Zi-Yan Liu1, Ling Zhao1, Li-Yuan Yang1, Xu Gao1. 1. Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Oral Tissue Regeneration, Jinan 250012, China;Dept. of Prosthodontics, School & Hospital of Stomatology, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, China.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates the effects of different endodontic access methods and full-ceramic crown on the stress distribution in the maxillary central incisor by using three-dimensional finite element analysis. METHODS: Computed tomography scans of the maxillary central incisor were used to construct a three-dimensional finite element model of the maxillary central incisor. According to the different methods of endodontic and the prosthetic treatments, four models were established, namely, group A (traditional access cavity preparation with resin filling), group B (traditional access cavity preparation restored full-ceramic crown), group C (minimally invasive endodontics with resin filling) and group D (minimally invasive endodontics restored full-ceramic crown). A static force of 100 N and a direction of 45° was applied to the long axis of the tooth at the junction of the incisal section one-third and middle section one-third. The maximum principal stress, the von Mises stress and the modified von Mises stress of the tooth tissue were analyzed using the finite-element analysis software. RESULTS: 1) Stress peaks: the stress peaks of the maximum principal stress, the von Mises stress and the modified von Mises in group A were the largest, except that the stress peak of von Mises stress in group D was slightly lower than that in group C. The stress peaks of the maximum principal stress and the modified von Mises in group C were the lowest. The stress peaks of the maximum principal stress and the modi-fied von Mises stress in group D were lower than those in groups A and B. 2) Stress distribution: compared with group A, the stress distribution of cervical dentin and the area of stress concentration in group C was lower and smaller. In the root dentin, the stress distribution in group C was more uniform than that in group A, and the stress was dispersed to several areas of the root apex. After crown restoration, no significant difference was observed in stress distribution between groups B and D in the root region. The stress distribution state of group B was not significantly different from that of group A. No significant difference was observed in the stress distribution state between groups D and C. CONCLUSIONS: 1) From the perspective of biomechanics, the minimally invasive access was adopted for the maxillary central incisor. 2) Full crown restoration is recommended after traditional access cavity preparation. No obvious advantage is observed in stress analysis for minimally invasive endodontics-restored full-ceramic crown.
OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates the effects of different endodontic access methods and full-ceramic crown on the stress distribution in the maxillary central incisor by using three-dimensional finite element analysis. METHODS: Computed tomography scans of the maxillary central incisor were used to construct a three-dimensional finite element model of the maxillary central incisor. According to the different methods of endodontic and the prosthetic treatments, four models were established, namely, group A (traditional access cavity preparation with resin filling), group B (traditional access cavity preparation restored full-ceramic crown), group C (minimally invasive endodontics with resin filling) and group D (minimally invasive endodontics restored full-ceramic crown). A static force of 100 N and a direction of 45° was applied to the long axis of the tooth at the junction of the incisal section one-third and middle section one-third. The maximum principal stress, the von Mises stress and the modified von Mises stress of the tooth tissue were analyzed using the finite-element analysis software. RESULTS: 1) Stress peaks: the stress peaks of the maximum principal stress, the von Mises stress and the modified von Mises in group A were the largest, except that the stress peak of von Mises stress in group D was slightly lower than that in group C. The stress peaks of the maximum principal stress and the modified von Mises in group C were the lowest. The stress peaks of the maximum principal stress and the modi-fied von Mises stress in group D were lower than those in groups A and B. 2) Stress distribution: compared with group A, the stress distribution of cervical dentin and the area of stress concentration in group C was lower and smaller. In the root dentin, the stress distribution in group C was more uniform than that in group A, and the stress was dispersed to several areas of the root apex. After crown restoration, no significant difference was observed in stress distribution between groups B and D in the root region. The stress distribution state of group B was not significantly different from that of group A. No significant difference was observed in the stress distribution state between groups D and C. CONCLUSIONS: 1) From the perspective of biomechanics, the minimally invasive access was adopted for the maxillary central incisor. 2) Full crown restoration is recommended after traditional access cavity preparation. No obvious advantage is observed in stress analysis for minimally invasive endodontics-restored full-ceramic crown.
Entities:
Keywords:
endodontic access method; full crown; minimally invasive endodontics; three-dimensional finite element