| Literature DB >> 31877880 |
Fabio Minervini1, Jihen Missaoui1,2, Giuseppe Celano1, Maria Calasso1, Lotfi Achour3, Dalila Saidane2, Marco Gobbetti4, Maria De Angelis1.
Abstract
Seeds of Pinus halepensis are used for preparing zgougou, a spontaneously fermented matrix giving juice and seeds debris, consumed in many Arabian countries, including Tunisia. In the same way as all the food processes based on spontaneous fermentation, zgougou hides health risks due to eventual pathogenic microorganisms and derived toxins. This study aimed at investigating the effect of the use of autochthonous Lactobacillus paraplantarum A1 and Lactobacillus plantarum A2, as fermentation starters, on the microbiological characteristics, profiles of volatile organic compounds (VOC), antibacterial and antioxidant activities of juice and seeds debris from zgougou. The starter lactobacilli inhibited undesired bacteria (e.g., Enterobacter and Aeromonas) and coccus-shaped lactic acid bacteria, as shown by culture-dependent and-independent methods. The inhibitory effect was more evident in juice than in seeds debris. Some VOC (ethanol, acetoin, phenol,2-methoxy and caryophyllene) were present at higher concentrations in juice and seeds obtained upon spontaneous fermentation, compared to the samples deriving from fermentation with lactobacilli. The latter samples were characterized by higher concentrations of acetic acid, decane, 1-nonanol, bornyl acetate and bornyl formate. In addition, they showed a wider spectrum of antibacterial activity than spontaneously fermented juice and seeds. The use of autochthonous lactobacilli did not relevantly affect the antioxidant activity of zgougou. When juice from lactobacilli-driven fermentation was used to prepare a traditional Tunisian pudding ("Assidat-Zgougou"), it improved color and odor with respect to the pudding containing juice from spontaneous fermentation. This study showed that the use, at laboratory scale, of autochthonous lactobacilli is a feasible biotechnological tool to outgrow undesired bacteria, thus improving the safety of zgougou juice. Future studies should be undertaken to confirm the observed benefits at industrial scale.Entities:
Keywords: Aleppo pine; antibacterial activity; antioxidant activity; autochthonous lactobacilli; fermentation; juice; seeds
Year: 2019 PMID: 31877880 PMCID: PMC7023124 DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms8010029
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microorganisms ISSN: 2076-2607
pH values of zgougou inoculated with autochthonous lactic acid bacteria after 24 h of fermentation at 25 °C.
| Microorganism | pH |
|---|---|
| 4.65 ± 0.02f | |
| 4.65 ± 0.01f | |
| 4.75 ± 0.03e | |
| 4.84 ± 0.02c | |
| 4.79 ± 0.02de | |
| 4.89 ± 0.01b | |
| 4.96 ± 0.01a | |
| 4.83 ± 0.02c | |
| 4.85 ± 0.03c | |
| 4.76 ± 0.02e | |
| 4.92 ± 0.03ab | |
| 4.80 ± 0.01d | |
| 4.85 ± 0.02c | |
| 4.93 ± 0.02a |
Data in the same column with different letters (a–f) are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Figure 1Cell densities (log CFU/mL or log CFU/g) of different bacterial groups found after 1 (white bars) and 24 (black bars) h of zgougou fermentation. (A) juice obtained after spontaneous fermentation (J LAB−); (B) seeds obtained after spontaneous fermentation (S LAB−); (C) juice obtained after fermentation with autochthonous lactobacilli (J LAB+); (D) seeds obtained after fermentation with autochthonous lactobacilli (S LAB+).
Alpha diversity indexes* of Bacteria (16S rRNA) found in the juice (J) and seeds (S) obtained after 24 h of zgougou fermentation (spontaneous, “LAB−”, or inoculated with autochthonous lactobacilli, “LAB+”).
| Sample | Observed Species | Chao1 | Shannon |
|---|---|---|---|
| J LAB- | 17.0 ± 1.41c | 17.3 ± 1.65c | 1.71 ± 0.032c |
| S LAB- | 21.5 ± 0.71a | 21.5 ± 0.71a | 2.06 ± 0.004a |
| J LAB+ | 3.0 ± 1.41d | 3.0 ± 1.41d | 0.44 ± 0.021d |
| S LAB+ | 20.0 ± 0.00b | 20.0 ± 0.00b | 1.91 ± 0.030b |
* Values (mean of two replicates ± standard deviation) in the same column followed by different letters (a–d) are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Relative abundance (%)* of bacterial OTUs found in the juice (J) and seeds (S) obtained after 24 h of zgougou fermentation (spontaneous, “LAB−”, or inoculated with autochthonous lactobacilli, “LAB+”).
