Literature DB >> 31880950

Efficacy of Ruxolitinib in Patients With Chronic Neutrophilic Leukemia and Atypical Chronic Myeloid Leukemia.

Kim-Hien T Dao1, Jason Gotlib2, Michael M N Deininger3, Stephen T Oh4, Jorge E Cortes5, Robert H Collins6, Elliot F Winton7, Dana R Parker1, Hyunjung Lee1, Anna Reister1, Samantha Savage1, Chase Brockett1, Nan Subbiah1, Richard D Press8, Philipp W Raess8, Michael Cascio8, Jennifer Dunlap8, Yiyi Chen1, Catherine Degnin1, Julia E Maxson1, Cristina E Tognon1, Tara Macey1, Brian J Druker1,9, Jeffrey W Tyner1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Colony-stimulating factor-3 receptor (CSF3R)-T618I is a recurrent activating mutation in chronic neutrophilic leukemia (CNL) and to a lesser extent in atypical chronic myeloid leukemia (aCML) resulting in constitutive JAK-STAT signaling. We sought to evaluate safety and efficacy of the JAK1/2 inhibitor ruxolitinib in patients with CNL and aCML, irrespective of CSF3R mutation status.
METHODS: We conducted a phase II study of ruxolitinib in 44 patients (21 CNL and 23 aCML). The primary end point was overall hematologic response rate (ORR) by the end of 6 continuous 28-day cycles for the first 25 patients enrolled. We considered a response as either partial (PR) or complete response (CR). We expanded accrual to 44 patients to increase our ability to evaluate secondary end points, including grade ≥ 3 adverse events, spleen volume, symptom assessment, genetic correlates of response, and 2-year survival.
RESULTS: ORR was 32% for the first 25 enrolled patients (8 PR [7 CNL and 1 aCML]). In the larger cohort of 44 patients, 35% had a response (11 PR [9 CNL and 2 aCML] and 4 CR [CNL]), and 50% had oncogenic CSF3R mutations. The mean absolute allele burden reduction of CSF3R-T618I after 6 cycles was greatest in the CR group, compared with the PR and no response groups. The most common cause of death is due to disease progression. Grade ≥ 3 anemia and thrombocytopenia were observed in 34% and 14% of patients, respectively. No serious adverse events attributed to ruxolitinib were observed.
CONCLUSION: Ruxolitinib was well tolerated and demonstrated an estimated response rate of 32%. Patients with a diagnosis of CNL and/or harboring CSF3R-T618I were most likely to respond.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31880950      PMCID: PMC7106977          DOI: 10.1200/JCO.19.00895

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  39 in total

1.  Three-year efficacy, safety, and survival findings from COMFORT-II, a phase 3 study comparing ruxolitinib with best available therapy for myelofibrosis.

Authors:  Francisco Cervantes; Alessandro M Vannucchi; Jean-Jacques Kiladjian; Haifa Kathrin Al-Ali; Andres Sirulnik; Viktoriya Stalbovskaya; Mari McQuitty; Deborah S Hunter; Richard S Levy; Francesco Passamonti; Tiziano Barbui; Giovanni Barosi; Claire N Harrison; Laurent Knoops; Heinz Gisslinger
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 22.113

2.  Changes in allele frequencies of CSF3R and SETBP1 mutations and evidence of clonal evolution in a chronic neutrophilic leukemia patient treated with ruxolitinib.

Authors:  Zohra Nooruddin; Nicholas Miltgen; Qi Wei; Jeffrey Schowinsky; Zengang Pan; Jennifer Tobin; Enkhtsetseg Purev; Jonathan A Gutman; William Robinson; Daniel A Pollyea
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 9.941

3.  A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of ruxolitinib for myelofibrosis.

Authors:  Srdan Verstovsek; Ruben A Mesa; Jason Gotlib; Richard S Levy; Vikas Gupta; John F DiPersio; John V Catalano; Michael Deininger; Carole Miller; Richard T Silver; Moshe Talpaz; Elliott F Winton; Jimmie H Harvey; Murat O Arcasoy; Elizabeth Hexner; Roger M Lyons; Ronald Paquette; Azra Raza; Kris Vaddi; Susan Erickson-Viitanen; Iphigenia L Koumenis; William Sun; Victor Sandor; Hagop M Kantarjian
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Outcome of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with atypical chronic myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  M Koldehoff; D W Beelen; R Trenschel; N K Steckel; R Peceny; M Ditschkowski; H Ottinger; A H Elmaagacli
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 5.483

5.  Phase 2 study of lenalidomide in transfusion-dependent, low-risk, and intermediate-1 risk myelodysplastic syndromes with karyotypes other than deletion 5q.

Authors:  Azra Raza; James A Reeves; Eric J Feldman; Gordon W Dewald; John M Bennett; H Joachim Deeg; Luke Dreisbach; Charles A Schiffer; Richard M Stone; Peter L Greenberg; Peter T Curtin; Virginia M Klimek; Jamile M Shammo; Deborah Thomas; Robert D Knight; Michele Schmidt; Kenton Wride; Jerome B Zeldis; Alan F List
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2007-09-24       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 6.  The 2016 revision to the World Health Organization classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia.

