Literature DB >> 31874093

Plasma vs. serum in circulating tumor DNA measurement: characterization by DNA fragment sizing and digital droplet polymerase chain reaction.

Jee-Soo Lee1, Miyoung Kim1, Moon-Woo Seong2, Han-Sung Kim1, Young Kyung Lee1, Hee Jung Kang1.   

Abstract

Background Choosing the specimen type is the first step of the pre-analytical process. Previous reports suggested plasma as the optimal specimen for circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis. However, head-to-head comparisons between plasma and serum using platforms with high analytical sensitivity, such as droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR), are limited, and several recent studies have supported the clinical utility of serum-derived ctDNA. This study aimed to compare the DNA profiles isolated from plasma and serum, characterize the effects of the differences between specimens on ctDNA measurement, and determine the major contributors to these differences. Methods We isolated cell-free DNA (cfDNA) from 119 matched plasma/serum samples from cancer patients and analyzed the cfDNA profiles by DNA fragment sizing. We then assessed KRAS mutations in ctDNA from matched plasma/serum using ddPCR. Results The amount of large DNA fragments was increased in serum, whereas that of cfDNA fragments (<800 bp) was similar in both specimens. ctDNA was less frequently detected in serum, and the KRAS-mutated fraction in serum was significantly lower than that in plasma. The differences in ctDNA fractions between the two specimen types correlated well with the amount of large DNA fragments and white blood cell and neutrophil counts. Conclusions Our results provided detailed insights into the differences between plasma and serum using DNA fragment sizing and ddPCR, potentially contributing to ctDNA analysis standardization. Our study also suggested that using plasma minimizes the dilution of tumor-derived DNA and optimizes the sensitivity of ctDNA analysis. So, plasma should be the preferred specimen type.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA fragment; cell-free DNA; circulating tumor DNA; digital droplet polymerase chain reaction; plasma; serum

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31874093     DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2019-0896

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med        ISSN: 1434-6621            Impact factor:   3.694


  11 in total

1.  Circulating cell-free DNA in health and disease - the relationship to health behaviours, ageing phenotypes and metabolomics.

Authors:  Laura Kananen; Mikko Hurme; Alexander Bürkle; Maria Moreno-Villanueva; Jürgen Bernhardt; Florence Debacq-Chainiaux; Beatrix Grubeck-Loebenstein; Marco Malavolta; Andrea Basso; Francesco Piacenza; Sebastiano Collino; Efstathios S Gonos; Ewa Sikora; Daniela Gradinaru; Eugene H J M Jansen; Martijn E T Dollé; Michel Salmon; Wolfgang Stuetz; Daniela Weber; Tilman Grune; Nicolle Breusing; Andreas Simm; Miriam Capri; Claudio Franceschi; Eline Slagboom; Duncan Talbot; Claude Libert; Jani Raitanen; Seppo Koskinen; Tommi Härkänen; Sari Stenholm; Mika Ala-Korpela; Terho Lehtimäki; Olli T Raitakari; Olavi Ukkola; Mika Kähönen; Marja Jylhä; Juulia Jylhävä
Journal:  Geroscience       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 7.581

Review 2.  The utility of cfDNA in TGCT patient management: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jure Krasic; Lucija Skara; Ana Katusic Bojanac; Monika Ulamec; Davor Jezek; Tomislav Kulis; Nino Sincic
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 5.485

Review 3.  Liquid biopsy in lymphoma: Is it primed for clinical translation?

Authors:  Edward Poynton; Jessica Okosun
Journal:  EJHaem       Date:  2021-05-12

Review 4.  Cell-Free Circulating (Tumor) DNA before Surgery as a Prognostic Factor in Non-Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Suzanna J Schraa; Karlijn L van Rooijen; Miriam Koopman; Geraldine R Vink; Remond J A Fijneman
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 5.  Methylated circulating tumor DNA as a biomarker for colorectal cancer diagnosis, prognosis, and prediction.

Authors:  Farah J Nassar; Zahraa S Msheik; Rihab R Nasr; Sally N Temraz
Journal:  Clin Epigenetics       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 6.551

Review 6.  Circulating Tumor DNA in Precision Oncology and Its Applications in Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Maria F Arisi; Efrat Dotan; Sandra V Fernandez
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 6.208

7.  Increased Circulating Cell-Free DNA in Eosinophilic Granulomatosis With Polyangiitis: Implications for Eosinophil Extracellular Traps and Immunothrombosis.

Authors:  Teppei Hashimoto; Shigeharu Ueki; Yosuke Kamide; Yui Miyabe; Mineyo Fukuchi; Yuichi Yokoyama; Tetsuya Furukawa; Naoto Azuma; Nobuyuki Oka; Hiroki Takeuchi; Kyoko Kanno; Akemi Ishida-Yamamoto; Masami Taniguchi; Akira Hashiramoto; Kiyoshi Matsui
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 7.561

8.  Genetic Characteristics Associated With Drug Resistance in Lung Cancer and Colorectal Cancer Using Whole Exome Sequencing of Cell-Free DNA.

Authors:  Jong Won Lee; Young Soo Park; Jung Yoon Choi; Won Jin Chang; Soohyeon Lee; Jae Sook Sung; Boyeon Kim; Saet Byeol Lee; Sung Yong Lee; Jungmin Choi; Yeul Hong Kim
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 9.  Finding Waldo: The Evolving Paradigm of Circulating Tumor DNA (ctDNA)-Guided Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Assessment in Colorectal Cancer (CRC).

Authors:  Sakti Chakrabarti; Anup Kumar Kasi; Aparna R Parikh; Amit Mahipal
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 10.  Clinical Applications of Minimal Residual Disease Assessments by Tumor-Informed and Tumor-Uninformed Circulating Tumor DNA in Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Jun Gong; Andrew Hendifar; Alexandra Gangi; Karen Zaghiyan; Katelyn Atkins; Yosef Nasseri; Zuri Murrell; Jane C Figueiredo; Sarah Salvy; Robert Haile; Megan Hitchins
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-09-10       Impact factor: 6.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.