| Bacterial OTUs | J LAB− | S LAB− | J LAB+ | S LAB+ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.22 ± 0.02b | 0.55 ± 0.34b | 0c | 0.99 ± 0.06a |
|
| 0.87 ± 0.23c | 1.60 ± 0.53b | 0c | 2.75 ± 0.48a |
|
| 43.83 ± 1.39b | 2.21 ± 0.95d | 82.89 ± 1.15a | 6.20 ± 0.19c |
|
| 0b | 0b | 0b | 9.34 ± 0.40a |
|
| 3.12 ± 0.34b | 34.74 ± 0.82a | 0c | 0c |
|
| 0.004 ± 0.00b | 0.02 ± 0.00a | 0b | 0b |
|
| 0a | 0.02 ± 0.00a | 0a | 0a |
|
| 1.43 ± 0.14b | 2.75 ± 0.05a | 0d | 0.38 ± 0.10c |
|
| 28.43 ± 0.36b | 37.68 ± 1.45a | 0d | 25.20 ± 0.47c |
|
| 0.01 ± 0.00b | 0.08 ± 0.01b | 0b | 15.55 ± 1.09a |
|
| 0.71 ± 0.04b | 1.28 ± 0.05a | 0c | 0.68 ± 0.03b |
|
| 0.06 ± 0.02b | 0.07 ± 0.00b | 0c | 0.14 ± 0.09a |
|
| 0a | 0a | 0a | 0.01 ± 0.00a |
|
| 1.92 ± 0.11b | 5.31 ± 0.09a | 0d | 0.58 ± 0.18c |
|
| 1.41 ± 0.03a | 0.02 ± 0.01c | 0d | 0.64 ± 0.62b |
|
| 0c | 0.06 ± 0.09b | 0c | 0.25 ± 0.01a |
| Other unclassified bacteria | 17.93 ± 0.93b | 13.54 ± 1.23c | 17.1 ± 1.16b | 37.22 ± 2.29a |
* Values (mean of two replicates ± standard deviation) in the same row followed by different letters (a-d) are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Concentration* (in mg/kg) of volatile organic compounds detected in the juice (J) and seeds (S) obtained after 24 h of zgougou fermentation (spontaneous, “LAB−”, or inoculated with autochthonous lactobacilli, “LAB+”).
| Compounds | Odor | J LAB− | J LAB+ | S LAB− | S LAB+ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| Ethanol | Sweet, alcoholic, ripe apple | 0.32 ± 0.142a | 0.05 ± 0.001b | 0.08 ± 0.021A | 0.01 ± 0.003B |
| 1-butanol 3-methyl | Fermented, malt, wine | 0.03 ± 0.016a | 0.01 ± 0.003a | NdA | NdA |
| 3-butoxy-1-propanol | Nf | 0.02 ± 0.009a | 0.03 ± 0.004a | NdB | 0.10 ± 0.026A |
| 1-hexanol | Green grass, flowery, woody, mild, sweet | 0.04 ± 0.021b | 0.09 ± 0.007a | 0.14 ± 0.046A | 0.19 ± 0.003A |
| 3,5-octadien-2-ol | Bean-like | Nda | Nda | 0.05 ± 0.016A | NdB |
| 1-nonanol | Ophrys | Ndb | 0.02 ± 0.000a | NdB | 0.03 ± 0.008A |
| Benzyl alcohol | Boiled cherries, moss, roasted bread, rose | 0.01 ± 0.007a | 0.01 ± 0.002a | NdA | NdA |
| Phenylethyl alcohol | Rose-honey-like, wilted rose | 0.02 ± 0.010a | 0.01 ± 0.001a | 0.04 ± 0.016A | 0.03 ± 0.007A |
|
| |||||
| Acetaldehyde | Fruity, floral, green apple, nut, penetrating | 0.01 ± 0.005a | Ndb | 0.14 ± 0.032A | 0.01 ± 0.001B |
| Octane, 4-methyl- | Nf | 0.01 ± 0.008b | 0.02 ± 0.002a | NdB | 0.02 ± 0.003A |
| Butanal, 3-methyl- | Malty, roasty cucumber-like | Nda | Nda | 0.02 ± 0.006A | NdB |
| Pentanal | Nf | Nda | Nda | 0.03 ± 0.011A | 0.03 ± 0.014A |
| Hexanal | Green, grassy, tallow | Nda | Nda | 0.26 ± 0.103A | 0.46 ± 0.288A |
| Heptanal | Fatty, rancid, citrus, malty | Nda | Nda | 0.02 ± 0.010A | 0.03 ± 0.008A |
| Octanal | Aglaia, Cymbidium, Hydnora, Ophry | Nda | Nda | 0.10 ± 0.052A | 0.08 ± 0.037A |