Authors:  Daniel A Arber; Attilio Orazi; Robert Hasserjian; Jürgen Thiele; Michael J Borowitz; Michelle M Le Beau; Clara D Bloomfield; Mario Cazzola; James W Vardiman
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 22.113

7.  Somatic SETBP1 mutations in myeloid malignancies.

Authors:  Hideki Makishima; Kenichi Yoshida; Nhu Nguyen; Bartlomiej Przychodzen; Masashi Sanada; Yusuke Okuno; Kwok Peng Ng; Kristbjorn O Gudmundsson; Bandana A Vishwakarma; Andres Jerez; Ines Gomez-Segui; Mariko Takahashi; Yuichi Shiraishi; Yasunobu Nagata; Kathryn Guinta; Hiraku Mori; Mikkael A Sekeres; Kenichi Chiba; Hiroko Tanaka; Hideki Muramatsu; Hirotoshi Sakaguchi; Ronald L Paquette; Michael A McDevitt; Seiji Kojima; Yogen Saunthararajah; Satoru Miyano; Lee-Yung Shih; Yang Du; Seishi Ogawa; Jaroslaw P Maciejewski
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2013-07-07       Impact factor: 38.330

8.  Enhanced MAPK signaling is essential for CSF3R-induced leukemia.

Authors:  S Rohrabaugh; M Kesarwani; Z Kincaid; E Huber; J Leddonne; Z Siddiqui; Y Khalifa; K Komurov; H L Grimes; M Azam
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2016-12-27       Impact factor: 11.528

9.  CSF3R-mutated chronic neutrophilic leukemia: long-term outcome in 19 consecutive patients and risk model for survival.

Authors:  Natasha Szuber; Christy M Finke; Terra L Lasho; Michelle A Elliott; Curtis A Hanson; Animesh Pardanani; Ayalew Tefferi
Journal:  Blood Cancer J       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 11.037

Review 10.  Targeting few to help hundreds: JAK, MAPK and ROCK pathways as druggable targets in atypical chronic myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Stefania Rocca; Giovanna Carrà; Pietro Poggio; Alessandro Morotti; Mara Brancaccio
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 27.401

View more
  19 in total

1.  B-lymphoblastic leukemia arising in a patient with chronic neutrophilic leukemia.

Authors:  Craig S Boddy; Brent T Tan; Joseph Aoki
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2020-11-10

2.  Tumor Genomic Profiling and Ex Vivo Drug Sensitivity Testing for Pediatric Leukemia and Lymphoma Patients.

Authors:  Aubrie Eaton; Victor Wong; Deborah Schiff; Eric Anderson; Hilda Ding; Edmund V Capparelli; Deb Determan; Dennis John Kuo
Journal:  J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2022-02-09

Review 3.  Small molecule inhibitors targeting the cancers.

Authors:  Gui-Hong Liu; Tao Chen; Xin Zhang; Xue-Lei Ma; Hua-Shan Shi
Journal:  MedComm (2020)       Date:  2022-10-13

4.  Durable remission with ruxolitinib in a chronic neutrophilic leukemia patient harboring a truncation and membrane proximal CSF3R compound mutation.

Authors:  Anna Hinze; Jenny Rinke; Andreas Hochhaus; Thomas Ernst
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 3.673

5.  Outgrowth of a CSF3R-mutant clone drives a second myeloproliferative neoplasm in a chronic myeloid leukemia patient: a case report.

Authors:  Sarah A Carratt; Diana Brewer; Julia E Maxson; Brian J Druker; Theodore P Braun
Journal:  Biomark Res       Date:  2021-01-30

6.  Myeloid Disease with the CSF3R T618I Mutation after CLL.

Authors:  Maria Eduarda Couto; Susana Bizarro; Domingos Sousa; Nelson Domingues; Isabel Oliveira; Gabriela Martins; Manuel R Teixeira; Mário Mariz
Journal:  Case Rep Hematol       Date:  2020-12-21

7.  CSF3R T618I mutant chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) defines a proliferative CMML subtype enriched in ASXL1 mutations with adverse outcomes.

Authors:  Evandro D Bezerra; Terra L Lasho; Christy M Finke; Antoine N Saliba; Michelle A Elliott; Animesh D Pardanani; Naseema Gangat; Abhishek A Mangaonkar; Rhett P Ketterling; Ayalew Tefferi; Eric Solary; Mrinal M Patnaik
Journal:  Blood Cancer J       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 11.037

8.  Integrated Human and Murine Clinical Study Establishes Clinical Efficacy of Ruxolitinib in Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia.

Authors:  Anthony M Hunter; Hannah Newman; Amy E Dezern; David P Steensma; Sandrine Niyongere; Gail J Roboz; Qianxing Mo; Onyee Chan; Aaron Gerds; David A Sallman; William Dominguez-Viqueira; Christopher Letson; Maria E Balasis; Markus Ball; Traci Kruer; Hailing Zhang; Jeffrey E Lancet; Alan F List; Mikkael A Sekeres; Rami S Komrokji; Eric Padron
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 9.  Current Management of Chronic Neutrophilic Leukemia.

Authors:  Natasha Szuber; Ayalew Tefferi
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2021-06-07

10.  A pilot study of ruxolitinib as a front-line therapy for 12 children with secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis.

Authors:  Qing Zhang; Ang Wei; Hong-Hao Ma; Li Zhang; Hong-Yun Lian; Dong Wang; Yun-Ze Zhao; Lei Cui; Wei-Jing Li; Ying Yang; Tian-You Wang; Zhi-Gang Li; Rui Zhang
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 9.941

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.