Literature DB >> 31881283

Outcome of Multiple Myeloma with Chromosome 1q Gain and 1p Deletion after Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Propensity Score Matched Analysis.

Ankur Varma1, Dawen Sui2, Denái R Milton2, Guilin Tang3, Neeraj Saini4, Omar Hasan4, Akash Mukherjee4, Jacinth Joy Joseph4, Qaiser Bashir4, Gabriela Rondon4, Samer Srour4, Uday R Popat4, Chitra M Hosing4, Yago Nieto4, Partow Kebriaei4, Amin M Alousi4, Sairah Ahmed3, Rohtesh Mehta4, Issa F Khouri4, Haris Ahmed4, Swaminathan Iyer5, Donna M Weber5, Sheeba K Thomas5, Elisabet Manasanch5, Hans C Lee5, Krina Patel5, Stefan O Ciurea4, Elizabeth J Shpall4, Robert Z Orlowski5, Richard E Champlin4, Muzaffar H Qazilbash6.   

Abstract

The gain/amplification CKS1B gene at chromosome region 1q21 (1q+) is one of the most common genetic aberrations in multiple myeloma (MM). Amplification of CKS1B is frequently associated with the deletion of the CDKN2C gene at chromosome region 1p32 (1p-), which is also associated with inferior outcomes. In this retrospective study, we evaluated the outcomes of patients with 1q+ and/or 1p- after high-dose therapy and autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (auto-HCT). From January 2006 to December 2015, 1491 newly diagnosed patients with MM underwent upfront high-dose therapy and auto-HCT at our institution. Of those, 899 had the fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) data available. FISH was performed at diagnosis and before the start of induction in 686 (76%) patients and after the initiation of induction therapy in 213 (24%) patients. We identified 100 patients with 1q+ and/or 1p- by FISH from the cohort of 899 patients. A control group (n = 287) with diploid cytogenetics and normal FISH panel was selected from the same cohort. From the above 2 cohorts, using a propensity score matched analysis, we identified matched controls for 85 of the 100 patients with 1q+/1p-. Patients were matched for age at auto-HCT, sex, International Staging System stage, induction regimen, creatinine level, disease status at auto-HCT, conditioning regimen, and maintenance therapy. Sixty-seven (79%), 4 (5%), and 14 (16%) patients had 1q+, 1p-, or both 1q+ and 1p-, respectively. There was no significant difference in induction therapy, preparative regimen, or maintenance therapy between the 1q+/1p- and the control group. The median follow-up time for all patients was 29.2 months (range, 0.29 to 84.96). The cumulative incidence of 100-day nonrelapse mortality was 1.2% and 0% for the 1q+/1p- and the control group, respectively. Forty-two patients (50%) in the 1q+/1p- group achieved complete response compared with 40 patients (47%) in the control group. The estimated 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 41% and 79% for the 1q+/1p- group and 56% and 86% for the control group. Patients in the 1q+/1p- group were at significantly increased risk of progression or death compared to the control group (hazard ratio [HR], 2.21; confidence interval [CI], 1.18 to 4.16; P = .014). No significant association between OS in the 2 groups was observed. The outcome of the 1q+/1p- alone (with no additional high-risk cytogenetics) and the propensity score matched control groups was also compared. Median PFS for the 1q+/1p- alone subgroup was 26.6 months, compared with 38.8 months for the control group (HR, 1.9; CI, 0.9 to 4.08; P = .09). The median OS had not been reached for the 1q+/1p- alone subgroup and was 81.1 months for the control group (HR, 1.25; CI, 0.3 to 4.6; P= .73). 1q+/1p- abnormalities with amplification of CKS1B and deletion ofCDKN2Cgenes were associated with shorter PFS compared with a propensity score matched group of patients with diploid cytogenetics and normal a FISH panel. The outcomes of 1q+/1p- patients with MM have improved with the use of more effective induction, conditioning, and maintenance therapy compared with historical controls, but we still need more effective therapeutic approaches to fully overcome the negative impact of 1q+/1p-.
Copyright © 2019 American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Autologous stem cell transplantation; CDKN2C; CKS1B; Multiple myeloma

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31881283     DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2019.12.726

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant        ISSN: 1083-8791            Impact factor:   5.742


  6 in total

1.  Chromosome 1 abnormalities and survival of patients with multiple myeloma in the era of novel agents.

Authors:  Smith Giri; Scott F Huntington; Rong Wang; Amer M Zeidan; Nikolai Podoltsev; Steven D Gore; Xiaomei Ma; Cary P Gross; Amy J Davidoff; Natalia Neparidze
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2020-05-26

2.  Outcomes of patients with multiple myeloma harboring chromosome 1q gain/amplification in the era of modern therapy.

Authors:  Xiao Hu; Cherng-Horng Wu; Janet M Cowan; Raymond L Comenzo; Cindy Varga
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 3.673

Review 3.  Increasing genomic discovery in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: defining disease biology and its correlation to risk.

Authors:  Patrick Hagen; Mark Sellin; Stephanie Berg; Jiwang Zhang
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 4.030

4.  The influence of high-efficiency particulate air filtration on mortality among multiple myeloma patients receiving autologous stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Chun-Kuang Tsai; Chiu-Mei Yeh; Ying-Chung Hong; Po-Min Chen; Jin-Hwang Liu; Jyh-Pyng Gau; Chia-Jen Liu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  Chromosome 1q21 abnormalities in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Timothy M Schmidt; Rafael Fonseca; Saad Z Usmani
Journal:  Blood Cancer J       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 11.037

Review 6.  Genome Instability in Multiple Myeloma: Facts and Factors.

Authors:  Anna Y Aksenova; Anna S Zhuk; Artem G Lada; Irina V Zotova; Elena I Stepchenkova; Ivan I Kostroma; Sergey V Gritsaev; Youri I Pavlov
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 6.639

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.