Literature DB >> 31873880

Comparison of plasma membrane H+-ATPase response to acid rain stress between rice and soybean.

Chanjuan Liang1,2,3, Yongjia Ma4, Lingrui Li4.   

Abstract

Acid rain is a global environmental issue due to inhibiting severely plant growth and productivity. To discover the tolerant mechanism in plants under acid rain stress, we studied the difference in response of two crops (rice and soybean) to simulated acid rain (pH 5.0 ~ 2.5) at growth and physiological, biochemical and molecular levels during exposure and recovery periods by hydroponics. By analyzing the change in relative growth rate, chlorophyll content and plasma permeability in rice and soybean, we found that rice could tolerate acid rain above pH 3.0 whereas soybean could tolerate acid rain above pH 4.5. By RT-PCR analyses, immunoprecipitation and enzyme kinetics study, we observed that pH 4.5 acid rain promoted the transcriptional expression of H+-ATPase genes and the phosphorylation of H+-ATPase and increased H+-ATPase activity in the two crops for resisting acid stress. The increased degree in soybean was larger than that in rice. Acid rain at pH 3.0 still promoted the transcription regulation to maintain H+-ATPase activity higher in rice for resisting stress but caused irreversible inhibition on express of H+-ATPase and decreased H+-ATPase activity in soybean. All results suggest that the different tolerance in rice and soybean to acid rain stress could be associated with difference in plasma membrane H+-ATPase at transcriptional regulation, post-translational modification and the substrate affinity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  14-3-3 protein; Kinetic parameters; Oryza sativa and Glycine max; Tolerance difference; Transcriptional regulation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31873880     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-019-07285-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  3 in total

1.  Acid resistance of Masson pine (Pinus massoniana Lamb.) families and their root morphology and physiological response to simulated acid deposition.

Authors:  Sijie Zhou; Min Zhang; Shuzhan Chen; Wen Xu; Liting Zhu; Shurui Gong; Xiaoqin He; Ping Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 2.  Regulation of Cytosolic pH: The Contributions of Plant Plasma Membrane H+-ATPases and Multiple Transporters.

Authors:  Jin-Yan Zhou; Dong-Li Hao; Guang-Zhe Yang
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 3.  The root apoplastic pH as an integrator of plant signaling.

Authors:  Francisco M Gámez-Arjona; Clara Sánchez-Rodríguez; Juan Carlos Montesinos
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 6.627

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.