| Literature DB >> 31881999 |
Ahmed Gharib Khamis1, Akwilina Wendelin Mwanri2, Julius Edward Ntwenya3, Katharina Kreppel4,5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Undernutrition poses a serious health challenge in developing countries and Tanzania has the highest undernutrition burden of Eastern and Southern Africa. Poor infant and young child feeding practices have been identified as the main causes for undernutrition. As dietary diversity is a major requirement if children are to get all essential nutrients, it can thus be used as one of the core indicators when assessing feeding practices and nutrition of children. Therefore, adequate information on the association between dietary diversity and undernutrition to identify potential strategies for the prevention of undernutrition is critical. Here we examined to what extent dietary diversity is associated with undernutrition among children of 6 to 23 months in Tanzania.Entities:
Keywords: Complementary feeding; Dietary diversity; Infants and young children; Pediatric; Tanzania; Undernutrition
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31881999 PMCID: PMC6935228 DOI: 10.1186/s12887-019-1897-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Pediatr ISSN: 1471-2431 Impact factor: 2.125
Fig. 1Selection of children of 6 to 23 months from TDHS 2015-16
Descriptive characteristics of the children aged 6–23 months included in the study (N = 2960)
| Variable | Mean (SD) and Frequency (% |
|---|---|
| Age of Children (months) | |
| Prevalence of undernutrition | |
| Stunting (HAZ < -2SD) | 927 (31%) |
| Wasting (WHZ < -2SD) | 179 (6%) |
| Underweight (WAZ < -2SD) | 423 (14%) |
| Gender | |
| Male | 1459 (49%) |
| Female | 1501 (51%) |
| Place of Birth | |
| Health facility | 1913 (64%) |
| At home | 1001 (34%) |
| Other places | 46 (2%) |
| Size at Birth | |
| Above 2.5 kg | 1801 (61%) |
| Below 2.5 kg | 100 (3%) |
| Not reported | 1059 (36%) |
| Presence of Diarrhea | |
| YES | 625 (21%) |
| NO | 2335 (79%) |
| Presence of Fever | |
| YES | 651 (22%) |
| NO | 2309 (78%) |
*HAZ Height-for-Age Z-scores, WHZ Weight-for-Height Z-scores, WAZ Weight-for-Age Z-scores, SD Standard deviation.
Fig. 2Proportion of children in terms of their food consumption
Fig. 3Proportion of children reaching the recommended minimum dietary diversity
Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis of the association between dietary diversity and stunting, wasting and underweight
| Stunting (HAZ < −2SD) | Wasting (WHZ < −2SD) | Underweight (WAZ < −2SD) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diversity score | OR (95% CI) | AORa (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | AORa (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | AORa (95% CI) | |||
| 0 | 18 | Ref. | Ref. | 8 | Ref. | Ref. | 11 | Ref. | Ref. |
| 1 | 93 | 0.8 (0.43–1.47) | 0.65 (0.35–1.23) | 29 | 0.56 (0.24–1.3) | 0.5 (0.21–1.18) | 54 | 0.7 (0.37–1.6) | 0.67 (0.32–1.39) |
| 2 | 285 | 0.94 (0.53–1.69) | 0.57 (0.31–1.05) | 50 | 0.34 (0.15–0.76)** | 0.3 (0.13–0.7)** | 134 | 0.69 (0.35–1.38) | 0.52 (0.26–1.06) |
| 3 | 311 | 1.08 (0.61–1.94) | 0.61 (0.33–1.12) | 51 | 0.35 (0.15–0.78)* | 0.32 (0.14–0.73)** | 136 | 0.71 (0.35–1.41) | 0.52 (0.26–1.05) |
| 4 | 166 | 0.91 (0.5–1.64) | 0.49 (0.26–0.91)* | 31 | 0.35 (0.15–0.82)* | 0.32 (0.13–0.76)* | 67 | 0.56 (0.27–1.14) | 0.4 (0.19–0.83)* |
