Literature DB >> 31879864

Response of Wild Spotted Wing Drosophila (Drosophila suzukii) to Microbial Volatiles.

Eduardo Bueno1, Kyle R Martin2, Robert A Raguso3, John G Mcmullen1, Stephen P Hesler4, Greg M Loeb4, Angela E Douglas5,6.   

Abstract

The olfactory cues used by various animals to detect and identify food items often include volatile organic compounds (VOCs) produced by food-associated microorganisms. Microbial VOCs have potential as lures to trap animal pests, including insect crop pests. This study investigated microorganisms whose VOCs are attractive to natural populations of the spotted wing drosophila (SWD), an invasive insect pest of ripening fruits. The microorganisms readily cultured from wild SWD and SWD-infested fruits included yeasts, especially Hanseniaspora species, and various bacteria, including Proteobacteria (especially Acetobacteraceae and Enterobacteriaceae) and Actinobacteria. Traps in a raspberry planting that were baited with cultures of Hanseniaspora uvarum, H. opuntiae and the commercial lure Scentry trapped relatively high numbers of both SWD and non-target drosophilids. The VOCs associated with these baits were dominated by ethyl acetate and, for yeasts, other esters. By contrast, Gluconobacter species (Acetobacteraceae), whose VOCs were dominated by acetic acid and acetoin and lacked detectable ethyl acetate, trapped 60-75% fewer SWD but with very high selectivity for SWD. VOCs of two other taxa tested, the yeast Pichia sp. and Curtobacterium sp. (Actinobacteria), trapped very few SWD or other insects. Our demonstration of among-microbial variation in VOCs and their attractiveness to SWD and non-pest insects under field conditions provides the basis for improved design of lures for SWD management. Further research is required to establish how different microbial VOC profiles may function as reliable cues of habitat suitability for fly feeding and oviposition, and how this variation maps onto among-insect species differences in habitat preference.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acetobacteraceae; Attract-and-kill; Drosophila suzukii; Hanseniaspora; Microbial volatiles; Spotted wing Drosophila

Year:  2019        PMID: 31879864     DOI: 10.1007/s10886-019-01139-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Ecol        ISSN: 0098-0331            Impact factor:   2.626


  9 in total

1.  Mutualism has its limits: consequences of asymmetric interactions between a well-defended plant and its herbivorous pollinator.

Authors:  Maria Sol Balbuena; Geoffrey T Broadhead; Ajinkya Dahake; Emily Barnett; Melissa Vergara; Krissa A Skogen; Tania Jogesh; Robert A Raguso
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 6.671

2.  Microbial Volatile Organic Compounds from Tempered and Incubated Grain Mediate Attraction by a Primary but Not Secondary Stored Product Insect Pest in Wheat.

Authors:  Taylor Van Winkle; Marco Ponce; Hannah Quellhorst; Alexander Bruce; Chloe E Albin; Tania N Kim; Kun Yan Zhu; William R Morrison
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2021-09-20       Impact factor: 2.793

3.  How gut microbiome interactions affect nutritional traits of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  John G McMullen; Grace Peters-Schulze; Jingwei Cai; Andrew D Patterson; Angela E Douglas
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 4.  Culturable Yeasts as Biofertilizers and Biopesticides for a Sustainable Agriculture: A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  María Hernández-Fernández; Gustavo Cordero-Bueso; Marina Ruiz-Muñoz; Jesús M Cantoral
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-21

5.  Social signals mediate oviposition site selection in Drosophila suzukii.

Authors:  Johanna E Elsensohn; Marwa F K Aly; Coby Schal; Hannah J Burrack
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Liquid Baits with Oenococcus oeni Increase Captures of Drosophila suzukii.

Authors:  Gordana Ðurović; Amani Alawamleh; Silvia Carlin; Giuseppe Maddalena; Raffaele Guzzon; Valerio Mazzoni; Daniel T Dalton; Vaughn M Walton; David M Suckling; Ruth C Butler; Sergio Angeli; Antonio De Cristofaro; Gianfranco Anfora
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 2.769

7.  The relative abundances of yeasts attractive to Drosophila suzukii differ between fruit types and are greatest on raspberries.

Authors:  Rory Jones; Michelle T Fountain; Nadia A Andreani; Catrin S Günther; Matthew R Goddard
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 4.996

8.  The use of light spectrum blocking films to reduce populations of Drosophila suzukii Matsumura in fruit crops.

Authors:  Michelle T Fountain; Amir Badiee; Sebastian Hemer; Alvaro Delgado; Michael Mangan; Colin Dowding; Frederick Davis; Simon Pearson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Mass Trapping Drosophila suzukii, What Would It Take? A Two-Year Field Study on Trap Interference.

Authors:  Rik Clymans; Vincent Van Kerckvoorde; Tom Thys; Patrick De Clercq; Dany Bylemans; Tim Beliën
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 2.769

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.