| Literature DB >> 31879670 |
Elham Jahanifard1,2, Ahmad Ali Hanafi-Bojd1, Hossein Nasiri3, Hamid Reza Matinfar4, Zabihollah Charrahy5, Mohammad Reza Abai1, Mohammad Reza Yaghoobi-Ershadi1, Amir Ahmad Akhavan1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cutaneous leishmaniasis due to Leishmania major is an important public health problem in the world. Khuzestan Province is one of the main foci of zoonotic cutaneous leishmaniasis (ZCL) in the southwest of Iran. We aimed to predict the spatial distribution of the vector and reservoir(s) of ZCL using decision-making tool and to prepare risk map of the disease using integrative GIS, RS and AHP methods in endemic foci in Shush (plain area) and Khorramshahr (coastal area) counties of Khuzestan Province, southern Iran from Mar 2012 to Jan 2013.Entities:
Keywords: Cutaneous leishmaniasis; Decision model; Iran; Risk map
Year: 2019 PMID: 31879670 PMCID: PMC6928385
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Arthropod Borne Dis ISSN: 2322-1984 Impact factor: 1.198
Fig. 1.Map of study areas in Khuzestan Province, southern Iran
Fundamental scale to pairwise comparison (44)
| Equal importance (two activities contribute to the objective) | |
| Moderate importance(experience and judgment slightly favor one activity over another) | |
| Strong importance (Experience and judgment strongly favor one activity over another) | |
| Very strong importance (an activity is favored very strongly over another) | |
| Extreme importance (the evidence favoring one activity over another is of the highest possible order of affirmation) | |
| Intermediate values between the two adjacent judgments (when comparison is needed) |
Comparison matrix of the criteria affecting the presence probability of the main vector (Phlebotomus papatasi)
| 1 | 2.605 | 3.728 | 5.194 | 5.194 | 4.384 | 2.702 | 5.674 | 4.02 | 2.477 | 1.431 | 3.347 | 3.126 | |
| - | 1 | 2.724 | 2.569 | 3.987 | 4.555 | 2.569 | 4.241 | 3.758 | 2.239 | 1.037 | 3.936 | 4.02 | |
| - | - | 1 | 3.728 | 3.987 | 4.416 | 1.393 | 4.241 | 1.644 | 1.246 | 0.591 | 3.882 | 3.707 | |
| - | - | - | 1 | 2.537 | 3.017 | 0.903 | 4.004 | 1.719 | 1.673 | 0.684 | 3.022 | 3.898 | |
| - | - | - | - | 1 | 2.993 | 1.059 | 3.005 | 1.719 | 1.149 | 0.591 | 2.237 | 3.594 | |
| - | - | - | - | - | 1 | 0.506 | 1.516 | 0.422 | 0.384 | 0.476 | 0.974 | 1.105 | |
| - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | 3.692 | 2.016 | 2.477 | 0.728 | 3.63 | 3.845 | |
| - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | 0.833 | 1.099 | 0.459 | 2.112 | 2.091 | |
| - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | 1.262 | 0.59 | 2.605 | 2.713 | |
| - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | 2 | 2.569 | 3.594 | |
| - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | 2.085 | 2.876 | |
| - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | 0.994 | |
| - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 |
Comparison matrix of the criteria affecting the presence probability of main the reservoirs (Tatera indica and Nesokia indica)
| 1 | 2.569 | 3.201 | 0.762 | 1.695 | 2.424 | 2.268 | 1.516 | 3.245 | 0.718 | 0.693 | 2.713 | 0.944 | |
| 1 | 1.585 | 0.703 | 0.725 | 1.461 | 1.398 | 1.431 | 1.741 | 0.578 | 0.509 | 1.719 | 0.616 | ||
| - | - | 1 | 0.520 | 1.059 | 0.922 | 1.563 | 1.246 | 1.888 | 0.328 | 0.509 | 1.046 | 0.631 | |
| - | - | - | 1 | 3.273 | 3.277 | 4.258 | 5.357 | 5.123 | 1.431 | 2.667 | 4.324 | 2.954 | |
| - | - | - | - | 1 | 1.974 | 1.585 | 3.438 | 3.227 | 0.544 | 0.474 | 1.572 | 0.668 | |
| - | - | - | - | - | 1 | 1.657 | 2.512 | 2.268 | 0.564 | 0.552 | 1.552 | 0.725 | |
| - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | 0.833 | 1.217 | 0.343 | 0.328 | 1 | 0.484 | |
| - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | 1.38 | 0.333 | 0.340 | 1.585 | 0.525 | |
| - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | 0.476 | 0.527 | 1.32 | 0.668 | |
| - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | 2.29 | 4.891 | 3.129 | |
| - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | 5.619 | 3.064 | ||
| - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | 0.53 | |
| - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 |
The weight of each criterion affecting the presence of reservoirs and vector derived from AHP technique
| 0.207 | 0.148 | 0.11 | 0.077 | 0.06 | 0.03 | 0.08 | 0.034 | 0.051 | 0.055 | 0.095 | 0.027 | 0.026 | - | 1 | |
| 0.105 | 0.063 | 0.052 | 0.174 | 0.058 | 0.038 | 0.072 | 0.036 | 0.117 | 0.139 | - | 0.034 | 0.072 | 0.04 | 1 |
Fig. 2.Presence probability maps of (a) reservoir and (b) vector in Shush County, Khuzestan Province of Iran, 2014
Fig. 3.Presence probability maps of (a) reservoir and (b) vector in Khorramshahr County, Khuzestan Province of Iran, 2014
Fig. 4.Risk map of zoonotic cutaneous leishmaniasis in (a) Khorramshahr and (b) Shush Counties, Khuzestan Province of Iran, 2014
Fig. 5.Accuracy of distribution probability maps of (a) reservoir and (b) vector based on analytic hierarchy process model in Shush County, Khuzestan Province of Iran, 2014
Fig. 6.Accuracy of distribution probability maps of (a) reservoir and (b) vector based on analytic hierarchy process model in Khorramshahr County, Khuzestan Province of Iran, 2014