| Literature DB >> 31882144 |
Thomas V Häller1, Peter Kaiser2, Dominik Kaiser3, Martin C Berli4, Ilker Uçkay5, Felix W A Waibel3.
Abstract
Ray resection is frequently performed in cases of infection or ischemia, but the literature is scarce concerning its outcome as a definitive treatment. In this retrospective cohort study, we reviewed our cohort with transmetatarsal ray resection with a mean follow-up of 36.3 months. Reulcerations, transfer ulcers, and reamputations were determined. Risk factor analysis for revision surgery was conducted. Among 185 patients, 71 (38.4%) had revision surgery within a mean of 1.4 ± 2.6 years (range 2 days to 12.9 years), 22 (11.9%) had major amputations, 49 (26.5%) had minor amputations, 11 (5.9%) had same-ray reulceration, 40 (21.6%) had transfer ulceration, and 2 (1.1%) had both reulceration and transfer ulceration. Occurrence of a postoperative ulcer was statistically significantly associated with revision surgery (p < .01). In conclusion, metatarsal ray resection is a reasonable treatment option in cases of forefoot ischemia or infection to prevent major amputation but fails in 11.9%, and reulceration is associated with further revisions, making ulcer prevention paramount.Entities:
Keywords: diabetes; forefoot; infection; ray resection; revision surgery; transmetatarsal amputation
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 31882144 DOI: 10.1053/j.jfas.2019.06.003
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Foot Ankle Surg ISSN: 1067-2516 Impact factor: 1.286