Literature DB >> 31881391

Improving the quality conduct and efficiency of clinical trials with training: Recommendations for preparedness and qualification of investigators and delegates.

Jimmy Bechtel1, Tina Chuck2, Annemarie Forrest3, Christine Hildebrand4, Janette Panhuis5, Suzanne R Pattee6, Sabrina Comic-Savic7, Teresa Swezey8.   

Abstract

The Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative (CTTI) Investigator Qualification Project addresses the need for a more efficient and effective means of identifying qualified clinical investigators and delegates. Selection of investigators and delegates who are qualified by training and experience to conduct clinical trials is essential to safeguarding protections for study participants and ensuring data quality and integrity. Sponsors generally document investigator qualification through training on the principles of good clinical practice (GCP), as defined by the International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH), adopted by regulatory authorities in the United States, Japan and the European Union. Although these GCP principles provide an important foundation for promoting the conduct of quality clinical trials, the industry standard "one-size-fits-all" GCP training may not fully prepare investigators and delegates for conducting quality clinical trials. Routine GCP training alone may not be sufficient to prepare an inexperienced member of a site team, while repeating such training is unlikely to enhance the qualifications of an experienced researcher. The CTTI project team used findings from qualitative research activities, as well as input from an expert meeting with multiple stakeholders, to identify gaps and redundancies in the current training of investigators and their delegates and recommend practical, action-based solutions. CTTI provides recommendations on how to implement a more efficient and effective means of preparedness and qualification of investigators and delegates, determining whether a site team is a good fit for a particular protocol, and improving the quality of clinical trial conduct.
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical trials; Good clinical practice; Investigator qualification; Investigator training

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31881391      PMCID: PMC8276623          DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2019.105918

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials        ISSN: 1551-7144            Impact factor:   2.226


  6 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review of on-site monitoring methods for health-care randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Rhiannon C Macefield; Andrew D Beswick; Jane M Blazeby; J Athene Lane
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.486

Review 2.  Good Clinical Practice Guidance and Pragmatic Clinical Trials: Balancing the Best of Both Worlds.

Authors:  Robert J Mentz; Adrian F Hernandez; Lisa G Berdan; Tyrus Rorick; Emily C O'Brien; Jenny C Ibarra; Lesley H Curtis; Eric D Peterson
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  The Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative: Methodology supporting the mission.

Authors:  Amy Corneli; Zachary Hallinan; Gerrit Hamre; Brian Perry; Jennifer C Goldsack; Sara B Calvert; Annemarie Forrest
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.486

4.  More than a box to check: Research sponsor and clinical investigator perspectives on making GCP training relevant.

Authors:  Teresa Swezey; F Hunter McGuire; Patricia Hurley; Janette Panhuis; Kathy Goldstein; Tina Chuck; Carrie Dombeck; Brian Perry; Christina Brennan; Natasha Phrsai; Amy Corneli
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials Commun       Date:  2020-07-02

5.  Good Clinical Practice Training: Identifying Key Elements and Strategies for Increasing Training Efficiency.

Authors:  Jaime Arango; Tina Chuck; Susan S Ellenberg; Bridget Foltz; Colleen Gorman; Heidi Hinrichs; Susan McHale; Kunal Merchant; Jonathan Seltzer; Stephanie Shapley; Gretchen Wild
Journal:  Ther Innov Regul Sci       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 1.778

6.  A survey of facilitators and barriers to recruitment to the MAGNETIC trial.

Authors:  Geetinder Kaur; Rosalind L Smyth; Colin V E Powell; Paula Williamson
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 2.279

  6 in total
  2 in total

1.  More than a box to check: Research sponsor and clinical investigator perspectives on making GCP training relevant.

Authors:  Teresa Swezey; F Hunter McGuire; Patricia Hurley; Janette Panhuis; Kathy Goldstein; Tina Chuck; Carrie Dombeck; Brian Perry; Christina Brennan; Natasha Phrsai; Amy Corneli
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials Commun       Date:  2020-07-02

2.  Clinical Investigator Training Program (CITP) - A practical and pragmatic approach to conveying clinical investigator competencies and training to busy clinicians.

Authors:  Mansoor Saleh; Gurudatta Naik; Penelope Jester; Cynthia Joiner; Elizabeth Westfall; David W Kimberlin; James Willig; David Redden; Juliette Southworth; Mark T Dransfield
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials Commun       Date:  2020-06-12
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.