| Literature DB >> 31878199 |
Li-Na Guo, Ren-Lin Zhao, Ai-Hua Ren1, Li-Xin Niu1, Yan-Long Zhang1.
Abstract
Human stress recovery response to landscapes is under discussion in Chinese settings. The present study aimed to clarify the stress recovery effects of campus street trees on graduate students in autumn. A total of 150 participants (23.75 ± 1.01 years old) completed the Trier Social Stress Test (TSST) and were then randomly assigned to view one of five virtual environments, including the street trees Sophora japonica, Ginkgo biloba, Platanus acerifolia, Koelreuteria paniculata, and the indoor environment (control). Physiological responses were measured by R-R interval and electroencephalography (EEG). Psychological responses were examined through the state version of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-S) and the Perceived Restorativeness Scale (PRS). Results showed that R-R intervals significantly increased while viewing all street trees. Both alpha and beta brainwave activities while viewing S. japonica and G. biloba were remarkably higher than those while viewing P. acerifolia and K. paniculata. The STAI-S scores significantly decreased, and the positive PRS scores were registered after viewing street trees. We concluded that a brief virtual visual experience of campus street trees in autumn has stress recovery effects on graduate students, and the different levels of stress recovery are associated with different types of street trees.Entities:
Keywords: campus street tree; graduate student; psycho-physiological indicator; stress recovery
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31878199 PMCID: PMC6982156 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17010148
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
The morphological characteristics of street trees.
| Street Trees Species | Morphological Characteristics |
|---|---|
|
| A deciduous tree, up to 25 m, trunk straight, crown wide, bark gray-brown and longitudinally striate; pinnately compound, dark green leaves in summer and yellow withered in late autumn. |
|
| A deciduous tree, up to 20 m, trunk straight, crown conical, bark grayish brown and longitudinally fissured; fan-shaped, pale green leaves in summer and golden yellow in autumn. |
|
| A deciduous tree, up to 25 m, trunk straight, crown broadly ovoid, smooth bark light gray and mottled white; broadly ovate, (3 or) 5-lobed, dark green leaves in summer and yellow-brown in autumn. |
|
| A deciduous tree, up to 20 m, crown broad and dome-shaped, bark grayish brown to black; pinnately compound, bright green leaves in summer and yellow in autumn; the fruit is orange to pink and reddish-brown, papery seed capsules which somewhat resemble Chinese lanterns in autumn. |
Figure 1The panorama of experimental scenes in the VR model. (a) Sophora japonica, (b) Ginkgo biloba, (c) Platanus acerifolia, (d) Koelreuteria paniculata, (e) Indoor environment.
Electroencephalography (EEG) brainwaves and corresponding brain state.
| Brainwaves | Frequencies (Hz) | Brain State |
|---|---|---|
| Low alpha | 8–10 | A sense of security to the surrounding environment, slack, unguarded |
| High alpha | 10–12 | No stress and anxiety, relaxed but wakeful |
| Low beta | 12–20 | Focused on mental activity |
| High beta | 20–30 | Excited, alert, attentive |
Figure 2The procedure of the experiment.
Comparison of mean values of R-R intervals and brainwaves before and after the Trier Social Stress Test (TSST).
| Parameter | Pre | Post |
|
| Cohen’s |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R-R interval | 0.828 ± 0.012 | 0.712 ± 0.010 | 15.161 | 0.000 ** | 1.029 |
| Low alpha | 26,078.684 ± 903.091 | 21,963.362 ± 1488.589 | 2.718 | 0.008 ** | 0.345 |
| High alpha | 30,033.950 ± 2079.774 | 19,874.067 ± 666.362 | 4.850 | 0.000 ** | 0.679 |
| Low beta | 9148.347 ± 684.498 | 15,835.987 ± 542.500 | −10.194 | 0.000 ** | 1.117 |
| High beta | 7727.177 ± 508.102 | 14,721.790 ± 565.273 | −11.479 | 0.000 ** | 1.342 |
N = 150, mean ± SEM. ** p < 0.01, paired-sample t-test.
Changes in R-R intervals from the stress stage to the recovery stage.
| Scenes | Mean Increase | SEM | 95% C.I. |
|
| Cohen’s | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower | Upper | ||||||
|
| 0.090 | 0.017 | 0.055 | 0.126 | 5.293 | 0.000 ** | 0.918 |
|
| 0.074 | 0.016 | 0.041 | 0.107 | 4.715 | 0.000 ** | 0.696 |
|
| 0.051 | 0.018 | 0.017 | 0.085 | 3.380 | 0.007 ** | 0.627 |
|
| 0.044 | 0.017 | 0.007 | 0.081 | 2.550 | 0.022 * | 0.407 |
| Indoor environment | 0.015 | 0.010 | −0.005 | 0.035 | 1.550 | 0.136 | 0.150 |
N = 30, mean ± SEM. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, paired sample t-test.
Figure 3Comparison of mean values of heart rate in different scenes. N = 30, mean ± SEM. Note: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, paired sample t-test.
Figure 4Comparison of mean values of (a) low alpha, (b) high alpha, (c) low beta, and (d) high beta brainwaves in different scenes. N = 30, mean ± SEM. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, paired sample t-test.
Figure 5Comparison of STAI-S scores in different scenes. N = 30, mean ± SEM. ** p < 0.01, paired sample t-test.
Figure 6Perceived Restorativeness Scale (PRS) values of different street trees. N = 30, mean ± SEM. ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, one-way ANOVA.