Literature DB >> 31881256

Posterior Cruciate Ligament.

Jorge Chahla1, Brady T Williams1, Robert F LaPrade2.   

Abstract

Improved understanding of the anatomy and biomechanics of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) has led to the evolution and improvement of anatomic-based reconstructions. The PCL is composed of the larger anterolateral bundle (ALB) and the smaller posteromedial bundle (PMB). On the femoral side, the ALB spans from the trochlear point to the medial arch point on the roof of the notch, while the PMB occupies the medial wall from the medial arch point to the most posterior aspect of the articular cartilage. Because of these broad and distinct attachments, the bundles have a load-sharing, synergistic and codominant relationship. Both restrict posterior translation; however, the ALB has a proportionally larger role in restricting translation throughout flexion, whereas the PMB has a role comparable to that of the ALB in full extension. In addition, the PMB resists internal rotational at greater flexion angles (> 90°). Consequently, it is difficult to restore native kinematics with a single graft. Biomechanical analysis of single- versus double-bundle PCL reconstructions (SB PCLR vs DB PCLR) demonstrates improved restoration of native kinematics with a DB PCLR, including resistance to posterior translation throughout flexion (15°-120°) and internal rotation in deeper flexion (90°-120°). Similarly, clinical research demonstrates excellent outcomes following DB PCLR, including functional outcomes comparable to those of anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions, with no significant differences between isolated and multiligament PCL injuries. Compared to SB PCLR, systematic review has demonstrated the superiority of DB PCLR based on objective postoperative stress radiography and International Knee Documentation Committee scores in randomized trials. In addition to reconstruction techniques, recent research has identified other factors that impact kinematics and PCL forces, including decreased tibial slope, which leads to increased graft stresses, and incidence of native PCL injuries. As the understanding of these other contributing factors evolves, so will surgical and treatment algorithms that will further improve patients' outcomes.
Copyright © 2019 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31881256     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.12.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  4 in total

1.  Single and double bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction yield comparable clinical and functional outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nikolas L Krott; Lawrence Wengle; Daniel Whelan; Michael Wild; Marcel Betsch
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  Operative management of isolated posterior cruciate ligament injuries improves stability and reduces the incidence of secondary osteoarthritis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Wouter Schroven; G Vles; J Verhaegen; M Roussot; J Bellemans; S Konan
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-09-10       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  All-Autograft Multiligament Knee Reconstruction of the Posterior Cruciate Ligament, Anterior Cruciate Ligament, and Posterolateral Corner (KD-IIIL).

Authors:  Iftach Hetsroni; Gideon Mann; Gabriel Marino; Nissim Ohana
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2021-05-24

4.  Preoperative Factors Predicting the Preservation of the Posterior Cruciate Ligament in Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yi Wang; Liyi Zhang; Jianhao Lin; Dan Xing; Qiang Liu; Diange Zhou
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 2.279

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.