| Nonanal | Fat, floral, green, lemon, paint | Nda | Nda | 0.21 ± 0.096A | 0.14 ± 0.059A |
| 2-octenal | Fat, fish oil, green, nut, plastic | 0.02 ± 0.010a | 0.05 ± 0.001a | 0.22 ± 0.080A | 0.26 ± 0.067A |
| 2-furaldehyde | Almond-like | 0.03 ± 0.013a | 0.04 ± 0.005a | 0.22 ± 0.062A | 0.29 ± 0.068A |
| Decanal | Stewed, burnt, green, waxy, floral, lemon | 0.04 ± 0.017a | 0.02 ± 0.002a | 0.09 ± 0.032A | 0.05 ± 0.013A |
| Benzaldehyde | Almond, caramel | 0.02 ± 0.027a | 0.03 ± 0.010a | 0.10 ± 0.042A | 0.10 ± 0.022A |
| 2-nonenal | Fatty, tallowy, green | 0.02 ± 0.009a | 0.03 ± 0.004a | 0.07 ± 0.028A | 0.05 ± 0.012A |
| Decenal | tallow | Nda | Nda | 0.07 ± 0.020A | 0.07 ± 0.016A |
| 2-undecenal | sweet | Nda | Nda | 0.01 ± 0.005A | 0.01 ± 0.002A |
| 2,4-decadienal | seaweed | Ndb | 0.04 ± 0.010a | 0.09 ± 0.024A | 0.11 ± 0.033A |
| Benzeneacetaldehyde | Berry, geranium, honey, nut, pungent | 0.01 ± 0.007a | Ndb | NdB | 0.01 ± 0.003A |
|
| |||||
| Decane | Nf | 0.02 ± 0.009b | 0.06 ± 0.017a | 0.04 ± 0.007B | 0.07 ± 0.015A |
| Undecane | Nf | 0.08 ± 0.029a | 0.08 ± 0.006a | NdA | NdA |
| Nonane, 4,5-dimethyl- | Nf | 0.03 ± 0.009a | 0.03 ± 0.004a | NdA | NdA |
| Decane 2,4,6 dimethyl | Nf | 0.19 ± 0.074a | 0.24 ± 0.044a | 0.15 ± 0.072A | 0.15 ± 0.037A |
| Tricyclo[3.2.1.0(2,4)]octane, | Nf | 0.03 ± 0.024a | 0.04 ± 0.005a | NdA | NdA |
| Dodecane | Nf | 0.01 ± 0.016a | 0.01 ± 0.007a | NdA | NdA |
| Dodecane,4,6-dimethyl- | Nf | 0.14 ± 0.062a | 0.17 ± 0.021a | NdB | 0.03 ± 0.004A |
| Heptadecane, 2,6,10,15-tetramethyl- | Nf | 0.01 ± 0.004a | 0.01 ± 0.001a | NdA | NdA |
| Cyclopentane,1-ethenyl-3-ethyl-2-methyl | Nf | 0.034 ± 0.013b | 0.06 ± 0.007a | 0.13 ± 0.039A | 0.15 ± 0.038A |
|
| |||||
| Furan, 2-pentyl- | Butter, green bean, floral, fruity, mushroom, raw nuts | 0.02 ± 0.007a | 0.02 ± 0.003a | 0.09 ± 0.034A | 0.06 ± 0.016A |
| O-cymene | Citrus-like, solvent, gasoline | 0.04 ± 0.018a | 0.04 ± 0.005a | 0.09 ± 0.016A | 0.05 ± 0.024A |
| Estragole | Tarragon | Nda | Nda | 0.03 ± 0.014A | 0.01 ± 0.004A |
|
| |||||
| Acetic acid | Sour, nutty | Ndb | 0.20 ± 0.023a | 0.16 ± 0.030B | 0.24 ± 0.055A |
| Butanoic acid | cheese, unpleasant | Ndb | 0.01 ± 0.004a | NdA | NdA |
| Pentanoic acid | Sweet, rancid | Nda | Nda | 0,03 ± 0.007B | 0.05 ± 0.002A |
| Hexanoic acid (caproic acid) | Sweaty, cheesy, fatty, goat-like | 0.03 ± 0.008b | 0.19 ± 0.021a | 0.63 ± 0.184A | 0.81 ± 0.185A |
| Heptanoic acid | Cheese, fatty, sweaty | Ndb | 0.02 ± 0.005a | 0.07 ± 0.016A | 0.08 ± 0.018A |
| Octanoic acid | Cheese, fatty, sweaty, soapy, chocolate-like | 0.02 ± 0.00b | 0.06 ± 0.015a | 0.05 ± 0.056A | 0.16 ± 0.040A |
| Nonanoic acid | Cheese, fatty, sweaty | 0.05 ± 0.038 a | 0.09 ± 0.046a | 0.16 ± 0.007B | 0.26 ± 0.036A |
|
| |||||
| Ethyl acetate | Caramel, sweet, fruity, acid, buttery, pineapple | 0.04 ± 0.018a | 0.02 ± 0.002b | NdA | NdA |
