| Literature DB >> 31878929 |
B Shantharam Baliga1, Animesh Jain1, Naren Koduvattat2, B G Prakash Kumar3, Manu Kumar4, Arun Kumar5, Susanta K Ghosh6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Under-reporting, delayed diagnosis, incomplete treatment and inadequate vector management are few among many factors responsible for uninterrupted transmission of malaria in India. Information technology (IT) and mobile apps can be utilized effectively to overcome these hurdles. Indigenously developed digital handheld geographic information system (GIS)-tagged Android-based tablets (TABs) has been designed especially for implementation of digitization protocol. This has changed the effectiveness of malaria surveillance and intervention strategies in a malaria endemic area of Mangaluru city, Karnataka, India.Entities:
Keywords: Digitization; GIS; Incidence-centric; Information technology; Malaria; Malaria elimination; Mangaluru; Mobile app; Smart surveillance; Software; TABs
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31878929 PMCID: PMC6933888 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-019-3080-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Malar J ISSN: 1475-2875 Impact factor: 2.979
Fig. 1Process and problems/issues identified in anti-malarial programme in the urban area of Mangaluru city
Fig. 2Concept, design and functioning of malaria control software (screenshots of dashboard, Multi Purpose Worker tablets and lab login screen)
Fig. 3Reporting pattern in relation to time of diagnosis from the point of diagnosis in Mangaluru city
Month wise distribution of cases, status of cases and closure of malaria cases after complete treatment and proven parasite clearance—as reported on the system
| Month | Total cases on the system (no) | Outside city administration limits (no) | Open cases (no) | Open cases in the city (no) | Cases within the limits of civic body administration (no) | Closed cases (no) | Percentage of closure (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| October 2015 | 795 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 788 | 762 | 96.70 |
| November | 1435 | 53 | 317 | 264 | 1382 | 1118 | 80.89 |
| December | 1694 | 29 | 323 | 294 | 1665 | 1371 | 82.34 |
| January, 2016 | 1144 | 23 | 243 | 220 | 1121 | 901 | 80.37 |
| February | 790 | 18 | 159 | 141 | 772 | 631 | 81.73 |
| March | 596 | 50 | 131 | 180 | 546 | 465 | 85.10 |
| April | 624 | 146 | 172 | 26 | 478 | 452 | 94.56 |
| May | 609 | 120 | 133 | 13 | 489 | 476 | 97.34 |
| June | 1562 | 334 | 418 | 84 | 1228 | 1144 | 93.15 |
| July | 2563 | 437 | 630 | 193 | 2126 | 1933 | 90.92 |
| August | 2421 | 433 | 445 | 12 | 1998 | 1976 | 98.89 |
| September, 2016 | 1289 | 247 | 248 | 1 | 1042 | 1041 | 99.90 |
| Years total | 15,522 | 1897 | 3226 | 1428 | 13,635a | 11,229 | 89.27 |
| October 2016 | 907 | 164 | 167 | 3 | 743 | 740 | 99.59 |
| November | 828 | 150 | 149 | 1 | 678 | 678 | 100.00 |
| December | 553 | 76 | 74 | 0 | 477 | 477 | 100.00 |
| January, 2017 | 471 | 56 | 57 | 1 | 415 | 414 | 99.75 |
| February | 410 | 56 | 56 | 0 | 354 | 354 | 100.00 |
| March | 358 | 52 | 57 | 0 | 306 | 301 | 98.36 |
| April | 442 | 62 | 66 | 4 | 380 | 376 | 98.90 |
| May | 453 | 82 | 82 | 0 | 371 | 371 | 100.00 |
| June | 848 | 135 | 145 | 10 | 713 | 703 | 98.58 |
| July | 1542 | 279 | 314 | 35 | 1263 | 1210 | 95.80 |
| August | 1771 | 354 | 418 | 64 | 1417 | 1353 | 95.48 |
| September, 2017 | 1146 | 235 | 313 | 78 | 911 | 833 | 91.43 |
| Years total | 9729 | 1701 | 1898 | 196 | 8028a | 7810 | 98.16 |
aOriginal data from the software includes dual entries does not reflect actual incidence within the city
Malaria cases reported in the city of Mangaluru in the pre- during and post digitization years
| Activities | Pre-DY | Digitization | 1st year post digitization (PDY1) | 2nd year post digitization (PDY2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of slides examined | 84,102 | 106,885 | 154,409 | 203,894 |
| Number of contact smears | a | a | 16,541 | 32,390 |
| Annual blood examination rate | 13.82 | 17.13 | 24.75 | 32.68 |
| Slide positivity rate | 11.5 | 10.36 | 8.17 | 3.65 |
| Total malarial cases (no)b | 8867 | 10,962 | 12,614 | 7640 |
| Vivax malaria (no) | 8092 | 10,196 | 11,277 | 6245 |
| Falciparum malaria (no) | 775 | 766 | 1337 | 1395 |
| Chi-square trend 164.5 | p value < 0.001 | |||
aSeparate data on blood smear collected not available from fever cases during active surveillance
bCompiled after deletions of duplicate cases and cases from outside the corporation administrative limits
Vector control activities in the city of Mangaluru in the post-digitization years
| Activities | 1st year post digitization (PDY1) | 2nd year post digitization (PDY2) |
|---|---|---|
| Number of houses visited | 1, 95,009 | 1,76,398 |
| Source reported | 11,337 | 10,545 |
| Closure of reported sources (%) | 89.2 | 98.1 |
| Number of construction sites with larval breeding | 4409 | 4098 |
| Anti larval action carried out at construction sites | 4036 (91.5%) | 3837 (93.6%) |
| Mosquitogenic houses (no) | 5527 | 5817 |
| Anti-larval action—residential | 5455 (98.5%) | 5676 (97.2%) |
Fig. 4Trends in malaria indices at Mangaluru city pre-, during and post-digitization periods