| Literature DB >> 31881677 |
See Meng Lim1,2,3, Amanda J Page2,4, Hui Li2,4, John Carragher1, Iain Searle5, Sarah Robertson6, Beverly Muhlhausler1,2,7.
Abstract
High amylose wheat (HAW) has a higher resistant starch content and lower glycaemic index than standard amylose wheat (SAW), which may be associated with health benefits. This study aimed to determine the effects of replacing SAW with HAW on metabolic and reproductive parameters in male and female mice. Male and female C57BL/6 mice were randomly divided into groups (n = 8/group/sex) and fed either a SAW65 (65% SAW w/w; control), HAW35 (35% HAW w/w), HAW50 (50% HAW w/w) or HAW65 (65% HAW w/w) diet for eight weeks. In male but not female, the HAW65 group had a lower abdominal circumference, relative total fat mass, relative gonadal fat mass and plasma leptin concentration compared to the HAW35 group. There were no differences in fasting blood glucose concentrations or plasma concentrations of cholesterol, triglycerides or non-esterified fatty acids between groups in either males or females. The HAW-fed males had a higher testicular weight and HAW-fed females spent less time in diestrus and a longer time in metestrus compared to the SAW-fed mice. Higher dietary intake of HAW appears to reduce abdominal fat deposition compared to the lower level of HAW in a sexually dimorphic manner. The impacts on reproductive parameters in the HAW-fed mice require further investigation.Entities:
Keywords: high amylose wheat; low glycaemic index; metabolic health; reproductive function
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31881677 PMCID: PMC7019933 DOI: 10.3390/nu12010061
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Composition of experimental diets.
| Ingredient (g) | SAW65 | HAW35 | HAW50 | HAW65 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard amylose wheat | 650.00 | 300.00 | 150.00 | 0.00 |
| High amylose wheat | 0.00 | 350.00 | 500.00 | 650.00 |
| Maltodextrin | 42.97 | 42.97 | 42.97 | 42.97 |
| Sucrose | 27.72 | 27.72 | 27.72 | 27.72 |
| Casein | 140.00 | 140.00 | 140.00 | 140.00 |
| L-cystine | 1.80 | 1.80 | 1.80 | 1.80 |
| Soybean oil | 40.00 | 40.00 | 40.00 | 40.00 |
| Cellulose | 50.00 | 50.00 | 50.00 | 50.00 |
| Mineral mix, AIN-93M-MX | 35.00 | 35.00 | 35.00 | 35.00 |
| Vitamin mix, AIN-93-VX | 10.00 | 10.00 | 10.00 | 10.00 |
| Choline bitartrate | 2.50 | 2.50 | 2.50 | 2.50 |
| TBHQ, antioxidant | 0.008 | 0.008 | 0.008 | 0.008 |
| Total | 1000 | 1000 | 1000 | 1000 |
SAW, standard amylose wheat; HAW, high amylose wheat.
Nutrient analysis of experimental diets 1.
| SAW65 | HAW35 | HAW50 | HAW65 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Energy (kcal/g) | 3.76 | 3.86 | 3.90 | 4.05 |
| Moisture (g/100 g) | 10.4 | 8.2 | 8.1 | 5.9 |
| Fat (Mojonnier extraction; g/100 g) | 5.5 | 6.4 | 6.9 | 7.6 |
| Protein (N × 6.26; g/100 g) | 20.9 | 21.7 | 21.7 | 22.5 |
| Ash (g/100 g) | 3.1 | 3.3 | 3.8 | 3.5 |
| Carbohydrates (by difference; g/100 g) | 60 | 60 | 60 | 61 |
| Calcium (mg/kg) | 5000 | 5000 | 5300 | 5300 |
| Iron (mg/kg) | 80 | 72 | 82 | 83 |
| Total dietary fibre (%) | 13.5 | 16.2 | 17.3 | 18.5 |
| Insoluble dietary fibre (%) | 10.4 | 12.1 | 12.9 | 13.6 |
| Soluble dietary fibre (by difference; %) | 3.0 | 4.0 | 4.5 | 4.9 |
| Amylopectin (%) | 36.2 | 31.5 | 29.5 | 27.5 |
| Amylose (%) | 4.5 | 4.2 | 3.4 | <4.0 |
| Total Starch (%) | 40.7 | 33.6 | 30.5 | 27.5 |
| Resistant Starch (%) | 1.2 | 1.6 | 1.7 | 1.9 |
| Rapid Digestibility (%) | 12.7 | 11.9 | 11.6 | 11.3 |
| Slow Digestibility (%) | 32.8 | 27.5 | 25.3 | 23.0 |
SAW, standard amylose wheat; HAW, high amylose wheat. 1 The fibre, starch and digestibility measures of HAW35 and HAW50 diets were calculated based on the proportions of SAW and HAW in the diet.
