Denver M Y Brown1,2, Jeffrey D Graham3, Kira I Innes4, Sheereen Harris4, Ashley Flemington4, Steven R Bray4. 1. Faculty of Kinesiology and Physical Education, University of Toronto, 55 Harbord St., Toronto, ON, M5S 2W6, Canada. denver.brown@utoronto.ca. 2. Department of Kinesiology, McMaster University, 1280 Main St. W, Ivor Wynne Center, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada. denver.brown@utoronto.ca. 3. Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, 100 Main St. W, 5th Floor, Hamilton, ON, L8P 1H6, Canada. 4. Department of Kinesiology, McMaster University, 1280 Main St. W, Ivor Wynne Center, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: An emerging body of the literature in the past two decades has generally shown that prior cognitive exertion is associated with a subsequent decline in physical performance. Two parallel, but overlapping, bodies of literature (i.e., ego depletion, mental fatigue) have examined this question. However, research to date has not merged these separate lines of inquiry to assess the overall magnitude of this effect. OBJECTIVE: The present work reports the results of a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis examining carryover effects of cognitive exertion on physical performance. METHODS: A systematic search of MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and SPORTDiscus was conducted. Only randomized controlled trials involving healthy humans, a central executive task requiring cognitive exertion, an easier cognitive comparison task, and a physical performance task were included. RESULTS: A total of 73 studies provided 91 comparisons with 2581 participants. Random effects meta-analysis showed a significant small-to-medium negative effect of prior cognitive exertion on physical performance (g = - 0.38 [95% CI - 0.46, - 0.31]). Subgroup analyses showed that cognitive tasks lasting < 30-min (g = - 0.45) and ≥ 30-min (g = - 0.30) have similar significant negative effects on subsequent physical performance. Prior cognitive exertion significantly impairs isometric resistance (g = - 0.57), motor (g = - 0.57), dynamic resistance (g = - 0.51), and aerobic performance (g = - 0.26), but the effects on maximal anaerobic performance are trivial and non-significant (g = 0.10). Studies employing between-subject designs showed a medium negative effect (g = - 0.65), whereas within-subject designs had a small negative effect (g = - 0.28). CONCLUSION: Findings demonstrate that cognitive exertion has a negative effect on subsequent physical performance that is not due to chance and suggest that previous meta-analysis results may have underestimated the overall effect.
BACKGROUND: An emerging body of the literature in the past two decades has generally shown that prior cognitive exertion is associated with a subsequent decline in physical performance. Two parallel, but overlapping, bodies of literature (i.e., ego depletion, mental fatigue) have examined this question. However, research to date has not merged these separate lines of inquiry to assess the overall magnitude of this effect. OBJECTIVE: The present work reports the results of a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis examining carryover effects of cognitive exertion on physical performance. METHODS: A systematic search of MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and SPORTDiscus was conducted. Only randomized controlled trials involving healthy humans, a central executive task requiring cognitive exertion, an easier cognitive comparison task, and a physical performance task were included. RESULTS: A total of 73 studies provided 91 comparisons with 2581 participants. Random effects meta-analysis showed a significant small-to-medium negative effect of prior cognitive exertion on physical performance (g = - 0.38 [95% CI - 0.46, - 0.31]). Subgroup analyses showed that cognitive tasks lasting < 30-min (g = - 0.45) and ≥ 30-min (g = - 0.30) have similar significant negative effects on subsequent physical performance. Prior cognitive exertion significantly impairs isometric resistance (g = - 0.57), motor (g = - 0.57), dynamic resistance (g = - 0.51), and aerobic performance (g = - 0.26), but the effects on maximal anaerobic performance are trivial and non-significant (g = 0.10). Studies employing between-subject designs showed a medium negative effect (g = - 0.65), whereas within-subject designs had a small negative effect (g = - 0.28). CONCLUSION: Findings demonstrate that cognitive exertion has a negative effect on subsequent physical performance that is not due to chance and suggest that previous meta-analysis results may have underestimated the overall effect.
Authors: J Mark Davis; Zuowei Zhao; Howard S Stock; Kristen A Mehl; James Buggy; Gregory A Hand Journal: Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol Date: 2002-10-24 Impact factor: 3.619
Authors: Xiaomeng Xu; Kathryn E Demos; Tricia M Leahey; Chantelle N Hart; Jennifer Trautvetter; Pamela Coward; Kathryn R Middleton; Rena R Wing Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-10-21 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Allan Inoue; Priscila Dos Santos Bunn; Everton Crivoi do Carmo; Eduardo Lattari; Elirez Bezerra da Silva Journal: Sports Med Open Date: 2022-03-04
Authors: Denver M Y Brown; Amanda Farias Zuniga; Daanish M Mulla; Divya Mendonca; Peter J Keir; Steven R Bray Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-06-24 Impact factor: 3.390