| Literature DB >> 31877150 |
Qiu-Yu Li1, Zi-Lan Li1, Ming-Xing Lu1,2, Shuang-Shuang Cao1, Yu-Zhou Du1,2.
Abstract
In quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR), data are normalized using reference genes, which helps to control for internal differences and reduce error among samples. In this study, the expression profiles of eight candidate housekeeping genes, 18S ribosomal (18S rRNA), elongation factor (EF1), glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), ribosomal protein L10 (RPL10), ribosomal protein L17 (RPL17), histone 3 (H3), arginine kinase (AK), amd β-Actin (ACTB), were evaluated in the parasitic wasp Cotesia chilonis in response to different temperatures. Specifically, the performance and stabilities of these genes were compared in adult wasps maintained in a growth condition at 27°C (normal storage conditions) and in adults obtained from pupae refrigerated at 4°C for five days (cold storage conditions). Data were analyzed using the ΔCt method, BestKeeper, NormFinder, and geNorm. The optimal numbers and stabilities of reference genes varied between the two temperature treatments (27°C and 4°C). In samples stored at normal developmental temperature (27°C), the requirement for normalization in response to low temperature exposures was three genes (18S, H3, AK), whereas normalization in response to high temperature exposures required only two reference genes (GAPDH, ACTB). In samples stored at cold temperature (4°C), for low temperature exposures two reference genes (RPL17, RPL10) were required for standardization, while following high temperature exposures three reference genes (18S, H3, ACTB) were needed. This study strengthens understanding of the selection of reference genes before qRT-PCR analysis in C. chilonis. The reference genes identified here will facilitate further investigations of the biological characteristics of this important parasitoid.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31877150 PMCID: PMC6932786 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226139
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Primer sequences and characteristics of amplified reference genes.
| Gene | Primer pair | Primer sequences (5’-3’) | Amplicon | E | Tm (°C) | R2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 72 | 91 | 54 | 0.998 | |||
| 92 | 97.8 | 55.5 | 0.994 | |||
| 203 | 106.7 | 58.1 | 0.978 | |||
| 122 | 97.4 | 58.1 | 0.978 | |||
| 121 | 99.9 | 56.7 | 0.976 | |||
| 141 | 91.6 | 56.1 | 0.983 | |||
| 113 | 105.6 | 56.5 | 0.990 | |||
| 102 | 100.6 | 56.7 | 0.980 |
F and R refer to forward and reverse primers, respectively.
Real-time qPCR efficiency (calculated from the standard curve).
c Coefficient of determination.
Fig 1Expression stability of candidate reference genes in C. chilonis exposed to different temperatures.
(A) All C. chilonis samples (n = 272). Samples stored at 27°C and then exposed to (B) high temperatures (n = 32) or (C) low temperatures (n = 104). Ct values of reference genes in C. chilonis subjected to cold storage (4°C) and then exposed to (D) high temperatures (n = 40) or (E) low temperatures (n = 112). Solid circles denote the mean of duplicate samples and the bars indicate minimum to maximum values.
Ranking of candidate reference genes of Cotesia chilonis stored at 27 oC and then subjected to low temperatures.
| Conditions | Rank | ΔCt | BestKeeper | Normfinder | geNorm | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gene name | Standard deviation | Gene name | Standard deviation | Gene name | Stability value | Gene name | Stability value | ||
| 1 | ACTB/18S | 1.329 | H3 | 3.083 | 18S | 0.649 | 18S/H3 | 1.164 | |
| 2 | RPL10 | 3.374 | H3 | 0.732 | |||||
| 3 | RPL10 | 1.436 | AK | 3.674 | ACTB | 0.815 | AK | 1.531 | |
| 4 | AK | 1.445 | RPL17 | 3.712 | RPL10 | 0.986 | GAPDH | 1.749 | |
| 5 | H3 | 1.461 | 18S | 3.925 | GAPDH | 0.994 | ACTB | 1.819 | |
| 6 | GAPDH | 1.590 | ACTB | 4.324 | AK | 1.062 | RPL10 | 1.866 | |
| 7 | RPL17 | 1.702 | GAPDH | 4.583 | EF1 | 1.462 | EF1 | 1.971 | |
| 8 | EF1 | 1.735 | EF1 | 4.705 | RPL17 | 1.638 | RPL17 | 2.145 | |
Expression stability was measured using the ΔCt method, BestKeeper, Normfinder, and geNorm and then ranked from most to least stable.