Figure 1Weekly changes of (A) food intake and (B) energy intake in (i) male and (ii) female mice fed diets containing 65% standard amylose wheat (SAW65), 30% SAW and 35% high amylose wheat (HAW35), 15% SAW and 50% HAW (HAW50) or 65% HAW (HAW65) for six weeks. Data are means ± SEM (n = 8 mice/group). Values with different superscripts indicate significant difference (p < 0.05) by two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test.
Figure 2Metabolic parameters of mice fed diets containing 65% standard amylose wheat (SAW65), 30% SAW and 35% high amylose wheat (HAW35), 15% SAW and 50% HAW (HAW50) or 65% HAW (HAW65) in weeks 7 and 8. Twenty-four-hour, light- and dark-phase average energy expenditure (A: male; E: female); average RQ (B: male; F: female); total water intake (C: male; G: female); and total ambulatory activity of (D) male and (H) female mice are shown. Data are means ± SEM (n = 7 or 8 mice/group). Values with different superscripts indicate significant difference (p < 0.05) by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test.
Body weight, abdominal circumference, nose–anus length, relative fat mass and relative organ weights of male and female mice at the end of the eight-week feeding period.
| SAW65 | HAW35 | HAW50 | HAW65 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| End point BW 1 (g) | 22.64 ± 0.41 a | 25.96 ± 0.26 b | 25.01 ± 0.34 b | 24.56 ± 0.43 b |
| Weight gain 2 (g) | 1.89 ± 0.21 a | 3.71 ± 0.30 b | 3.71 ± 0.29 b | 3.48 ± 0.33 b |
| Abdominal circumference (cm) | 7.04 ± 0.10 ab | 7.28 ± 0.11 a | 6.79 ± 0.14 ab | 6.76 ± 0.16 b |
| Nose–anus length (cm) | 9.16 ± 0.06 | 9.24 ± 0.10 | 9.10 ± 0.04 | 9.08 ± 0.06 |
| Total fat mass (mg/g BW) | 28.58 ± 4.95 ab | 40.78 ± 3.00 a | 32.72 ± 2.84 ab | 24.48 ± 2.50 b |
| Gonadal (mg/g BW) | 11.10 ± 2.00 a | 18.51 ± 1.59 b | 14.42 ± 1.55 ab | 9.93 ± 1.35 a |
| Retroperitoneal (mg/g BW) | 4.15 ± 0.74 | 6.55 ± 1.19 | 4.59 ± 0.94 | 3.25 ± 0.57 |
| Mesentery (mg/g BW) | 8.75 ± 1.64 | 10.29 ± 0.55 | 8.02 ± 0.55 | 7.42 ± 0.58 |
| Interscapular (mg/g BW) | 4.58 ± 0.79 | 5.43 ± 0.46 | 5.69 ± 0.43 | 3.89 ± 0.47 |
| Kidneys (mg/g BW) | 11.98 ± 0.22 | 12.81 ± 0.47 | 12.49 ± 0.22 | 13.09 ± 0.44 |
| Liver (mg/g BW) | 40.40 ± 0.54 | 38.74 ± 1.80 | 43.39 ± 0.92 | 42.42 ± 2.06 |
| Pancreas (mg/g BW) | 4.41 ± 0.29 | 4.53 ± 0.16 | 3.92 ± 0.45 | 3.92 ± 0.17 |
| Spleen (mg/g BW) | 2.36 ± 0.11 | 2.60 ± 0.13 | 2.40 ± 0.10 | 2.44 ± 0.14 |
|
| ||||
| End point BW 1 (g) | 17.04 ± 0.20 | 18.21 ± 0.38 | 18.05 ± 0.40 | 18.01 ± 0.23 |
| Weight gain 2 (g) | 1.37 ± 0.43 a | 3.23 ± 0.31 b | 3.00 ± 0.59 ab | 2.56 ± 0.30 ab |
| Abdominal circumference (cm) | 6.56 ± 0.06 | 6.59 ± 0.10 | 6.63 ± 0.06 | 6.45 ± 0.08 |
| Nose–anus length (cm) | 8.55 ± 0.06 | 8.80 ± 0.06 | 8.70 ± 0.08 | 8.60 ± 0.09 |
| Total fat mass (mg/g BW) | 27.58 ± 0.99 | 23.89 ± 2.64 | 23.39 ± 1.84 | 23.33 ± 1.04 |
| Gonadal (mg/g BW) | 10.82 ± 0.74 | 8.43 ± 1.22 | 9.02 ± 1.05 | 8.52 ± 0.64 |
| Retroperitoneal (mg/g BW) | 2.43 ± 0.24 | 2.40 ± 0.38 | 2.85 ± 0.32 | 2.15 ± 0.16 |
| Mesentery (mg/g BW) | 8.43 ± 1.28 | 7.38 ± 0.82 | 6.89 ± 0.44 | 8.40 ± 0.52 |
| Interscapular (mg/g BW) | 5.89 ± 0.43 | 5.68 ± 0.63 | 4.63 ± 0.52 | 4.26 ± 0.32 |
| Kidneys (mg/g BW) | 13.23 ± 0.30 | 14.26 ± 0.38 | 13.40 ± 0.48 | 13.15 ± 0.96 |
| Liver (mg/g BW) | 42.61 ± 0.49 | 40.64 ± 2.04 | 43.70 ± 1.02 | 45.08 ± 0.93 |
| Pancreas (mg/g BW) | 4.62 ± 0.30 | 4.31 ± 0.34 | 4.22 ± 0.42 | 4.53 ± 0.28 |
| Spleen (mg/g BW) | 3.09 ± 0.16 | 3.93 ± 0.58 | 3.22 ± 0.39 | 3.06 ± 0.15 |
Mice fed diets containing 65% standard amylose wheat (SAW65), 30% SAW and 35% high amylose wheat (HAW35), 15% SAW and 50% HAW (HAW50) or 65% HAW (HAW65). 1 Measured before blood and tissue collection at fasted state. 2 Difference between the body weights of week 8 and pre-intervention values. Data are means ± SEM (n = 8 mice/group). Values with different superscripts in a row indicate significant difference (p < 0.05) by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test.