| Hexanoic acid, ethyl ester | Apple peel-like, fruity | 0.04 ± 0.000a | Ndb | NdA | NdA |
| Butanoic acid, pentyl ester | Nf | Nda | Nda | NdB | 0.02 ± 0.003A |
| Sulfurous acid, nonyl pentyl ester | Nf | Nda | Nda | 0.07 ± 0.023A | NdB |
| Octanoic acid, ethyl ester | Alcohol-like, Fruity, citrus-like | 0.03 ± 0.010a | Ndb | NdA | NdA |
| Hexanoic acid, etenhyl ester | Nf | 0.02 ± 0.010a | 0.0 ± 0.003a | 0.08 ± 0.025A | 0.10 ± 0.019A |
|
| |||||
| 2-heptanone | Soapy, fruity, cinnamon | Nda | Nda | 0.02 ± 0.004B | 0.04 ± 0.004A |
| Acetoin | flowery, wet, butter, cream | 0.15 ± 0.025a | 0.11 ± 0.000b | 0.89 ± 0.259A | 0.07 ± 0.012B |
| 2-octanone | Gasoline, mould, soap | Ndb | 0.03 ± 0.009a | 0.04 ± 0.008A | 0.03 ± 0.005A |
| 2-undecanone | fresh, green | Nda | Nda | NdB | 0.03 ± 0.007A |
| Acetophenone | Cheesy, sweet, almond, floral | 0.02 ± 0.017 | Ndb | NdA | NdA |
|
| |||||
| 1,3,5,7-cyclooctatetraene | Nf | 0.01 ± 0.002a | Nda | NdA | NdA |
| Indole | mothball, burnt | 0.01 ± 0.018a | Ndb | NdA | NdA |
|
| |||||
| Phenol, 2-methoxy- | Phenol, | 0.43 ± 0.018a | 0.02 ± 0.008b | 0.54 ± 0.203A | 0.06 ± 0.016B |
| Phenol | Phenol | 0.05 ± 0.002a | 0.01 ± 0.003b | 0.08 ± 0.029A | NdB |
| P-cresol | medicine, phenol, smoke | 0.01 ± 0.000a | Ndb | NdA | NdA |
| Vanillin | Vanilla | Nda | Nda | NdB | 0.01 ± 0.004A |
|
| |||||
| α-pinene | Woody-spicy, oily, pine-like | 3.45 ± 1.392a | 3.21 ± 0.373a | 2.63 ± 0.707A | 2.56 ± 0.470A |
| β-pinene | resinous-piney, dry-terpenous | 0.01 ± 0.008a | 0.01 ± 0.005a | 0.04 ± 0.023A | 0.02 ± 0.005A |
| Camphene | Camphor | 0.04 ± 0.017a | 0.04 ± 0.003a | 0.03 ± 0.009A | 0.03 ± 0.004A |
| 3-carene | lemon, resin | 0.09 ± 0.036a | 0.09 ± 0.007a | 0.07 ± 0.017A | 0.07 ± 0.013A |
| β-myrcene | weak citrus and lime-like | 3.05 ± 1.216a | 3.07 ± 0.497a | 3.60 ± 0.898A | 3.63 ± 0.730A |
| D-limonene | Citrus, Licorice, citrus, green, fruity | 0.33 ± 0.145a | 0.28 ± 0.027a | 0.18 ± 0.061A | 0.22 ± 0.040A |
| β-phellandrene | citrus-like, weak herbal-spicy | 0.02 ± 0.035a | 0.03 ± 0.006a | NdB | 0.06 ± 0.007A |
| 4-methylisopropenyl-benzene | Nf | 0.02 ± 0.010a | 0.02 ± 0.003a | 0.03 ± 0.016A | 0.03 ± 0.006A |
| 1,7,7-trimethylbicyclo [2.2.1]heptane-2,5-diol | Nf | Ndb | 0.02 ± 0.001a | NdA | NdA |
| (+)-α-gurjunene | wood, balsamic | Ndb | 0.01 ± 0.014a | 0.05 ± 0.012A | NdB |
| Bornyl acetate | Nf | Ndb | 0.01 ± 0.001a | 0.01 ± 0.004B | 0.03 ± 0.008A |
| Caryophyllene | Dry, woody-spicy | 0.28 ± 0.000a | 0.05 ± 0.006b | 0.30 ± 0.104A | 0.07 ± 0.016B |
| Verbenol | Nf | 0.02 ± 0.000a | 0.01 ± 0.001a | 0.03 ± 0.008A | 0.03 ± 0.007A |
| Verbenone | Nf | 0.05 ± 0.076a | 0.04 ± 0.003a | 0.12 ± 0.046A | 0.06 ± 0.007A |
| Borneol | Pungent, mint | 0.02 ± 0.018a | 0.02 ± 0.000a | 0.02 ± 0.007A | 0.02 ± 0.013A |