| 5 | 46 | 0.68 (0.35–1.31) | 0.36 (0.18–0.72)** | 9 | 0.3 (0.11–0.82)* | 0.26 (0.09–0.74)* | 19 | 0.46 (0.20–1.04) | 0.32 (0.14–0.74)** |
| 6 | 6 | 0.44 (1.55–1.25) | 0.25 (0.85–0.72)* | 1 | 0.17 (0.02–1.49) | 0.16 (0.19–1.38) | 1 | 0.12 (0.01–0.98)* | 0.09 (0.01–0.74)* |
| 7 | 2 | 0.51 (0.9–2.67) | 0.26 (0.05–1.38) | 0 | – | – | 1 | 0.44 (0.51–3.88) | 0.31 (0.03–2.7) |
| Minimum Dietary Diversity | OR (95% CI) | AORa (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | AORa (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | AORa (95% CI) | |||
| YES (≥4 food groups) | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | |||
| NO (< 4 food groups) | 1.19 (0.99–1.42) | 1.37 (1.13–1.65)** | 1.19 (0.83–1.71) | 1.18 (0.82–1.69) | 1.4 (1.08–1.79)** | 1.49 (1.15–1.92)** | |||
**P < .01, *P < .05; aAdjusted for age, gender, diarrhea and fever, CI confidence interval, OR Odds ratio, AOR Adjusted Odds ratio, Ref reference category. Both models fit the data equally well (all P > 0.10 in likelihood ratio test); HAZ Height-for-Age Z-scores, WHZ Weight-for-Height Z-scores, WAZ Weight-for-Age Z-scores, SD Standard deviation.
Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis of the association between food groups and stunting, wasting and underweight
| Variable | Stunting (HAZ < -2SD) | Wasting (WHZ < -2SD) | Underweight (WAZ < -2SD) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crude | Modela | Crude | Modela | Crude | Modela | |
| OR (95% CI) | AOR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | AOR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | AOR (95% CI) | |
| FOOD GROUPS | ||||||
| Grains roots and tubers | ||||||
| YES | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. |
| NO | 0.89 (0.67–1.17) | 1.05 (0.78–1.41) | 1.59 (1.01–2.52)* | 1.62 (1.02–2.58)* | 1.22 (0.86–1.72) | 1.34 (0.94–1.90) |
| Legumes and nuts | ||||||
| YES | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. |
| NO | 0.9 (0.77–1.06) | 0.96 (0.81–1.14) | 1.4 (1.0–1.96)* | 1.38 (0.98–1.94) | 1.1 (0.87–1.35) | 1.1 (0.89–1.39) |
| Milk and Dairy products | ||||||
| YES | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. |
| NO | 1.38 (1.13–1.67)** | 1.34 (1.09–1.63)** | 1.26 (0.85–1.86) | 1.24 (0.83–1.83) | 1.26 (0.97–1.64) | 1.22 (0.94–1.59) |
| Meat and flesh | ||||||
| YES | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. |
| NO | 1.07 (0.91–1.26) | 1.27 (1.07–1.53)** | 1.0 (0.73–1.38) | 0.97 (0.7–1.34) | 0.98 (0.79–1.22) | 1.04 (0.89–1.3) |
| Eggs | ||||||
| YES | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. |
| NO | 1.37 (0.99–1.89) | 1.46 (1.05–2.03)* | 1.92 (0.89–4.15) | 1.95 (0.9–4.23) | 2.1 (1.24–3.52)** | 2.1 (1.29–3.69)** |
| Vitamin A rich fruits and vegetables | ||||||
| YES | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. |
| NO | 0.93 (0.79–1.1) | 1.18 (0.99–1.41) | 1.29 (0.95–1.76) | 1.29 (0.94–1.78) | 1.29 (1.04–1.59)* | 1.46 (1.17–1.83)** |
| Other fruits and vegetables | ||||||
| YES | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. |
| NO | 1.01 (0.83–1.22) | 1.07 (0.88–1.31) | 0.88 (0.61–1.26) | 0.9 (0.63–1.29) | 1.06 (0.82–1.37) | 1.11 (0.86–1.44) |
**P < .01, *P < .05; aAdjusted for age, gender, diarrhea and fever; CI confidence interval, OR Odds ratio, AOR Adjusted Odds ratio, Ref reference category, HAZ Height-for-Age Z-scores, WHZ Weight-for-Height Z-scores, WAZ Weight-for-Age Z-scores, SD Standard deviation