Literature DB >> 31876546

Computational analysis of flow cytometry data in hematological malignancies: future clinical practice?

Carolien Duetz1, Costa Bachas, Theresia M Westers, Arjan A van de Loosdrecht.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review outlines the advancements that have been made in computational analysis for clinical flow cytometry data in hematological malignancies. RECENT
FINDINGS: In recent years, computational analysis methods have been applied to clinical flow cytometry data of hematological malignancies with promising results. Most studies combined dimension reduction (principle component analysis) or clustering methods (FlowSOM, generalized mixture models) with machine learning classifiers (support vector machines, random forest). For diagnosis and classification of hematological malignancies, many studies have reported results concordant with manual expert analysis, including B-cell chronic lymphoid leukemia detection and acute leukemia classification. Other studies, e.g. concerning diagnosis of myelodysplastic syndromes and classification of lymphoma, have shown to be able to increase diagnostic accuracy. With respect to treatment response monitoring, studies have focused on, for example, computational minimal residual disease detection in multiple myeloma and posttreatment classification of healthy or diseased in acute myeloid leukemia. The results of these studies are encouraging, although accurate relapse prediction remains challenging. To facilitate clinical implementation, collaboration and (prospective) validation in multicenter setting are necessary.
SUMMARY: Computational analysis methods for clinical flow cytometry data hold the potential to increase ease of use, objectivity and accuracy in the clinical work-up of hematological malignancies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31876546     DOI: 10.1097/CCO.0000000000000607

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Oncol        ISSN: 1040-8746            Impact factor:   3.645


  10 in total

Review 1.  Analyzing high-dimensional cytometry data using FlowSOM.

Authors:  Katrien Quintelier; Artuur Couckuyt; Annelies Emmaneel; Joachim Aerts; Yvan Saeys; Sofie Van Gassen
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 13.491

Review 2.  Application of machine learning in the management of acute myeloid leukemia: current practice and future prospects.

Authors:  Jan-Niklas Eckardt; Martin Bornhäuser; Karsten Wendt; Jan Moritz Middeke
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2020-12-08

3.  Artificial Intelligence Enhances Diagnostic Flow Cytometry Workflow in the Detection of Minimal Residual Disease of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.

Authors:  Mohamed E Salama; Gregory E Otteson; Jon J Camp; Jansen N Seheult; Dragan Jevremovic; David R Holmes; Horatiu Olteanu; Min Shi
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-21       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 4.  The potential of proliferative and apoptotic parameters in clinical flow cytometry of myeloid malignancies.

Authors:  Stefan G C Mestrum; Anton H N Hopman; Frans C S Ramaekers; Math P G Leers
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2021-04-13

Review 5.  Myelodysplastic syndromes: moving towards personalized management.

Authors:  Eva Hellström-Lindberg; Magnus Tobiasson; Peter Greenberg
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 9.941

6.  Clustering and Kernel Density Estimation for Assessment of Measurable Residual Disease by Flow Cytometry.

Authors:  Hugues Jacqmin; Bernard Chatelain; Quentin Louveaux; Philippe Jacqmin; Jean-Michel Dogné; Carlos Graux; François Mullier
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-18

Review 7.  The Evolution of Single-Cell Analysis and Utility in Drug Development.

Authors:  Shibani Mitra-Kaushik; Anita Mehta-Damani; Jennifer J Stewart; Cherie Green; Virginia Litwin; Christèle Gonneau
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2021-08-13       Impact factor: 4.009

8.  CD158k and PD-1 expressions define heterogeneous subtypes of Sezary syndrome.

Authors:  Inès Vergnolle; Claudia Douat-Beyries; Serge Boulinguez; Jean-Baptiste Rieu; Jean-Philippe Vial; Rolande Baracou; Sylvie Boudot; Aurore Cazeneuve; Sophie Chaugne; Martine Durand; Sylvie Estival; Nicolas Lablanche; Marie-Laure Nicolau-Travers; Emilie Tournier; Laurence Lamant; François Vergez
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2022-03-22

Review 9.  How artificial intelligence might disrupt diagnostics in hematology in the near future.

Authors:  Wencke Walter; Claudia Haferlach; Niroshan Nadarajah; Ines Schmidts; Constanze Kühn; Wolfgang Kern; Torsten Haferlach
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 9.867

10.  De Novo Identification and Visualization of Important Cell Populations for Classic Hodgkin Lymphoma Using Flow Cytometry and Machine Learning.

Authors:  Paul D Simonson; Yue Wu; David Wu; Jonathan R Fromm; Aaron Y Lee
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 5.400

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.