Literature DB >> 31879057

Vascular assessment in venous leg ulcer diagnostics and management in Australian primary care: Clinician experiences.

Carolina Weller1, Catelyn Richards2, Louise Turnour2, Sally Green3, Victoria Team2.   

Abstract

AIM: In this article, we focus on primary health clinicians' experiences of vascular assessment in venous leg ulcer (VLU) diagnostics and management, including ankle brachial pressure index (ABPI) measurements using Doppler ultrasonography.
METHODS: We conducted semi-structured face-to-face and telephone interviews with general practitioners [15] and practice nurses [20] from primary health care settings in Australia. Twenty-one participants were recruited from practices located in Melbourne metropolitan settings and 14 from rural Victoria. We used the theory driven thematic analysis as a method of data analysis. The Theoretical Domains Framework informed this analysis.
RESULTS: Five domains were identified as relevant, including Environmental Context and Resources, Motivation and Goals, Skills, Knowledge, and Beliefs about Capabilities. Although the Australian and New Zealand clinical practice guideline for prevention and management of venous leg ulcers recommend that vascular assessment is conducted for all patients with suspected VLUs, findings from our study indicate vascular assessments are not routinely performed in many primary care settings. Our study also found that a lack of awareness of clinical practice guidelines among clinicians might be one of the main issues for not following the latest clinical recommendations for vascular assessment in venous leg ulcer diagnostics and wound management practice.
CONCLUSION: We recommend development of theory-informed interventions for clinicians in primary health care settings to optimise VLU management and healing outcomes for patients with VLUs. Implementation and evaluation of these interventions have the potential to reduce the evidence-practice gap in VLU management and optimise healing outcomes.
Copyright © 2019 Tissue Viability Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31879057     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtv.2019.12.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Tissue Viability        ISSN: 0965-206X            Impact factor:   2.932


  3 in total

1.  Rationale for participation in venous leg ulcer clinical research: Patient interview study.

Authors:  Carolina D Weller; Catelyn Richards; Louise Turnour; Victoria Team
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  Primary Care Wound Clinics: A Qualitative Descriptive Study of Patient Experiences in Community Pharmacies.

Authors:  Lusi Sheehan; Sheldon Dias; Michael Joseph; Sahil Mungroo; Jake Pantinople; Kenneth Lee
Journal:  Pharmacy (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-17

3.  Patient Explanation of Adherence and Non-Adherence to Venous Leg Ulcer Treatment: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Carolina D Weller; Catelyn Richards; Louise Turnour; Victoria Team
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 5.810

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.