| Literature DB >> 31878890 |
Ziqi Xu1, Mingyao Li2, Zhikai Hou2, Jinhao Lyu3, Na Zhang4, Xin Lou3, Zhongrong Miao2, Ning Ma5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The relationship between intracranial vessel configuration and wall features remains poorly investigated. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the relationship between the distal and proximal anatomical configuration of basilar artery (BA) and BA vessel wall features on high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (HRMRI).Entities:
Keywords: Anatomical configuration; Atherosclerotic disease; Collateral circulation; High-resolution MRI; Vertebrobasilar artery
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31878890 PMCID: PMC6933671 DOI: 10.1186/s12880-019-0388-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Med Imaging ISSN: 1471-2342 Impact factor: 1.930
Fig. 1Example of complete and incomplete artery configuration of basilar artery. Case 1: the complete configuration of BA. a: the normal right VA with severe tortuosity of the first segment; b: normal left VA with severe stenosis of BA; c: HRMRI showing intraplaque hemorrhage of BA plaque on T1 weight imaging. Case 2: the incomplete distal configuration of BA. d: right VA angiography showing severe stenosis of BA without left PCA. e: left common carotid artery angiography showing fetal type PCA. f: HRMRI showing strong enhancement of BA plaque. Case 3: the incomplete proximal configuration of BA. G: dominant VA angiography showing severe stenosis of BA. H: CT angiography showing right VA hypoplasia. I: HRMRI showing intraplaque hemorrhage of BA plaque on T1 weight imaging
Fig. 2Flow chart of study
Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients in the complete and incomplete basilar artery configuration groups
| Variable | All patients ( | Complete configuration of BA ( | Incomplete configuration of BA ( | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age-years (SD) | 58.77 ± 9.39 | 59.18 ± 8.13 | 58.35 ± 10.74 | 0.803 |
| Body mass index-kg/m2(SD) | 26.60 ± 2.83 | 26.24 ± 2.05 | 26.96 ± 3.27 | 0.463 |
| LDL-mmol/L (SD) | 1.91 ± 0.71 | 1.77 ± 0.76 | 2.05 ± 0.65 | 0.263 |
| Male-No. (%) | 28 (82.4) | 16 (94.1) | 12 (70.6) | 0.072 |
| Hypertension-No. (%) | 28 (82.4) | 12 (70.6) | 16 (94.1) | 0.072 |
| diabetes-No. (%) | 14 (41.2) | 7 (41.2) | 7 (41.2) | 1.000 |
| dyslipidemia-No. (%) | 13 (38.2) | 3 (17.6) | 10 (58.8) | 0.013 |
| smoking-No. (%) | 25 (73.5) | 12 (70.6) | 13 (76.5) | 0.697 |
| Coronary artery disease-No. (%) | 8 (23.5) | 5 (29.4) | 3 (17.5) | 0.419 |
| Qualifying events-No. (%) | ||||
| TIA | 6 (17.6) | 5 (29.4) | 1 (5.9) | 0.072 |
| infarction | 28 (82.4) | 12 (70.6) | 16 (94.1) | 0.072 |
| Time from event to HRMRI-days (IQR) | 33 (16–52) | 33 (13–52) | 33 (23–46) | 0.462 |
| Enhancement gradea-No. (%) | ||||
| None | 10 (35.7) | 7 (70.0) | 3 (30.0) | 0.453 |
| Mild to moderate | 8 (28.6) | 5 (62.5) | 3 (37.5) | 0.903 |
| Strong | 10 (35.7) | 5 (50.0) | 5 (50.0) | 0.387 |
| Intraplaque hemorrhage-No. (%) | 7 (20.6) | 2 (28.6) | 5 (71.4) | 0.068 |
| Arterial remodeling-No. (%) | ||||
| Negative | 12 (35.3) | 11 (64.7) | 6 (35.3) | 0.486 |
| Positive | 17 (50.0) | 9 (52.9) | 8 (47.1) | |
| Distribution patterns-No. (%) | ||||
| Non-diffuse | 1 (2.9) | 0 (0) | 1 (100.0) | 0.225 |
| Diffuse | 33 (97.1) | 20 (60.6) | 13 (39.4) | |
a Data from 28 patients
Comparison of plaque features between complete and incomplete basilar artery proximal configuration
| Characteristics | Complete proximal configuration ( | Incomplete proximal configuration ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enhancement gradea-No. (%) | |||
| None | 8 (80.0) | 2 (20.0) | 0.454 |
| Mild to moderate | 5 (62.5) | 3 (33.3) | 0.508 |
| Strong | 7 (70.0) | 3 (30.0) | 0.901 |
| Intraplaque hemorrhage | 2 (28.6) | 5 (71.4) | |
| Remodeling patterns-No. (%) | |||
| Negative | 8 (66.7) | 4 (33.3) | 0.503 |
| Positive | 13 (76.5) | 4 (23.5) | 0.697 |
| Distribution patterns-No. (%) | |||
| non-diffuse | 0 (0) | 1 (100) | 0.274 |
| diffuse | 25 (75.8) | 8 (24.2) | 0.091 |
aData from 28 patients
Significant differences are highlighted in bold
Comparison of plaque features between patients with complete and incomplete distal basilar artery configuration
| Characteristics | Complete distal configuration ( | Incomplete distal configuration ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enhancement gradea-No. (%) | |||
| None | 9 (90.0) | 1 (10.0) | 0.272 |
| Mild to moderate | 7 (87.5) | 1 (12.5) | 0.466 |
| Strong | 6 (60.0) | 4 (40.0) | |
| Intraplaque hemorrhage | 5 (71.4) | 2 (28.6) | 0.724 |
| Remodeling patterns-No. (%) | |||
| Negative | 10 (83.3) | 2 (16.7) | 0.486 |
| Positive | 11 (64.7) | 6 (35.3) | 0.106 |
| Distribution patterns-No. (%) | |||
| Non-diffuse | 0 (0) | 1 (100) | 0.067 |
| diffuse | 26 (78.8) | 7 (21.2) | |
aData from 28 patients
Significant differences are highlighted in bold