Ranking of candidate reference genes of Cotesia chilonis stored at 27 oC and then exposed to high temperatures.
| Conditions | Rank | ΔCt | BestKeeper | Normfinder | geNorm | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gene name | Standard deviation | Gene name | Standard deviation | Gene name | Stability value | Gene name | Stability value | ||
| 1 | GAPDH | 0.330 | GAPDH | 0.063 | GAPDH | 0.138 | GAPDH/ACTB | 0.254 | |
| 2 | H3 | 0.360 | ACTB | 0.140 | RPL10 | 0.168 | |||
| 3 | ACTB | 0.362 | AK | 0.231 | 18S | 0.178 | 18S | 0.306 | |
| 4 | RPL10 | 0.366 | 18S | 0.253 | ACTB | 0.211 | RPL10 | 0.363 | |
| 5 | 18S | 0.378 | RPL10 | 0.307 | H3 | 0.255 | H3 | 0.395 | |
| 6 | AK | 0.438 | H3 | 0.314 | AK | 0.329 | AK | 0.431 | |
| 7 | EF1 | 0.446 | EF1 | 0.340 | EF1 | 0.338 | EF1 | 0.457 | |
| 8 | RPL17 | 0.637 | RPL17 | 0.654 | RPL17 | 0.548 | RPL17 | 0.552 | |
Expression stability was measured using the ΔCt method, BestKeeper, Normfinder, and geNorm and then ranked from most to least stable.
Ranking of candidate reference genes of Cotesia chilonis stored at 4 oC and then subjected to low temperatures.
| Conditions | Rank | ΔCt | BestKeeper | Normfinder | geNorm | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gene name | Standard deviation | Gene name | Standard deviation | Gene name | Stability value | Gene name | Stability value | ||
| 1 | GAPDH | 0.494 | RPL10 | 0.370 | H3 | 0.255 | RPL10/RPL17 | 0.451 | |
| 2 | H3 | 0.501 | GAPDH | 0.382 | GAPDH | 0.257 | |||
| 3 | ACTB | 0.521 | RPL17 | 0.530 | ACTB | 0.264 | H3 | 0.504 | |
| 4 | AK | 0.564 | ACTB | 0.565 | 18S | 0.378 | GAPDH | 0.572 | |
| 5 | 18S | 0.585 | H3 | 0.604 | AK | 0.388 | ACTB | 0.630 | |
| 6 | RPL10 | 0.599 | AK | 0.663 | RPL10 | 0.411 | AK | 0.656 | |
| 7 | RPL17 | 0.616 | 18S | 0.670 | RPL17 | 0.412 | 18S | 0.687 | |
| 8 | EF1 | 0.682 | EF1 | 0.758 | EF1 | 0.537 | EF1 | 0.741 | |
Expression stability was measured using the ΔCt method, BestKeeper, Normfinder, and geNorm and then ranked from most to least stable.
Ranking of candidate reference genes of Cotesia chilonis stored at 4 oC and then subjected to high temperatures.
| Conditions | Rank | Δ Ct | BestKeeper | Normfinder | geNorm | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gene name | Standard deviation | Gene name | Standard deviation | Gene name | Stability value | Gene name | Stability value | ||
| 1 | H3 | 0.299 | H3 | 0.097 | H3 | 0.089 | H3/18S | 0.201 | |
| 2 | 18S | 0.312 | ACTB | 0.125 | 18S | 0.095 | |||
| 3 | ACTB | 0.337 | 18S | 0.179 | ACTB | 0.208 | ACTB | 0.263 | |
| 4 | RPL10 | 0.361 | RPL10 | 0.240 | EF1 | 0.219 | RPL10 | 0.299 | |
| 5 | EF1 | 0.363 | RPL17 | 0.273 | RPL17/GAPDH | 0.221 | RPL17 | 0.324 | |
| 6 | GAPDH | 0.376 | EF1 | 0.290 | EF1 | 0.356 | |||
| 7 | RPL17 | 0.393 | GAPDH | 0.322 | RPL10 | 0.243 | GAPDH | 0.381 | |
| 8 | AK | 0.698 | AK | 0.727 | AK | 0.569 | AK | 0.502 | |
Expression stability was measured using the ΔCt method, BestKeeper, Normfinder, and geNorm and then ranked from most to least stable.
Fig 2Optimal number of reference genes for normalization in C. chilonis stored at 27°C. Pairwise variation (Vn/Vn+1) was analyzed between normalization factors NFn and NFn+1 by geNorm to determine the optimal number of reference genes.
When values fell below the 0.15 cut-off value (dashed line), additional genes were not required for normalization of gene expression.
Fig 3Optimal number of reference genes for normalization in C. chilonis stored at 4°C.
Pairwise variation (Vn/Vn+1) was analyzed between normalization factors NFn and NFn+1 by geNorm to determine the optimal number of reference genes. When values fell below the 0.15 cut-off, additional genes were not required for normalization of gene expression.