| Literature DB >> 31880804 |
Elise Fournier1,2, Nicolas Duployez1, Benoît Ducourneau1,3, Emmanuel Raffoux4, Pascal Turlure5, Denis Caillot6, Xavier Thomas7, Alice Marceau-Renaut1, Sylvain Chantepie8, Jean-Valère Malfuson9, Emilie Lemasle10, Meyling Cheok1, Karine Celli-Lebras4, Estelle Guerin11, Christine Terré12, Juliette Lambert4, Cécile Pautas13, Hervé Dombret4, Sylvie Castaigne14, Claude Preudhomme1, Nicolas Boissel4.
Abstract
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a highly heterogeneous disease both in terms of genetic background and response to chemotherapy. Although molecular aberrations are routinely used to stratify AML patients into prognostic subgroups when receiving standard chemotherapy, the predictive value of the genetic background and co-occurring mutations remains to be assessed when using newly approved antileukemic drugs. In the present study, we retrospectively addressed the question of the predictive value of molecular events on the benefit of the addition of gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) to standard front-line chemotherapy. Using the more recent European LeukemiaNet (ELN) 2017 risk classification, we confirmed that the benefit of GO was restricted to the favorable (hazard ratio [HR], 0.54, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.30-0.98) and intermediate (HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.33-1.00) risk categories, whereas it did not influence the outcome of patients within the adverse risk subgroup (HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.61-1.43). Interestingly, the benefit of GO was significant for patients with activating signaling mutations (HR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.28-0.65), which correlated with higher CD33 expression levels. These results suggest that molecular aberrations could be critical for future differentially tailored treatments based on integrated genetic profiles that are able to predict the benefit of GO on outcome.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 31880804 DOI: 10.1182/blood.2019003471
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Blood ISSN: 0006-4971 Impact factor: 22.113