Figure 3Weekly changes of body weight in (A) male and (B) female mice fed diets containing 65% standard amylose wheat (SAW65), 30% SAW and 35% high amylose wheat (HAW35), 15% SAW and 50% HAW (HAW50) or 65% HAW (HAW65) for eight weeks. Data are means ± SEM (n = 8 mice/group). Values with different superscripts indicate significant difference (p < 0.05) by two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test.
Biochemical analyses of blood/plasma from male and female mice at the end of the eight-week feeding period.
| Parameter | SAW65 | HAW35 | HAW50 | HAW65 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | ||||
| Fasting blood glucose (mmol/L) | 7.59 ± 0.48 | 8.15 ± 0.66 | 8.14 ± 0.69 | 8.20 ± 0.63 |
| Total cholesterol (mmol/L) | 2.54 ± 0.07 | 2.66 ± 0.23 | 2.50 ± 0.06 | 2.35 ± 0.21 |
| Triglycerides (mmol/L) | 0.76 ± 0.04 | 0.85 ± 0.06 | 0.94 ± 0.06 | 0.87 ± 0.06 |
| Non-esterified fatty acids (mmol/L) | 0.94 ± 0.08 | 0.84 ± 0.04 | 0.91 ± 0.08 | 1.00 ± 0.07 |
| Leptin (ng/mL) | 0.16 ± 0.06 a | 0.48 ± 0.12 b | 0.21 ± 0.04 ab | 0.09 ± 0.03 a |
| Female | ||||
| Fasting blood glucose | 6.58 ± 0.45 | 7.43 ± 0.47 | 7.30 ± 0.28 | 7.11 ± 0.18 |
| Total cholesterol (mmol/L) | 1.70 ± 0.03 | 1.71 ± 0.11 | 1.61 ± 0.10 | 1.72 ± 0.05 |
| Triglycerides (mmol/L) | 0.74 ± 0.03 | 0.70 ± 0.03 | 0.70 ± 0.03 | 0.71 ± 0.04 |
| Non-esterified fatty acids (mmol/L) | 0.81 ± 0.03 | 0.82 ± 0.06 | 0.88 ± 0.02 | 0.80 ± 0.05 |
| Leptin (ng/mL) | 0.15 ± 0.03 | 0.10 ± 0.02 | 0.14 ± 0.04 | 0.18 ± 0.03 |
Mice fed diets containing 65% standard amylose wheat (SAW65), 30% SAW and 35% high amylose wheat (HAW35), 15% SAW and 50% HAW (HAW50) or 65% HAW (HAW65). Data are means ± SEM (n = 8 mice/group). Values with different superscripts in a row indicate significant difference (p < 0.05) by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test.
Figure 4Weights of (A) testes or (B) uterus and (C) ovaries in male and female mice fed diets containing 65% standard amylose wheat (SAW65), 30% SAW and 35% high amylose wheat (HAW35), 15% SAW and 50% HAW (HAW50) or 65% HAW (HAW65) at the end of the eight-week feeding period. Data are means ± SEM (n = 8 mice/group). Values with different superscripts indicate significant difference (p < 0.05) by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test.
Figure 5Average (A) number and (B) length in days of oestrus cycles and total number of days in (C) proestrus, (D) oestrus, (E) metestrus and (F) diestrus in female mice fed diets containing 65% standard amylose wheat (SAW65), 30% SAW and 35% high amylose wheat (HAW35), 15% SAW and 50% HAW (HAW50) or 65% HAW (HAW65) over 24 days from weeks 4 to 7. Data are means ± SEM (n = 8 mice/group). Values with different superscripts indicate significant difference (p < 0.05) by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test.