom; Department of Vascular Surgery, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom. Electronic address: richardgoodall@doctors.org.uk. 2. Academic Section of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom; Department of Vascular Surgery, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Median arcuate ligament syndrome (MALS) describes the clinical presentation associated with direct compression of the celiac artery by the median arcuate ligament. The poorly understood pathophysiologic mechanism, variable symptom severity, and unpredictable response to treatment make MALS a controversial diagnosis. METHODS: This review summarizes the literature pertaining to the pathophysiologic mechanism, presentation, diagnosis, and management of MALS. A suggested diagnostic workup and treatment algorithm are presented. RESULTS: Individuals with MALS present with signs and symptoms of foregut ischemia, including exercise-induced or postprandial epigastric pain, nausea, vomiting, and weight loss. Consideration of MALS in patients' diagnostic workup is typically delayed. Currently, no group consensus agreement as to the diagnostic criteria for MALS exists; duplex ultrasound, angiography, and gastric exercise tonometry are used in different combinations and with varying diagnostic values throughout the literature. Surgical management involves decompression of the median arcuate ligament's constriction of the celiac artery; robotic, laparoscopic, endoscopic retroperitoneal, and open surgical intervention can provide effective symptom relief, but long-term follow-up data (>5 years) are lacking. Patients treated nonoperatively appear to have worse outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: MALS is an important clinical entity with significant impact on affected individuals. Presenting symptoms, patient demographics, and radiologic signs are generally consistent, as is the short-to medium-term (<5 years) response to surgical intervention. Future prospective studies should directly compare long-term symptomatic and quality of life outcomes after nonoperative management with outcomes after open, laparoscopic, endoscopic retroperitoneal, and robotic celiac artery decompression to enable the development of evidence-based guidelines for the management of MALS.
BACKGROUND: Median arcuate ligament syndrome (MALS) describes the clinical presentation associated with direct compression of the celiac artery by the median arcuate ligament. The poorly understood pathophysiologic mechanism, variable symptom severity, and unpredictable response to treatment make MALS a controversial diagnosis. METHODS: This review summarizes the literature pertaining to the pathophysiologic mechanism, presentation, diagnosis, and management of MALS. A suggested diagnostic workup and treatment algorithm are presented. RESULTS: Individuals with MALS present with signs and symptoms of foregut ischemia, including exercise-induced or postprandial epigastric pain, nausea, vomiting, and weight loss. Consideration of MALS in patients' diagnostic workup is typically delayed. Currently, no group consensus agreement as to the diagnostic criteria for MALS exists; duplex ultrasound, angiography, and gastric exercise tonometry are used in different combinations and with varying diagnostic values throughout the literature. Surgical management involves decompression of the median arcuate ligament's constriction of the celiac artery; robotic, laparoscopic, endoscopic retroperitoneal, and open surgical intervention can provide effective symptom relief, but long-term follow-up data (>5 years) are lacking. Patients treated nonoperatively appear to have worse outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: MALS is an important clinical entity with significant impact on affected individuals. Presenting symptoms, patient demographics, and radiologic signs are generally consistent, as is the short-to medium-term (<5 years) response to surgical intervention. Future prospective studies should directly compare long-term symptomatic and quality of life outcomes after nonoperative management with outcomes after open, laparoscopic, endoscopic retroperitoneal, and robotic celiac artery decompression to enable the development of evidence-based guidelines for the management of MALS.
Authors: Gustavo Romero-Velez; Juan S Barajas-Gamboa; Juan Pablo Pantoja; Ricard Corcelles; John Rodriguez; Salvador Navarrete; Woosup M Park; Mathew Kroh Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2022-07-19 Impact factor: 3.453
Authors: Thomas H Shin; Bradley Rosinski; Andrew Strong; Hana Fayazzadeh; Alisan Fathalizadeh; John Rodriguez; Kevin El-Hayek Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2021-11-22 Impact factor: 3.453
Authors: Renato Farina; Pietro Valerio Foti; Andrea Conti; Francesco Aldo Iannace; Isabella Pennisi; Serafino Santonocito; Luigi Fanzone; Giuseppe Mazzone; Stefano Palmucci; Antonio Basile Journal: Am J Case Rep Date: 2020-11-08
Authors: Flavio Roberto Takeda; George Felipe Bezerra Darce; Lucas Faraco Sobrado; Luisa Leitão de Faria; Francisco Tustumi; Rubens Antonio Aissar Sallum; Manoel de Souza Rocha; Ulysses Ribeiro; Ivan Cecconello Journal: Int J Surg Case Rep Date: 2020-03-07