Literature DB >> 31880312

Hospice Utilization in the United States: A Prospective Cohort Study Comparing Cancer and Noncancer Deaths.

John G Cagle1, Joonyup Lee1, Katherine A Ornstein2, Jack M Guralnik3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Reliable national estimates of hospice use and underuse are needed. Additionally, drivers of hospice use in the United States are poorly understood, especially among noncancer populations. Thus the objectives of this study were to (1) provide reliable estimates of hospice use among adults in the United States; and (2) identify factors predicting use among decedents and within subsamples of cancer and noncancer deaths.
DESIGN: We conducted a prospective cohort study using the Health and Retirement Study survey. Excluding sudden deaths, we used data from the 2012 survey wave to predict hospice use in general, and then separately for cancer and non-cancer deaths.
SETTING: Study data were provided by a population-based sample of older adults from the U.S. PARTICIPANTS: We constructed a sample of 1,209 participants who died between the 2012 and 2014 survey waves. MEASUREMENTS: Hospice utilization was reported by proxy. Exposure variables included demographics, functionality (activities of daily living [ADLs]), health, depression, dementia, advance directives, nursing home residency, and cause of death.
RESULTS: Hospice utilization rate was 52.4% for the sample with 70.8% for cancer deaths and 45.4% for noncancer deaths. Fully adjusted model results showed being older (odds ratio [OR] = 1.54), less healthy (OR = .79), having dementia (OR = 1.52), and having cancer (OR = 5.47) were linked to greater odds of receiving hospice. Among cancer deaths, being older (OR = 1.64) and female (OR = 2.54) were the only predictors of hospice use. Among noncancer deaths, increased age (OR = 1.58), more education (OR = 1.56), being widowed (OR = 1.55), needing help with ADLs (OR = 1.13), and poor health (OR = .77) were associated with hospice utilization.
CONCLUSION: Findings suggest hospice remains underutilized, especially among individuals with noncancer illness. Extrapolating results to the US population, we estimate that annually nearly a million individuals who are likely eligible for hospice die without its services. Most (84%) of these decedents have a noncancer condition. Interventions are needed to increase appropriate hospice utilization, particularly in noncancer care settings. J Am Geriatr Soc 68:783-793, 2020.
© 2019 The American Geriatrics Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Health and Retirement Study; end-of-life care; healthcare utilization; hospice

Year:  2019        PMID: 31880312     DOI: 10.1111/jgs.16294

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc        ISSN: 0002-8614            Impact factor:   5.562


  6 in total

1.  Subjective life expectancy and associated factors among cancer survivors over 45 years old: evidence from the CHARLS.

Authors:  Zhishui Chen; Dawei Zhu; Xingyu Hu; Guangying Gao
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Racial and Ethnic Differences in Hospice Use and Hospitalizations at End-of-Life Among Medicare Beneficiaries With Dementia.

Authors:  Pei-Jung Lin; Yingying Zhu; Natalia Olchanski; Joshua T Cohen; Peter J Neumann; Jessica D Faul; Howard M Fillit; Karen M Freund
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-06-01

3.  Patient Factors Associated with Different Hospice Programs in Korea: Analyzing Healthcare Big Data.

Authors:  Young-Taek Park; Daekyun Kim; Su-Jin Koh; Yeon Sook Kim; Sang Mi Kim
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-01-29       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 4.  Palliative care models for patients living with advanced cancer: a narrative review for the emergency department clinician.

Authors:  Corita R Grudzen; Paige C Barker; Jason J Bischof; Allison M Cuthel; Eric D Isaacs; Lauren T Southerland; Rebecca L Yamarik
Journal:  Emerg Cancer Care       Date:  2022-08-05

Review 5.  Psychological problems among cancer patients in relation to healthcare and societal costs: A systematic review.

Authors:  Florie E Van Beek; Lonneke M A Wijnhoven; Karen Holtmaat; José A E Custers; Judith B Prins; Irma M Verdonck-de Leeuw; Femke Jansen
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 3.955

6.  Factors of Hospitals Associated With an Independent Hospice Care Unit: A Quantitative Empirical Study.

Authors:  Young-Taek Park; Hyejung Chang; Hyunchul Shin
Journal:  J Hosp Palliat Nurs       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 1.918

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.