| Literature DB >> 31878262 |
Iman Dankar1,2, Amira Haddarah1, Francesc Sepulcre2, Montserrat Pujolà2.
Abstract
The effects of agar, alginate, butter, olive oil, and carrots on the mechanical and rheological properties of potato puree prepared by two different cooking methods (microwave heating (MP) and boiling (BP)) were investigated and interpreted in terms of starch microstructural changes. Microscopic observations revealed more aggregated and densely concentrated starch granules in MP samples. This consequently led to a significant increase (p < 0.05) in mechanical and rheological properties up to five times more than BP samples. All samples exhibited shear thinning non-Newtonian behavior. Butter proved its ability to maintain stiff network formation with starch molecules forming lipid-starch complexes characterized by high retention properties and increased stability due to high thixotropic and yield stress values. The pseudo-plasticity combined with high self-supporting ability (high yield stress and mechanical values) comprised by MP samples allows them to better behave during advanced technological processes such as extrusion 3D food printing.Entities:
Keywords: 3D food printing; boiled; microscopy; microwaved; thixotropy; viscosity; yield stress
Year: 2019 PMID: 31878262 PMCID: PMC7023081 DOI: 10.3390/foods9010021
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Figure 1Microscopic images (10×) of (a) boiled potato, (b) microwaved potato, and (c) raw potato stained with Lugol’s iodine solution.
Mechanical characteristics values of firmness (Kg), consistency (Kg·s), and cohesiveness (Kg) of potato tubers with different types of food additives and after being exposed to two methods of cooking microwaving (MP) and boiling (BP).
| Samples | Firmness (Kg) | Consistency (Kg s) | Cohesiveness (Kg) |
|---|---|---|---|
| MP | 0.52 ± 0.03 d,e | 6.42 ± 0.65 d,e | 0.49 ± 0.004 d,e |
| MP + 1% agar | 1.54 ± 0.10 a | 18.40 ± 1.73 a | 1.55 ± 0.06 a |
| MP + 1% alginate | 0.80 ± 0.03 b | 9.87 ± 0.04 b | 0.73 ± 0.04 b |
| MP + 1% butter | 0.77 ± 0.02 b | 9.16 ± 0.30 b,c | 0.72 ± 0.01 b |
| MP + 1/3 carrot | 0.63 ± 0.04 c | 7.55 ± 0.11 c,d | 0.61 ± 0.05 c |
| MP + 1% olive oil | 0.58 ± 0.01 c,d | 7.09 ± 0.31 d,e | 0.55 ± 0.05 c,d |
| BP | 0.14 ± 0.004 g,h | 1.64 ± 0.09 f,g | 0.11 ± 0.006 g,h |
| BP + 1% agar | 0.43 ± 0.008 e | 5.51 ± 0.14 e | 0.42 ± 0.02 e |
| BP + 1% alginate | 0.27 ± 0.008 f | 3.35 ± 0.11 f | 0.24 ± 0.007 f |
| BP + 1% butter | 0.19 ± 0.003 f,g,h | 2.30 ± 0.06 f,g | 0.17 ± 0.006 f,g,h |
| BP + 1/3 carrot | 0.12 ± 0.006 h | 1.44 ± 0.07 g | 0.09 ± 0.005 h |
| BP + 1% olive oil | 0.11 ± 0.01 h | 1.36 ± 0.09 g | 0.09 ± 0.003 h |
| Microwave carrot | 0.51 ± 0.02 d,e | 6.08 ± 0.36 d,e | 0.47 ± 0.04 d,e |
| Boiled carrot | 0.23 ± 0.01 f,g | 2.70 ± 0.24 f,g | 0.19 ± 0.01 f,g |
Values are mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). Different letters (a–h) in the same column represents statistical differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 2Typical flow curve of potato tubers with different substrates (a) microwaved and (b) boiled. Inset: flow curves at a shear rate below s−1.
Figure 3Measurement of the yield stress of microwaved (MP) and boiled (BP) potato with different substrates based on the stress ramp method.
Values of thixotropy and yield stress of potato tubers with different types of food additives and after being applied to two methods of cooking microwaving (MP) and boiling (BP).
| Microwaved Potato Samples | Thixotropy | Yield Stress (Pa) | Boiled Potato | Thixotropy (Pa·s−1) | Yield Stress (Pa) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Pa·s−1) | Samples | ||||
| MP | 2231 | 280 | BP | 458.64 | 42 |
| MP + 1% agar | 8713 | 1250 | BP + 1% agar | 1791.67 | 200 |
| MP + 1% alginate | 2972 | 260 | BP + 1% alginate | 1105.78 | 120 |
| MP + 1% butter | 4633.5 | 330 | BP + 1% butter | 744.97 | 80 |
| MP + 1/3 carrot | 2866 | 280 | BP + 1/3 carrot | 371.73 | 40 |
| MP + 1% olive oil | 2885.25 | 245 | BP + 1% olive oil | 412.73 | 34 |
Effect of additives on microwaved potato samples feasibility during 3D printing.
| Microwaved Potatosamples with | Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|---|
| MP | Stable end product | Fill in of the shape not 100% ensured |
| Smooth extrusion | ||
| Withstand the printed shape over time | ||
| MP + 1% agar | Easily hand-able post printing | Poor fluidity |
| Precise definite dimension of layers | Retarded extrusion | |
| Great resistance to compressed deformation | Non-continuous flow | |
| Highest stable structured product for a long time post deposition | Rough surface structure | |
| MP + 1% alginate | Stable end product with clearly observed details | Some plugging while extruding due to alginate coagulation ability |
| Layers coincide perfectly | ||
| Smooth surface | ||
| Withstand the printed shape over time | ||
| Hand-able post printing | ||
| MP + 1% butter | Smooth continuous extrusion | |
| Creamy surface | ||
| Proper arrangement of above layers | ||
| Retaining structure integrity | ||
| Withstand the printed shape over time | ||
| Removable | ||
| MP + 1/3 carrot | Soft surface | Works better with flat-base support product |
| Smooth continuous extrusion | Poor printing in fine-thin base supported product | |
| Hold up the weight of the up deposited layers | Sticky | |
| Stable product | Susceptibility to deformation upon removal | |
| MP + 1% olive oil | Details are submissive | |
| Less precise printing | ||
| Less stable end product | ||
| Spreads after printing | ||
| Non-hand able post printing |
Figure 4Printed products of microwaved potato with (a) 1% alginate, (b) 1% butter, (c) 1/3 carrots, and (d) boiled potato with 1% butter.