Literature DB >> 31879828

iFuse Implant System for Treating Chronic Sacroiliac Joint Pain: A NICE Medical Technology Guidance.

Megan Dale1, James Evans2, Kimberley Carter3, Susan O'Connell4, Helen Morgan2, Grace Carolan-Rees4.   

Abstract

Treatment and management of sacroiliac joint pain is often non-surgical, involving packages of care that can include analgesics, physiotherapy, corticosteroid injections and radiofrequency ablation. Surgical intervention is considered when patients no longer respond to conservative management. The iFuse Implant System is placed across the sacroiliac joint using minimally invasive surgery, stabilising the joint and correcting any misalignment or weakness that can cause chronic pain. The iFuse system was evaluated in 2018 by the UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) as part of the Medical Technologies Evaluation Programme (MTEP). Clinical evidence for iFuse suggests improved pain, Oswestry disability index (ODI) and quality of life compared to non-surgical management. The company (SI-Bone®) submitted two cost models indicating that iFuse was cost saving compared with open surgery and non-surgical management. Clinicians advised that non-surgical management was the most appropriate comparator and Cedar (a health technology research centre) made changes to the model to test the impact of higher acquisition and procedure costs. Cedar found iFuse to be cost incurring by approximately £560 per patient at 7 years. During the consultation period, the company reduced the cost of some iFuse consumables, and Cedar extended the time horizon to test the assumption that iFuse would become cost saving over time. These changes indicated that iFuse becomes cost saving at 8 years (approximately £129 per patient), after which the cost saving continues to increase. NICE published guidance in October 2018 recommending that the case for adoption of the iFuse system in the UK National Health Service (NHS) was supported by the evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31879828     DOI: 10.1007/s40258-019-00539-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy        ISSN: 1175-5652            Impact factor:   2.561


  5 in total

Review 1.  Management of Sacroiliac Joint Pain.

Authors:  Gary L Schmidt; Amit K Bhandutia; Daniel T Altman
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 3.020

Review 2.  Diagnosing Sacroiliac Joint Pain.

Authors:  Dinesh P Thawrani; Steven S Agabegi; Ferhan Asghar
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 3.020

Review 3.  Sacroiliac joint pain: a comprehensive review of epidemiology, diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  Steven P Cohen; Yian Chen; Nathan J Neufeld
Journal:  Expert Rev Neurother       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.618

Review 4.  Sacroiliac Joint Pain and Its Treatment.

Authors:  Ralph F Rashbaum; Donna D Ohnmeiss; Emily M Lindley; Scott H Kitchel; Vikas V Patel
Journal:  Clin Spine Surg       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.876

Review 5.  European guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pelvic girdle pain.

Authors:  Andry Vleeming; Hanne B Albert; Hans Christian Ostgaard; Bengt Sturesson; Britt Stuge
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-02-08       Impact factor: 3.134

  5 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  Beyond the pedicle screw-a patent review.

Authors:  Esther P de Kater; Aimée Sakes; Erik Edström; Adrian Elmi-Terander; Gerald Kraan; Paul Breedveld
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 2.721

2.  Sacroiliac joint fusion in patients with Ehlers Danlos Syndrome: A case series.

Authors:  Iris Beijk; Rob Knoef; Arie van Vugt; Wiebe Verra; Jorm Nellensteijn
Journal:  N Am Spine Soc J       Date:  2021-09-29
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.