| (-)-carvone | Nf | 0.01 ± 0.008a | Ndb | 0.03 ± 0.010A | 0.01 ± 0.005A |
| α.-farnesene | wood, sweet | Nda | Nda | NdB | 0.05 ± 0.002A |
| Bornyl formate | Green | Ndb | 0.01 ± 0.000a | NdB | 0.02 ± 0.013A |
* Values (mean of six replicates ± standard deviation) in the same row with different superscript lowercase letters (a, b; J LAB and J LAB+) or uppercase letters (A, B; S LAB- and S LAB+) differ significantly (p < 0.05). Nd, not detected. Nf, not found in literature.
Antibacterial activity§ of juice (J) and seeds (S) obtained after 24 h of fermentation (spontaneous, LAB−, or inoculated, LAB+, with autochthonous lactobacilli) of Aleppo pine’s seeds.
| Target Bacterial Species | J LAB− | J LAB+ | S LAB− | S LAB+ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| − | + | − | + |
|
| − | + | − | + |
|
| + | + | − | + |
|
| + | + | + | + |
|
| − | ++ | + | + |
|
| − | ++ | + | + |
| − | + | + | + | |
|
| + | + | − | + |
|
| − | ++ | + | + |
|
| − | + | − | − |
§ −, no inhibition; +, 4 mm < diameter of inhibition halo <10 mm; ++, diameter of inhibition halo >10 mm.
Figure 2Antioxidant activity of juice (J) and seeds (S) obtained after spontaneous fermentation (LAB−) or fermentation with autochthonous lactobacilli (LAB+), as assessed through determination of ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) assay after 30 min (A) and 2,2-DiPhenyl-1-PicrylHydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging activity after 0 (black bars), 20 (grey) and 120 (light grey) min (B). Ascorbic acid was used as positive control in both the assays. Butyl hydroxy toluene (BHT) was used as additional positive control in the DPPH assay. Within readings performed at the same incubation time, bars labelled with at least one common letter were not significantly different (p = 0.05).
Figure 3Antioxidant activity of ethanolic extracts of pudding prepared using fermented (P LAB−, spontaneously, or, P LAB+, inoculated with autochthonous lactobacilli) zgougou juice, as assessed through determination of FRAP assay after 30 min (A) and DPPH radical scavenging activity after 120 min (B). Pudding P, produced without addition of fermented zgougou juice, was used as control. Ascorbic acid was used as positive control. BHT was used as additional positive control in the DPPH assay. The extract of each pudding was tested at 100 g/L (grey bars) or 500 g/L (white). Bars labelled with at least one common letter were not significantly different (p = 0.05).
Figure 4Sensory analysis of pudding prepared using juice from spontaneously fermented (P LAB−, ―•―) or fermented with autochthonous lactobacilli (P LAB+, ---◦---) zgougou.
Figure 5Schematic protocol applied to obtain juice (J) and seeds debris (S) from zgougou fermented with autochthonous lactobacilli (J LAB+, S LAB+) and from non-inoculated, spontaneously fermented zgougou (J LAB−, S LAB−).