Jasmine Mote1, Daniel Fulford2. 1. Sargent College of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Boston University, 635 Commonwealth Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA. Electronic address: mote@bu.edu. 2. Sargent College of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Boston University, 635 Commonwealth Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA; Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Boston University, 64 Cummington Mall, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Our goal in the current review was to summarize the existing literature on the utility of ecological momentary assessment (EMA) in assessing the social experiences of people with schizophrenia (SZ). We were further interested in examining the associations between EMA-reported social outcomes and traditional assessments of social functioning. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of EMA studies published between January 1, 1990 and October 31, 2018 from PubMed and PsycINFO electronic databases. We included EMA studies that assessed social experiences (proportion of time spent alone/with others, affective experiences when with others, social stress, factors related to social experiences) in people with SZ. We included studies that examined associations between laboratory-based, self-report, or clinical assessments of functioning with EMA-reported social experiences. RESULTS: We identified 22 EMA studies for inclusion in this review. Though heterogeneous in aspects of social experiences assessed, the current literature suggests that people with SZ report more social stress and a preference to be alone when they are with others (nine out of 10 studies). People with SZ report more positive affect when they are with others compared to being alone, and equivalent amounts of positive affect during social experiences as healthy controls (all four studies assessed). Five studies assessed the coherence between functioning assessments and momentary social experiences, with mixed results. CONCLUSION: We discuss limitations of the literature and future directions. EMA shows promise in assessing more granular aspects of social experience (including social stress and social pleasure) in people with SZ compared to other methods.
INTRODUCTION: Our goal in the current review was to summarize the existing literature on the utility of ecological momentary assessment (EMA) in assessing the social experiences of people with schizophrenia (SZ). We were further interested in examining the associations between EMA-reported social outcomes and traditional assessments of social functioning. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of EMA studies published between January 1, 1990 and October 31, 2018 from PubMed and PsycINFO electronic databases. We included EMA studies that assessed social experiences (proportion of time spent alone/with others, affective experiences when with others, social stress, factors related to social experiences) in people with SZ. We included studies that examined associations between laboratory-based, self-report, or clinical assessments of functioning with EMA-reported social experiences. RESULTS: We identified 22 EMA studies for inclusion in this review. Though heterogeneous in aspects of social experiences assessed, the current literature suggests that people with SZ report more social stress and a preference to be alone when they are with others (nine out of 10 studies). People with SZ report more positive affect when they are with others compared to being alone, and equivalent amounts of positive affect during social experiences as healthy controls (all four studies assessed). Five studies assessed the coherence between functioning assessments and momentary social experiences, with mixed results. CONCLUSION: We discuss limitations of the literature and future directions. EMA shows promise in assessing more granular aspects of social experience (including social stress and social pleasure) in people with SZ compared to other methods.
Authors: Sayli M Narkhede; Lauren Luther; Ian M Raugh; Anna R Knippenberg; Farnaz Zamani Esfahlani; Hiroki Sayama; Alex S Cohen; Brian Kirkpatrick; Gregory P Strauss Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2022-03-01 Impact factor: 9.306
Authors: Gregory P Strauss; Ian M Raugh; Luyu Zhang; Lauren Luther; Hannah C Chapman; Daniel N Allen; Brian Kirkpatrick; Alex S Cohen Journal: Schizophrenia (Heidelb) Date: 2022-04-15
Authors: Philip D Harvey; Michelle L Miller; Raeanne C Moore; Colin A Depp; Emma M Parrish; Amy E Pinkham Journal: Innov Clin Neurosci Date: 2021-01-01
Authors: Ian M Raugh; Sydney H James; Cristina M Gonzalez; Hannah C Chapman; Alex S Cohen; Brian Kirkpatrick; Gregory P Strauss Journal: J Psychiatr Res Date: 2021-04-30 Impact factor: 5.250
Authors: Colin A Depp; Snigdha Kamarsu; Tess F Filip; Emma M Parrish; Philip D Harvey; Eric L Granholm; Samantha Chalker; Raeanne C Moore; Amy Pinkham Journal: Psychol Med Date: 2021-01-12 Impact factor: 10.592
Authors: Daniel Fulford; Jasmine Mote; Rachel Gonzalez; Samuel Abplanalp; Yuting Zhang; Jarrod Luckenbaugh; Jukka-Pekka Onnela; Carlos Busso; David E Gard Journal: J Psychiatr Res Date: 2020-11-04 Impact factor: 4.791
Authors: Emma M Parrish; Samantha A Chalker; Mayra Cano; Raeanne C Moore; Amy E Pinkham; Philip D Harvey; Thomas Joiner; Amy Lieberman; Eric Granholm; Colin A Depp Journal: J Psychiatr Res Date: 2021-06-15 Impact factor: 4.791
Authors: Dominika Kwasnicka; Dimitra Kale; Verena Schneider; Jan Keller; Bernard Yeboah-Asiamah Asare; Daniel Powell; Felix Naughton; Gill A Ten Hoor; Peter Verboon; Olga Perski Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2021-07-16 Impact factor: 2.692