Literature DB >> 31878404

Noise and sensitivity in optical coherence tomography based vibrometry.

Sangmin Kim, John S Oghalai, Brian E Applegate.   

Abstract

There is growing interest in using the exquisite phase sensitivity of optical coherence tomography (OCT) to measure the vibratory response in organ systems such as the middle and inner ear. Using frequency domain analysis, it is possible to achieve picometer sensitivity to vibration over a wide frequency band. Here we explore the limits of the frequency domain vibratory sensitivity due to additive noise and consider the implication of phase noise statistics on the estimation of vibratory amplitude and phase. Noise statistics are derived in both the Rayleigh (s/n = 0) and Normal distribution (s/n > 3) limits. These theoretical findings are explored using simulation and verified with experiments using a swept-laser system and a piezo electric element. A metric for sensitivity is proposed based on the 98% confidence interval for the Rayleigh distribution.

Year:  2019        PMID: 31878404      PMCID: PMC7046037          DOI: 10.1364/OE.27.033333

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Opt Express        ISSN: 1094-4087            Impact factor:   3.894


  20 in total

1.  Spectral-domain optical coherence phase microscopy for quantitative phase-contrast imaging.

Authors:  Chulmin Joo; Taner Akkin; Barry Cense; Boris H Park; Johannes F de Boer
Journal:  Opt Lett       Date:  2005-08-15       Impact factor: 3.776

2.  Performance of fourier domain vs. time domain optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  R Leitgeb; C Hitzenberger; Adolf Fercher
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2003-04-21       Impact factor: 3.894

3.  Flow velocity estimation using joint Spectral and Time domain Optical Coherence Tomography.

Authors:  Maciej Szkulmowski; Anna Szkulmowska; Tomasz Bajraszewski; Andrzej Kowalczyk; Maciej Wojtkowski
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2008-04-28       Impact factor: 3.894

4.  Noninvasive in vivo imaging reveals differences between tectorial membrane and basilar membrane traveling waves in the mouse cochlea.

Authors:  Hee Yoon Lee; Patrick D Raphael; Jesung Park; Audrey K Ellerbee; Brian E Applegate; John S Oghalai
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Picometer scale vibrometry in the human middle ear using a surgical microscope based optical coherence tomography and vibrometry system.

Authors:  Wihan Kim; Sangmin Kim; Shuning Huang; John S Oghalai; Brian E Applegate
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 3.732

6.  Minimal basilar membrane motion in low-frequency hearing.

Authors:  Rebecca L Warren; Sripriya Ramamoorthy; Nikola Ciganović; Yuan Zhang; Teresa M Wilson; Tracy Petrie; Ruikang K Wang; Steven L Jacques; Tobias Reichenbach; Alfred L Nuttall; Anders Fridberger
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Two-Dimensional Cochlear Micromechanics Measured In Vivo Demonstrate Radial Tuning within the Mouse Organ of Corti.

Authors:  Hee Yoon Lee; Patrick D Raphael; Anping Xia; Jinkyung Kim; Nicolas Grillet; Brian E Applegate; Audrey K Ellerbee Bowden; John S Oghalai
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Simultaneous 3D imaging of sound-induced motions of the tympanic membrane and middle ear ossicles.

Authors:  Ernest W Chang; Jeffrey T Cheng; Christof Röösli; James B Kobler; John J Rosowski; Seok Hyun Yun
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Endoscopic optical coherence tomography enables morphological and subnanometer vibratory imaging of the porcine cochlea through the round window.

Authors:  Wihan Kim; Sangmin Kim; John S Oghalai; Brian E Applegate
Journal:  Opt Lett       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 3.776

10.  Hair cell force generation does not amplify or tune vibrations within the chicken basilar papilla.

Authors:  Anping Xia; Xiaofang Liu; Patrick D Raphael; Brian E Applegate; John S Oghalai
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  5 in total

1.  Interplay between traveling wave propagation and amplification at the apex of the mouse cochlea.

Authors:  Amir Nankali; Christopher A Shera; Brian E Applegate; John S Oghalai
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 3.699

2.  Unloading outer hair cell bundles in vivo does not yield evidence of spontaneous oscillations in the mouse cochlea.

Authors:  Patricia M Quiñones; Sebastiaan W F Meenderink; Brian E Applegate; John S Oghalai
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 3.672

3.  Vector of motion measurements in the living cochlea using a 3D OCT vibrometry system.

Authors:  Wihan Kim; Derek Liu; Sangmin Kim; Kumara Ratnayake; Frank Macias-Escriva; Scott Mattison; John S Oghalai; Brian E Applegate
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 3.562

4.  Light-adapted flicker optoretinograms captured with a spatio-temporal optical coherence-tomography (STOC-T) system.

Authors:  Sławomir Tomczewski; Piotr Węgrzyn; Dawid Borycki; Egidijus Auksorius; Maciej Wojtkowski; Andrea Curatolo
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 3.562

5.  Cochlear supporting cells require GAS2 for cytoskeletal architecture and hearing.

Authors:  Tingfang Chen; Alex M Rohacek; Matthew Caporizzo; Amir Nankali; Jeroen J Smits; Jaap Oostrik; Cornelis P Lanting; Erdi Kücük; Christian Gilissen; Jiddeke M van de Kamp; Ronald J E Pennings; Staci M Rakowiecki; Klaus H Kaestner; Kevin K Ohlemiller; John S Oghalai; Hannie Kremer; Benjamin L Prosser; Douglas J Epstein
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 12.270

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.