| Literature DB >> 31879284 |
Peichuan Zhang1,2, Yuying Zhai1, James Cregg1, Kenny Kean-Hooi Ang3, Michelle Arkin3, Cynthia Kenyon4,2.
Abstract
Increased resistance to environmental stress at the cellular level is correlated with the longevity of long-lived mutants and wild-animal species. Moreover, in experimental organisms, screens for increased stress resistance have yielded mutants that are long-lived. To find entry points for small molecules that might extend healthy longevity in humans, we screened ∼100,000 small molecules in a human primary-fibroblast cell line and identified a set that increased oxidative-stress resistance. Some of the hits fell into structurally related chemical groups, suggesting that they may act on common targets. Two small molecules increased C. elegans' stress resistance, and at least 9 extended their lifespan by ∼10-50%. We further evaluated a chalcone that produced relatively large effects on lifespan and were able to implicate the activity of two, stress-response regulators, NRF2/skn-1 and SESN/sesn-1, in its mechanism of action. Our findings suggest that screening for increased stress resistance in human cells can enrich for compounds with promising pro-longevity effects. Further characterization of these compounds may reveal new ways to extend healthy human lifespan.Entities:
Keywords: C. elegans; NRF2; Small molecule screen; WI-38; aging; oxidative stress; stress resistance
Year: 2020 PMID: 31879284 PMCID: PMC7003076 DOI: 10.1534/g3.119.400618
Source DB: PubMed Journal: G3 (Bethesda) ISSN: 2160-1836 Impact factor: 3.154
Figure 1Summary of the small-molecule screen hits. A cell viability assay was performed for each of 104,121 compounds analyzed, by measuring ATP content, for WI-38 cells that were pre-incubated with 10 μM small molecules overnight and then treated with H2O2 for 3 hr. 209 primary hits were identified and subjected to a series of retests to eliminate false positives and ROS scavengers to yield the top 61 selected hits. Of these, a core set of 32 small molecules were validated and further analyzed in cells and in worms. Many molecules showed cell toxicity and potential DNA-damaging effects, and 4 top non-toxic molecules showing no liabilities were analyzed for their effects on gene expression in WI-38 cells.
Figure 2Summary of the top 61 hits that promote H2O2-resistance. Shown are normalized fold changes (ATP content) of H2O2-treated WI-38 cells, which were pre-incubated with each of the top 61 hit compounds that passed the initial selection criteria (see Figure 1). 34 molecules fell into one of nine groups (Gr-1 to 9, shown in different colors – core structures are shown) (see Supplemental Table 1 for structures). Each group comprised two or more members that share a similar core structure. In addition, we identified 27 orphan compounds. Yellow circles: PARP inhibitors (see Supplemental Figure 8).
Summary of core-set small molecule hits by their phenotypic assay scores. 32 core-set hits, including 24 that belong to 7 structural groups and 8 orphans, were analyzed in multiple longevity-correlated assays and their behaviors are shown in this table. Their relative effects in each assay are indicated (also see Supplemental Table 1). Shown first are four top hit compounds showing no obvious cell toxicity. Asterisk (*): five molecules with signature structures of pan-assay interference (PAIN) compounds. Small molecules’ relative effects in each assay are indicated by signs. Nine molecules extended C. elegans’ lifespan in at least 3 to 4 trials (++). N.D. not determined. Besides, 22 of the 54 repurchased compounds are not shown because: 1) Two orphan compounds (O19 and O25) scored negatively in all tests, even the hydrogen peroxide retest, and were discarded. 2) For three molecules (Gr-6A, O12 and O17), their masses did not match the predicted values by LC-MS analysis. 3) The other seventeen, including all group-2 compounds that were confirmed to be PARP inhibitors, increased ATP content upon stress (and potentially are still interesting), yet did not score positively for the cell death-imaging assay.
