| Literature DB >> 31876886 |
Daphne A van Wees1, Janneke C M Heijne1, Maartje Basten2,3, Titia Heijman2, John de Wit4, Mirjam E E Kretzschmar1,3, Chantal den Daas1,4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Great heterogeneity in sexually transmitted infections (STI) risk exists, and investigating individual-level characteristics related to changes in STI risk over time might facilitate the development and implementation of effective evidence-based behavior change interventions. The aim of this study was to identify longitudinal patterns of STI risk based on psychological and behavioral characteristics.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 31876886 PMCID: PMC7012346 DOI: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000001110
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sex Transm Dis ISSN: 0148-5717 Impact factor: 2.830
Figure 1Psychological and behavioral characteristics of each latent class. a Health goals = perceived importance of (sexual) health. b Attitudes = attitudes regarding prevention of chlamydia. c Intentions = intentions regarding condom use and STI testing. d Knowledge = knowledge on sexual health in terms of prevention and consequences of chlamydia. e Self-efficacy = self-efficacy regarding condom use. f Social context = social context regarding condom use and STI testing (ie, social support, social and subjective norms). g Condom use = condom use in general, high = usually/always. * Univariate logistic regression P < 0.05, Overall low-risk = reference group. Abbreviation(s): CT = Chlamydia trachomatis.
Figure 2Longitudinal patterns with 4 latent classes based on psychological and behavioral characteristics over 1 year follow-up among heterosexual STI clinic visitors aged 18–24 years (n = 810). At baseline, people start in a class, and can stay in that class (broad straight lines to next follow-up moment), or move to another class (diagonal gray lines to next follow-up moment). http://rpubs.com/dvwees/Figure2.
Latent Transition Probabilities at Baseline, 3-Week, 6-Month, and 1-Year Follow-up for the Total Study Population (N = 810)
Class Proportions in the LTA at Baseline, 3-Week, 6-Month and 1-Year Follow-Up Based on the Estimated Model