Literature DB >> 31875724

Unpacking Medical Students' Mixed Engagement in Health Systems Science Education.

Jed D Gonzalo1, Christopher Davis2, Britta M Thompson1, Paul Haidet1.   

Abstract

Phenomenon: Medical education is better aligning with the needs of health systems. Health systems science competencies, such as high-value care, population health, and systems thinking, are increasingly being integrated into curricula, but not without challenges. One challenge is mixed receptivity by students, the underlying reasons of which have not been extensively explored. In this qualitative study, we explored the research question: "How do students perceive health systems science curricula across all four years, and how do such perceptions inform the reasons for mixed quality ratings?" Approach: Following large-scale health systems science curricular changes in their medical school, we used students' open-ended comments obtained from course evaluations related to 1st-, 2nd-, and 4th-year courses and performed a qualitative thematic analysis to explore students' perceptions. We identified themes, synthesized findings into a conceptual figure, and agreed upon results and quotations. Findings: Five themes were identified: (1) perceived importance and relevance of health systems science education, (2) tension between traditional and evolving health systems science-related professional identity, (3) dissatisfaction with redundancy of topics, (4) competition with basic and clinical science curricula, and, (5) preference for discrete, usable, testable facts over complexity and uncertainty. The relationship between themes is described along a continuum of competing agendas between students' traditional mindset (which focuses on basic/clinical science) and an emerging medical education approach (which focuses on basic, clinical, and health systems science). Insights: Health systems science education can be viewed by learners as peripheral to their future practice and not aligned with a professional identity that places emphasis on basic and clinical science topics. For some students, this traditional identity limits engagement in health systems science curricula. If health systems science is to achieve its full potential in medical education, further work is required to explore the adoption of new perspectives by students and create activities to accelerate the process.

Keywords:  Health systems science; curricular development; curricular improvement; evaluation; qualitative methods; student engagement; systems-based practice

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31875724     DOI: 10.1080/10401334.2019.1704765

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Teach Learn Med        ISSN: 1040-1334            Impact factor:   2.414


  4 in total

1.  The Student Navigator Project (SNaP): Preparing Students Through Longitudinal Learning.

Authors:  Reem Hasan; Rachel Caron; Hannah Kim; Gina M Phillipi; Tajwar Taher; Kanwarabijit Thind; Erin Urbanowicz
Journal:  Med Sci Educ       Date:  2020-04-25

2.  Interprofessional Collaboration-Time for a New Theory of Action?

Authors:  Ray Samuriwo
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-03-18

3.  Transformative learning of medical trainees during the COVID-19 pandemic: A mixed methods study.

Authors:  Benjamin Vipler; Bethany Snyder; Jennifer McCall-Hosenfeld; Paul Haidet; Mark Peyrot; Heather Stuckey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-16       Impact factor: 3.752

Review 4.  Optimising planned medical education strategies to develop learners' person-centredness: A realist review.

Authors:  Aarti Bansal; Sarah Greenley; Caroline Mitchell; Sophie Park; Katie Shearn; Joanne Reeve
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 7.647

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.