| Cell-based assays | Liabilities | |||||||||
| ID | H2O2-resistant | CdCl2-resistant | Potential FOXO3 Activation (by qPCR assay) | Potential NRF2 Activation (by qPCR assay) | mTOR down-regulation | Protection from Huntington's poly-Q toxicity | H2O2-resistance in | Lifespan-extending scores in | Potential DNA-damaging | Potential toxicity based on ATP and confluency assays |
| Top, non-toxic molecules (4) | ||||||||||
| Gr-4D | yes | ++ | no | ++ | no | no | + | +++ | no | no |
| Gr-5A | yes | ++ | no | + | no | no | + | no | no | no |
| Gr-5D | yes | no | no | + | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| O10 | yes | ++ | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| Others with potential liability (* potential PAINS, shown at the bottom) (28) | ||||||||||
| Gr-1A | yes | +/? | no | no | no | + | + | no | + | no |
| Gr-1B | yes | ++ | no | no | no | no | + | + | + or no | no |
| Gr-1C | yes | ++ | no | no | no | + | no | + | + | no |
| Gr-1D | yes | ++ | no | no | no | no | no | + | + | no |
| Gr-1E | yes | ++ | no | no | no | no | no | ++ | + | + |
| Gr-1F | yes | ++ | no | no | no | no | no | + | + | + |
| Gr-1G | yes | ++ | no | no | no | no | no | + | + | + |
| Gr-3A | yes | ++ | no | no | no | no | no | ++ | + | no |
| Gr-3B | yes | ++ | no | no | no | no | + | ++ | + | + |
| Gr-3C | yes | no | no | no | no | no | no | ++ | + | + |
| Gr-4A | yes | ++ | no | ++ | no | no | no | no | + or no | + |
| Gr-4B | yes | ++ | no | ++ | no | no | no | + | no | + |
| Gr-4C | yes | no | no | ++ | no | no | no | no | no | + |
| Gr-5B | yes | no | no | + | no | no | no | no | + or no | no |
| Gr-6B | yes | ++ | no | + | no | + | no | no | + or no | + |
| Gr-7A | yes | N.D. | + | no | + | no | ++ | ++ | + | + |
| Gr-7B | yes | N.D. | no | no | + | no | + | no | + | + |
| Gr-7C | yes | no | + | + | + | + | no | no | + or no | + |
| O11 | yes | ++ | no | no | no | no | + | + | + or no | + |
| O13 | yes | +/? | no | + | no | no | + | +++ | + or no | + |
| O18 | yes | no | no | + | no | no | no | + | + or no | + |
| O20 | yes | ++ | no | + | no | no | no | + | + or no | no |
| O27 | yes | ++ | no | no | + | no | no | − | + | + |
| O6 (* non-toxic) | yes | ++ | no | + | no | no | no | + | no | N.D. |
| O21 (*) | yes | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | + | + |
| Gr-6C (*) | yes | no | no | no | no | no | no | ++ | + | + |
| Gr-9A (*) | yes | N.D. | no | + | no | no | ++ | + | + or no | + |
| Gr-9B (*) | yes | N.D. | + | no | no | no | + | ++ | + or no | + |
Figure 4Extension of C. elegans’ lifespan by small molecules. Small molecules were analyzed for their ability to extend the lifespan of C. elegans. Two small molecules (Gr-4D, without cell toxicity; O13, with cell toxicity) that consistently extended lifespan in multiple independent assays are shown. A) Wild-type animals, grown in liquid, with FUDR to block progeny production, 20°C. Control, 21.2 ± 0.5 (mean ± SEM in days), n = 77/81 (observed/total); Gr-4D-treated, 31.9 ± 1.1 (50.5% increase), n = 41/41, P < 0.0001 (log-rank test); O13-treated, 28.1 ± 1.1 (32.5% increase), n = 36/36, P < 0.0001. B) Temperature-sensitive sterile mutant animals, grown on plates, without FUDR, 25°C then shifted to room temperature (∼22°C) as adults. Control, 18.4 ± 0.4, n = 67/80; Gr-4D-treated, 22.5 ± 0.4 (22.2% increase), n = 74/95, P < 0.0001 (log-rank test); O13-treated, 23.4 ± 0.4 (27.2% increase), n = 72/76, P < 0.0001 (see Supplemental Table 8 for details). C) The lifespan extension produced by Gr-4D requires . RNAi-sensitive mutants were fed with control vector or RNAi bacteria and treated with Gr-4D (from two different vendors, CB = ChemBridge, MP = MolPort) at multiple doses. In parallel, RNAi-treated animals were collected for RT-qPCR analysis, which indicated that mRNA level was reduced by ∼80% in these animals (normalized to , n = 4 each; one-way ANOVA, followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison, P < 0.0001). In this experiment, Gr-4D extended lifespan of control animals by ∼15–20%. D) The lifespan extension produced by Gr-4D requires . In this experiment, lower doses but not a high dose of Gr-4D extended lifespan of wild type by ∼10–17%. (The reason for this discrepancy was unclear). Log-rank test: *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; n.s., not significant (see Supplemental Table 8 for details of lifespan data).
Figure 3Effects of Gr-4D on gene expression of WI-38 cells. A) Pearson’s correlation between global transcriptional profiles for cells treated with Gr-4D. Shown are the normalized gene expression matrices (transcripts per million, TPM values) of the 8,000 genes detected in every RNA-seq sample, grouped by unsupervised clustering using Pearson correlation coefficient as a distance metric. Note that most DMSO (0.1%) controls were clustered together on the tree, as were the no-DMSO mock controls or samples treated with Gr-4D (2.5 μM) from two different vendors (CB, ChemBridge; MP, MolPort). This correlation was observed also in the principal component analysis (PCA), by projecting two major components (PC1 and PC3), which explained 7.25% and 5.15% variation of global gene expression, respectively. B) Volcano plot showing effects of Gr-4D on gene expression. Shown are the normalized expression level (X axis) and FDR-adjusted significance (Y axis) for one Gr-4D (from MolPort). Each dot represents a gene that was differentially expressed in WI-38 cells upon treatment with Gr-4D (see Supplemental Table 5). C) Pathway analysis indicating effects of Gr-4D on certain pathways. Shown are the top pathways affected (by PANTHER analysis of 550 significant genes, with FDR-adjust q value of overlap with the known pathway genes < 0.05; or by Enrichr-KEGG pathway analysis, with a ranking score combining both FDR and z score > 10) (see Supplemental Table 6A).